• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Fan blades

unapologetic

55+ years without a god
Joined
Dec 12, 2023
Messages
1,505
Location
Penna., Fascist States of Amerika
Basic Beliefs
Hasa Diga Eebowai, antitheist,
I am sitting here looking at the box fan in my window.
I notice the blades are narrower at the ends than they are at the center hub.
Years ago they were wider. Clover leaf shapes.
I am wondering, why the change? I would think wider blades would push more air.
Perhaps smaller blades encounter less resistance, therefore require less electricy? But do they push as much air?
Related: Why are wind generator blades so narrow, and only three?
 
I am sitting here looking at the box fan in my window.
I notice the blades are narrower at the ends than they are at the center hub.
Years ago they were wider. Clover leaf shapes.
I am wondering, why the change? I would think wider blades would push more air.
They do.
Perhaps smaller blades encounter less resistance, therefore require less electricy?
Yes.
But do they push as much air?
Only if they spin faster.
Related: Why are wind generator blades so narrow, and only three?
Fewer is better. Three is as low as you can go without causing more problems than you solve.

The faster a fan spins, the fewer blades it needs, and the narrower the blades need to be, to get maxmum efficiency - air moved per unit of power expended.

Electric motors are getting faster and cheaper (largely because of improvements in permanent magnets, which are now far stronger for a given size, being made from rare-earths rather than just steel); So fan blades are getting faster and narrower.

A fan blade develops most of its drag at the tips, and the tips of the blade move faster than the hub, so thinning the blades towards the tips is generally beneficial.

Wind turbines have similar efficiency and speed realted design issues.

An efficient electricity generating wind turbine will ideally maintain a high speed, and having a large blade area increases torque at the expense of speed. So the blades need to be as thin and as few in number as possible.

Three is the smallest practical number for a stable, steerable turbine (even number blade turbines suffer higher gyroscopic stresses when steering to face the wind, so two blades are typically less good than three; One blade turbines wear rapidly due to lack of balance).

For applications where torque is more important than speed or efficiency (such as raising water from a well, where getting some water on low wind days is better than getting the most water possible over a year, but having more days with no water at all) a turbine with more, wider, blades that are optimised for low speed by widening towards the tips, is more appropriate, which is why farm wind turbines used for that purpose look very different from electricity generating turbines.
 
Last edited:
Part of it is probably centrifugal force and blade balance. The spinning blade is in tension as it spins, pulled apart like stretching an elastic band. Thinner blades at the ends means lower force. At any point the tensile force on the blade can not exceed the limit of the material.

I just bought two identical fans, one for living room and one for bedroom.

One has a barely perceivable by touch vibration the other more noticeable, blade balance.

Another issue is efficiency. A fan blade is an airfoil like a wing or propeller. You want the least friction and maxim fluid flow. More friction for a given air flow means more electricity.

You could search on fan blade deign issues. There is probably a lot of information as to different blade designs..
 
Back
Top Bottom