• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

FIVE AMERICANS WHO ARE STANDING AGAINST RADICAL ISLAM

If they get special treatment to this extent for religious reasons we ALL lose because they set or further entrench a horrible precedent. We need to keep that wall between church and state strong. No special rights based on religion. I don't care if its Muslims (fgm), Jehova's Witnesses (blood transfusions and children), Sikhs (kirpan), or anybody else. Anywhere a muslima can wear a face veil, I should be allowed to wear a ski mask. Full stop.
 
Jolly_Penguin said:
If they get special treatment to this extent for religious reasons we ALL lose because they set or further entrench a horrible precedent. We need to keep that wall between church and state strong. No special rights based on religion. I don't care if its Muslims (fgm), Jehova's Witnesses (blood transfusions and children), Sikhs (kirpan), or anybody else. Anywhere a muslima can wear a face veil, I should be allowed to wear a ski mask. Full stop.
Click to expand...

I'm sure this won't extend to beheading or hand-chopping.
 
whichphilosophy said:
Jolly_Penguin said:
If they get special treatment to this extent for religious reasons we ALL lose because they set or further entrench a horrible precedent. We need to keep that wall between church and state strong. No special rights based on religion. I don't care if its Muslims (fgm), Jehova's Witnesses (blood transfusions and children), Sikhs (kirpan), or anybody else. Anywhere a muslima can wear a face veil, I should be allowed to wear a ski mask. Full stop.
Click to expand...

I'm sure this won't extend to beheading or hand-chopping.
Click to expand...

Well I, of course not. But if it did, then I get the right to behead whoever I want because they offended my imaginary friend too. Lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom