Wrong. The fact is that we cannot demonstrate that the material world exists and is real. In order to assert that the material world is real, and is a product of God's mind or the minds of humans (whatever the fuck that means), you would first have to demonstrate that the material world exists. Which you cannot do. Therefore, at best, you are stuck in the same boat as atheists, and haven't demonstrated anything other than your ability to make up shit, and your lack of understanding of how logical arguments work.
But you guys go a step further and say, "the material world can exist independently of minds," which is something that can not be observed unless we all left our minds outside of our bodies.
You ignored what I was saying, perhaps because you didn't want to acknowledge it, or more likely because you didn't understand it.
You cannot prove that reality exists, independently of minds, or otherwise. You cannot prove that you are not a brain in a vat immersed in a simulation, and you cannot prove that when your mind is unplugged from the simulation, reality will continue to exist. That is your own argument.
Since you cannot prove that reality exists independently of your mind, you cannot prove that there is a god around to sustain reality when nobody else is looking. Therefore, your argument for God's existence fails. And you are guilty of presupposing the very premise you have been accusing atheists of presupposing.
This fundamental flaw in your argument cannot be overcome by pointing at atheists and saying "I know I'm wrong, but look over there". That is just an attempt at distraction. Or, you simply don't understand what the fuck you are talking about, and I am incorrect in believing that you actually have a brain that can be used to think.