Underseer
Contributor
Nope.
The Guardian, !!
So you have no substantive argument and will continue to deny something that oil companies have recognised themselves for 3 decades. Cool - instead of facile argument by emoticon you could try point out any errors in their reporting... but to be honest this is about the level of logical and rational thought most people associate with deniers anyway so it's not a huge surprise.
If he can reject the conclusions of 97% of the relevant experts, then ignoring the leaders of his anti-science religion should be no problem for him.
All he has to do is argue that the leaders of his anti-science religion are part of the vast international conspiracy against oil companies. That kind of cognitive dissonance should be no problem for the typical rightist.