Ex-St. Louis cop found not guilty of murder in on-duty shooting of black man in 2011

[laughing dog]

Update: St. Louis Board of Aldermen Passes Resolution to Remember Anthony Lamar Smith, Who Was Killed by Now-Former Police Officer Jason Stockley

The resolution also mentions his career as a MdcDonald's "assistant cashier". What it does not mention, however, is his career as a heroin dealer and thief, or him using of illegal guns. As far as the city of St. Louis is concerned, Anthony Lamar Smith dindu nuffin.

“His mother had to wait six years for justice, which she still did not get,” Collins-Muhammad said. “So I invited her here today to let her know the city of St. Louis and the Board of Aldermen shares her pain, her frustration and her deep dissatisfaction with the turnout of everything that has happened.”

Justice does not mean that the cop gets convicted no matter the evidence. And why am I not surprised that the alderman spearheading this travesty is a Muslim. And not just a Muslim, according to his wikipedia page, he is member of the racist, black supremacist Nation of Islam. He is, unsurprisingly, also a big fan of Michael Brown.

Different strokes for different folk, including snowflakes.

 

[Derec]

Different strokes for different folk,

So you think there is nothing wrong with cities honoring heroin dealers and thieves? Or with electing racist black supremacists?
I mean, St. Louis is doing so well under current leadership.

Under Collins-Muhammad's courageous anti-police, pro-thug, leadership, St. Louis will become number 1 yet...

including snowflakes.

You still don't understand the meaning of that word.

 

[laughing dog]

So you think there is nothing wrong with cities honoring heroin dealers and thieves? Or with electing racist black supremacists?

I think cities can honor who they please - including citizens who they feel were wrongly killed by the police.
I mean, St. Louis is doing so well under current leadership.

You still don't understand the meaning of that word.

I know English is not your first language, so you still have a lot to learn about it - http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Snowflake.

 

[Derec]

I think cities can honor who they please - including citizens who they feel were wrongly killed by the police.

Did I say Muhammad/city council did anything illegal? Of course they can honor whomever they please, including violent thugs. But it is still an idiotic idea to do so and shows a deep hostility toward police on part of the St. Louis political establishment. No wonder the murder rate is so high when police are demonized and thugs lionized!

And as to "wrongly killed" - that was an allegation, not proven in court.
In fact, the facts speak against that allegation. Smith was dealing heroin while on parole, fled from police (almost striking one of them), led them on a high speed chase and finally reached for his gun when cornered. Everything points to it being a good shooting.

I mean, St. Louis is doing so well under current leadership.

What are you now, a parrot?

I know English is not your first language, so you still have a lot to learn about it - http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Snowflake.

I know you are old, and you still have a lot to learn about the internet, but anybody can edit Urban Dictionary. It has many outright wrong definitions, like this one.
Snowflake refers to mostly college students who do not want to engage in any discussion or debate about topic that might hurt their feelings. Theirs are the safe spaces and trigger warnings. Theirs is not participating in an internet forum mostly populated by people that disagree with them.

Alt-left, for example you and the Urban Dictionary vandals, are trying to coopt the word as a general term of abuse against people you disagree with.

 

[Derec]

It seems like #BLM idiots in St. Louis are still protesting, including doing illegal things like blocking highways.
143 arrested after protest blocks St. Louis highway traffic
Because the biggest problem facing St. Louis is armed thugs getting shot by police, and not St. Louis having 2nd highest murder rate in the US ...

 

[laughing dog]

Did I say Muhammad/city council did anything illegal? Of course they can honor whomever they please, including violent thugs. But it is still an idiotic idea to do so and shows a deep hostility toward police on part of the St. Louis political establishment. No wonder the murder rate is so high when police are demonized and thugs lionized!

I know English is not your first language, because I never said anything about legality or illegality about what the city did.

And as to "wrongly killed" - that was an allegation, not proven in court...

No it is not an allegation, it is a conclusion to which they have arrived. As to the rest of your response, announcing you are going to kill someone and then you go kill that person is an indication of premeditation.

I know you are old, and you still have a lot to learn about the internet, but anybody can edit Urban Dictionary. It has many outright wrong definitions, like this one.

Because you say so? If you actually understood English and had read the entire link , it gave a link to the history of the term snowflake. And that indicates that people like you have co-opted the meaning of the word.

Moreover, if you understood English and could reason, you would see that I use the term "snowflake" to refer to anyone who cannot handle disagreement without getting his or her feeling hurt. It has nothing to do with whether someone agree with me or not. Your persistent whining about the proper use of the term snowflake is an indication that you are a snowflake.

 

[Derec]

I know English is not your first language, because I never said anything about legality or illegality about what the city did.

I know reaosning is not your strong suit, but "can" in your statement that "cities can honor who they please" has a meaning of abillity or permissibility.
My argument was about advisability of honoring a violent heroin dealer.

No it is not an allegation, it is a conclusion to which they have arrived.

It's an allegation that the court rejected.
The city council is not a competent body to judge if a shooting was justfied or not.
And even if the shooting was not justified, it would still not make their decision to honor that guy the right one.

As to the rest of your response, announcing you are going to kill someone and then you go kill that person is an indication of premeditation.

Not necessarily, as the judge rejected that argument.

Because you say so?

No, it's a fact.

If you actually understood English and had read the entire link , it gave a link to the history of the term snowflake. And that indicates that people like you have co-opted the meaning of the word.

Wrong. It is the alt-left who co-opted the word to refer to anybody who rejects the left-wing paradigm. That is the same way you are misusing the term.

Moreover, if you understood English and could reason, you would see that I use the term "snowflake" to refer to anyone who cannot handle disagreement without getting his or her feeling hurt. It has nothing to do with whether someone agree with me or not. Your persistent whining about the proper use of the term snowflake is an indication that you are a snowflake.

You cannot handle disagreements without starting to insult everybody who disagrees with you.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

Alt-left, for example you and the Urban Dictionary vandals, are trying to coopt the word as a general term of abuse against people you disagree with.

This sounds cool--how can I join this alleged conspiracy?

 

[Derec]

This sounds cool--how can I join this alleged conspiracy?

It's not a conspiracy per se, but if you want to join, it's easy to sign up.

 

[fromderinside]

So you are saying there is no alt-left conspiracy?

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

This sounds cool--how can I join this alleged conspiracy?

It's not a conspiracy per se, but if you want to join, it's easy to sign up.

So I'm just supposed to ignore the email directives from former President Blackenstein and George Soros?

 

[laughing dog]

I know reaosning is not your strong suit,...blah blah blah...

LOL. You are the one who brought up "illegality", not me.

It's an allegation that the court rejected.
The city council is not a competent body to judge if a shooting was justfied or not.

Neither are you, but that doesn't stop you from coming to conclusions.

And even if the shooting was not justified, it would still not make their decision to honor that guy the right one.

That is your opinion.

Not necessarily, as the judge rejected that argument.

Of course it is necessarily- otherwise words have no meaning.

Wrong. ...

The link gives the history of the word use. Your argument ignores that history.

You cannot handle disagreements without starting to insult everybody who disagrees with you.

Pretty ironic stuff coming from someone who starts a post with "I know reaosning is not your strong suit, ".