Sure, and who was in charge of the department and set the tone?
- - - Updated - - -
More like Stein.
-
Features
FBI recommends no charges against Mrs Clinton: let the accusations begin. Will this help or hurt HRC?
- Thread starter laughing dog
- Start date
Sure, and who was in charge of the department and set the tone?
- - - Updated - - -
More like Stein.
It's a winner-take-all system, so that's actually the same thing.
Maybe I was going to vote republican but changed my mind to Stein. So now it's magically a vote for Hillary!
Not magic, just a third grade understanding of how math works. Have fun with your superb wall.
Tristan Scott
Senior Member
You switched from Republican to Green?
During the Chaffetz questioning Comey said Hillary did allow non-cleared people access to classified information.
Her attorneys
Yeah, I heard that exchange after I posted the above. So I guess that's going to be the hair-on-fire Republican faux-outrage since they can't find anything else... She let her attorneys go through the emails to provide the work-related ones as she was ordered to do, apparently not realizing that any of them would after-the-fact be declared contemporaneously classified, and a whopping three would have little (c)'s somewhere in the body of them.
Will Wiley
Veteran Member
Will Wiley
Veteran Member
FBI Director Comey: If Hillary Worked At The FBI There Would Be Consequences
But Hillary will not be punished at all
But Hillary will not be punished at all
Way to selectively post to further your agenda
HRC does not work for the FBI. If she did, as FBI Director Comey VERY CLEARLY STATED, she would be subject to those same potential consequences. He also stated very clearly that if someone who no longer worked for the FBI was found to have violated security policy, the FBI could not do anything about it then either. The key point is whether the person is still employed by the FBI or State Department, not whether their name is HRC
HRC does not work for the FBI. If she did, as FBI Director Comey VERY CLEARLY STATED, she would be subject to those same potential consequences. He also stated very clearly that if someone who no longer worked for the FBI was found to have violated security policy, the FBI could not do anything about it then either. The key point is whether the person is still employed by the FBI or State Department, not whether their name is HRC
Derec
Contributor
Way to selectively post to further your agenda
HRC does not work for the FBI. If she did, as FBI Director Comey VERY CLEARLY STATED, she would be subject to those same potential consequences. He also stated very clearly that if someone who no longer worked for the FBI was found to have violated security policy, the FBI could not do anything about it then either. The key point is whether the person is still employed by the FBI or State Department, not whether their name is HRC
The point is that we are about to give HRC a huge promotion. It would be like a FBI agent being given a promotion to director after mishandling emails.
Tristan Scott
Senior Member
Sure she will. She won't get your vote.
Oh, thats right, you weren't voting for her anyway.
Guess you're right. No punishment. Yay.
Tristan Scott
Senior Member
We are.Way to selectively post to further your agenda
HRC does not work for the FBI. If she did, as FBI Director Comey VERY CLEARLY STATED, she would be subject to those same potential consequences. He also stated very clearly that if someone who no longer worked for the FBI was found to have violated security policy, the FBI could not do anything about it then either. The key point is whether the person is still employed by the FBI or State Department, not whether their name is HRC
The point is that we are about to give HRC a huge promotion. It would be like a FBI agent being given a promotion to director after mishandling emails.
Not you.
I don't give a rats ass about her fucking emails. Obviously none of them were hacked or we've had heard by now. She fucked up, and said she was wrong. If thats not good enough for you, then I guess thats just tough shit for you.
laughing dog
Contributor
Yes because the alternative is that the biggest narcisstic scam artist in the FBI will get the job otherwise. A narcissitic scam artist who spouts the anti-immigration and anti-Muslim bigotry you promote. You really are not fooling anyone with your posts.Way to selectively post to further your agenda
HRC does not work for the FBI. If she did, as FBI Director Comey VERY CLEARLY STATED, she would be subject to those same potential consequences. He also stated very clearly that if someone who no longer worked for the FBI was found to have violated security policy, the FBI could not do anything about it then either. The key point is whether the person is still employed by the FBI or State Department, not whether their name is HRC
The point is that we are about to give HRC a huge promotion. It would be like a FBI agent being given a promotion to director after mishandling emails.
This is the part that boggles my mind. Does any sane person truly believe that (1) HRC is really a security risk, and/or (2) the Trump is a better choice with regard to national security and/or classified information?
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2002
- Messages
- 39,105
- Location
- Frozen in Michigan
- Gender
- Old Fart
- Basic Beliefs
- Don't be a dick.
The butt-hurt amongst the rethugs on that committee was palpable.
Nothing. The "follow up" isn't actually any kind of follow up. It's more political gamesmanship.
This is an inquiry by the State Department, under Tony "Abe" Blinken, not an investigation called by congressional opposition.
http://www.theverge.com/2016/7/7/12...email-investigation-state-department-reopened
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/biog/236057.htm