• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Driving Through Detroit's Worst Hood - Any Leftists Want To Defend This Sad Truth?

I'd like you to meet my dark skinned Arab friend Al Gebra.

Muḥammad_ibn_Mūsā_al-Khwārizmī.png

(not his real name)
 
..... despite the continent existing for thousands and thousands of years before they even knew white people existed.

View attachment 25096
Reconstruction of ancient Egyptian house.

View attachment 25098
Reconstruction of Northern European house from around the same time.

Yes, I think I see your point. I guess what happened was, more intelligent northern European white people snuck into North Africa.......about 5 thousand years ago, and....then the Egyptians found out that they existed, and learned from them.

Pure stupidity. Everyone knows Egypt was more advanced than the rest of the Continent. For some reason, it was.

But the rest of the continent? Absolutely nothing. Egyptians are also not black. They are light skinned brownish.

Every time we bring up Africa, leftists also shout "Egypt!" as if one country out of the whole continent speaks for the whole thing. This would be like someone asking, "Why is America so poor? I been to Mississippi."
Um, how many Egyptians do you actually know? I used to work with a fair number of Egyptians whose skin tones ranged from lighter than mine (I am a mixture of Welsh/English/Scottish/French/German) to quite dark.

Do you think that a high level of melanin is inversely proportional to intelligence? Can you explain to me just how that would work.
 
Um, how many Egyptians do you actually know? I used to work with a fair number of Egyptians whose skin tones ranged from lighter than mine (I am a mixture of Welsh/English/Scottish/French/German) to quite dark.

Do you think that a high level of melanin is inversely proportional to intelligence? Can you explain to me just how that would work.

It's pretty obvious Half-life wants to say whites are superior without being accused of being a white supremacist. These people like to call themselves "race realists". This isn't intended to be derogatory, I just don't see what other conclusion you can draw from his assertions.
 
Everyone knows Egypt was more advanced than the rest of the Continent. For some reason, it was.

Odd, eh? And it was far more advanced, for thousands of years, than any white civilisation and it lasted longer than white, 'western' civilisation has so far. Funny that. Quite an extended non-white blip.

They couldn't develop electricity, the internet, television, etc.
 
Um, how many Egyptians do you actually know? I used to work with a fair number of Egyptians whose skin tones ranged from lighter than mine (I am a mixture of Welsh/English/Scottish/French/German) to quite dark.

Do you think that a high level of melanin is inversely proportional to intelligence? Can you explain to me just how that would work.

It's pretty obvious Half-life wants to say whites are superior without being accused of being a white supremacist. These people like to call themselves "race realists". This isn't intended to be derogatory, I just don't see what other conclusion you can draw from his assertions.

Race realism would say the Asians are superior because they have the highest IQ's. They don't view education as "being white" the way blacks do.
 
You really think it makes you look intelligent pigeon holing over a billion people over one characteristic don't you? Fun fact, it doesn't.
 
They couldn't develop electricity, the internet, television, etc.


I have no idea what your point is.

They had surgery, clocks, architecture, police, irrigation, ploughs, a calender and writing, just to name but a few, at a time, for thousands of years in fact, when your whitey ancestors in Dumbland were still having trouble stacking lumps of mud on top of one another. :p
 
Last edited:
Do you think that a high level of melanin is inversely proportional to intelligence? Can you explain to me just how that would work.

It's the same as for dogs, sheep, horses, cattle and virtually all other animals, except backwards. What happens is the DNA goes into what is called 'genetic reverse gear'. Exactly why is not known, but among the relevant scientists it's called The Human Stickshift Problem. The good news is that it's reversible by modern medical science. See: Michael Jackson.
 
Last edited:
All joking aside, and in the interests of rational discussion, it is my understanding that at least some of the racial differences in intelligence may indeed be due to genetics. I don't think anyone really knows yet. It seems to be incredibly complicated. And even if (if) some trait (eg intelligence in this case) could be traced back to genes, at least to some extent (if the genetic component of whatever relative size could be isolated in other words) the genetic processes involved will be interplaying from birth (and possibly before) and more importantly will have been interplaying in historical/ancestral terms, with environmental factors, in a way that is so intricately braided together it is very difficult to untangle, with the latter sometimes amplifying and sometimes inhibiting the expression and transmission of the trait.

It may not have anything to do with melanin at all, of course. But melanin is only one characteristic of variance between what are called races (which I believe becomes a very fuzzy term under close analysis).

In a nutshell, it seems reasonable and plausible to say that genes play a part. How big a part I don't think anyone knows.

That is my layman's understanding, informed by googling and talking briefly to daughter who has a Masters in Biology.

This hereditary/genetic intelligence thing deserves a separate discussion perhaps, so I'll start a new thread.
 
Last edited:
All joking aside, and in the interests of rational discussion, it is my understanding that at least some of the racial differences in intelligence may indeed be due to genetics.

:eek: Your understanding is incorrect. First of all, there is only one race that we all belong to, so it fails from the outset. In regard to any differences on a genetic level, they could only ever be familial and not from another species. So far as I know, humans cannot successfully mate with any other race of creatures on this planet.
 
They couldn't develop electricity, the internet, television, etc.


I have no idea what your point is.

They had surgery, clocks, architecture, police, irrigation, ploughs, a calender and writing, just to name but a few, at a time, for thousands of years in fact, when your whitey ancestors in Dumbland were still having trouble stacking lumps of mud on top of one another. :p

How's this not a racist statement?
 
They couldn't develop electricity, the internet, television, etc.


I have no idea what your point is.

They had surgery, clocks, architecture, police, irrigation, ploughs, a calender and writing, just to name but a few, at a time, for thousands of years in fact, when your whitey ancestors in Dumbland were still having trouble stacking lumps of mud on top of one another. :p

How's this not a racist statement?

How is this not a racist OP?
 
How's this not a racist statement?

How is this not a racist OP?

Just pointing out how it's OK to be racist against whites these days. It's a double standard.

"Ruby Sparks" would NEVER use that phrase to describe people who live in mud huts in Africa: "Your blackey ancestors are still having trouble stacking lumps of mud on top of each other in Africa."
 
How's this not a racist statement?

How is this not a racist OP?

Just pointing out how it's OK to be racist against whites these days. It's a double standard.

"Ruby Sparks" would NEVER use that phrase to describe people who live in mud huts in Africa: "Your blackey ancestors are still having trouble stacking lumps of mud on top of each other in Africa."

So you're admitting that you are a racist.
 
Just pointing out how it's OK to be racist against whites these days. It's a double standard.

"Ruby Sparks" would NEVER use that phrase to describe people who live in mud huts in Africa: "Your blackey ancestors are still having trouble stacking lumps of mud on top of each other in Africa."

So you're admitting that you are a racist.

I go by the facts. I don't arbitrarily love a large group of people like the left does. The left says things like, "Let Muslims come in willy nilly!" I ask, "What type of Muslims are we letting in?"

See? Nuance. Something the left is incapable of.
 
Just pointing out how it's OK to be racist against whites these days. It's a double standard.

"Ruby Sparks" would NEVER use that phrase to describe people who live in mud huts in Africa: "Your blackey ancestors are still having trouble stacking lumps of mud on top of each other in Africa."

So you're admitting that you are a racist.

I go by the facts. I don't arbitrarily love a large group of people like the left does. The left says things like, "Let Muslims come in willy nilly!" I ask, "What type of Muslims are we letting in?"

See? Nuance. Something the left is incapable of.

"willy nilly"? who of any significance said that or anything like it (i.e. "open borders")? You are lying or failing to see the "nuance" between what people say and what you claim to hear (but I don't believe you are honest about what you think you know).
 
I go by the facts.

The you should start using them. Still waiting on your proof that doctors diagnose people with TDS, by the way. And there has been a couple of hundred other instances where your have been asked to back up your "facts" (btw you keep spelling bullshit wrong) with proof.
And when someone points out your "facts" is just bigoted crap, you remain silent.
 
They couldn't develop electricity, the internet, television, etc.


I have no idea what your point is.

They had surgery, clocks, architecture, police, irrigation, ploughs, a calender and writing, just to name but a few, at a time, for thousands of years in fact, when your whitey ancestors in Dumbland were still having trouble stacking lumps of mud on top of one another. :p

How's this not a racist statement?
A sarcastic response to your racism gets your attention, and exacerbates your victimhood, where actual facts bounce off your defensive shields... quel suprise,
 
They couldn't develop electricity, the internet, television, etc.


I have no idea what your point is.

They had surgery, clocks, architecture, police, irrigation, ploughs, a calender and writing, just to name but a few, at a time, for thousands of years in fact, when your whitey ancestors in Dumbland were still having trouble stacking lumps of mud on top of one another. :p

How's this not a racist statement?

We just go by the facts, you and I both. 🙂

But seriously, it was irony. Those I called your white ancestors in the mud huts were probably approximately as intelligent as the Egyptians, and if there were differences it probably wasn’t because of skin colour. For the most part, there were probably other factors, many, many of them, just as there always have been and are.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom