• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Guest lecturer at Yale fantasizes about shooting white people in the head

Yup, today's whites didn't have anything to do with:
  • colonialism
  • slavery
  • Jim Crow
  • red lining
  • mortgage covenants
  • privatization of public amenities
  • reaction to the Civil Rights movement in the 50s/60s.
  • high rate of imprisoning blacks over drug offenses 80s/90s

Today's whites are however, involved in a weird conspiracy or communal denial that these things have had no significant impact on the black community in the US, and claim the blacks need to just get over it.

I'd also like to add to the list that many institutions that benefited from slavery are still around today, and while the owners & their children, CEO's & their children had nothing to do with slavery, they are still benefiting from slavery working for an institution that was built on the back of slaves. Those institutions have an obligation to help remedy the damages IMO. Supporting black communities and keeping work environments inclusive is enough for me (can't speak for everyone though).
What about blacks in Africa? They benefited from selling slaves to New World too.
Last I checked, Africa isn't in the United States.
What about blacks in Africa? They benefited from selling slaves to New World too.

I don't see any harm in them trying to remedy a wrong either.
So reparations from African countries to blacks in US.
As noted above, the ills suffered by Blacks in the US stems much further in the timeline than just slavery.
 
What about blacks in Africa? They benefited from selling slaves to New World too.
Last I checked, Africa isn't in the United States.
Not all whites are in the United States either. So she needs to be more specific - only american whites and preferably not very recent immigrants.
What about blacks in Africa? They benefited from selling slaves to New World too.

I don't see any harm in them trying to remedy a wrong either.
So reparations from African countries to blacks in US.
As noted above, the ills suffered by Blacks in the US stems much further in the timeline than just slavery.
Yes, that's what I am getting at. US Slavery is an end result of wars africans were conducting against each other.
 
What about blacks in Africa? They benefited from selling slaves to New World too.

I don't see any harm in them trying to remedy a wrong either.
So reparations from African countries to blacks in US.

I have extremely limited knowledge of politics, the economy & the people of African countries. Is there a reason why you think I would know enough to answer that question? J/k. I wouldn't call it reparations (because of the whole my ancestors did it not me thingy), however, one country sending aid to another isn't unheard of. Any assistance to remedy this problem coming from anywhere around the world is welcome. Is there harm in that?
 
Conservatives also say, "if you broke it, fix it." So, since the human species originated in Africa, Africa should bomb the rest of the world into non-existence.
 
I wonder what she thinks about whites from countries which did not take part in colonialism and slavery - Eastern and Central Europe, Russia.
Same thing, of course. Modern day whites in the US didn't have anything to do with slavery and colonialism, yet she hates them. So, you don't actually have to have been involved. Just being the same skin color is enough.
Yup, today's whites didn't have anything to do with:
  • colonialism
  • slavery
  • Jim Crow
  • red lining
  • mortgage covenants
  • privatization of public amenities
  • reaction to the Civil Rights movement in the 50s/60s.
  • high rate of imprisoning blacks over drug offenses 80s/90s

Today's whites are however, involved in a weird conspiracy or communal denial that these things have had no significant impact on the black community in the US, and claim the blacks need to just get over it.

Could you be more specific as to thebeave’s involvement in this? If were gonna hate on someone, would prefer not to base it on skin hue.
 
Come on, White people. We only have your best interest at heart. Do not attempt to draw any historical parallels. Do. Not.

Whiteness is a condition one first acquires and then one has—a malignant, parasitic-like condition to which “white” people have a particular susceptibility. The condition is foundational, generating characteristic ways of being in one’s body, in one’s mind, and in one’s world. Parasitic Whiteness renders its hosts’ appetites voracious, insatiable, and perverse. These deformed appetites particularly target nonwhite peoples. Once established, these appetites are nearly impossible to eliminate. Effective treatment consists of a combination of psychic and social-historical interventions. Such interventions can reasonably aim only to reshape Whiteness’s infiltrated appetites—to reduce their intensity, redistribute their aims, and occasionally turn those aims toward the work of reparation. When remembered and represented, the ravages wreaked by the chronic condition can function either as warning (“never again”) or as temptation (“great again”). Memorialization alone, therefore, is no guarantee against regression. There is not yet a permanent cure.
On Having Whiteness

No cure? I don’t know; surely the Woke can come up with a final solution.
 
Come on, White people. We only have your best interest at heart. Do not attempt to draw any historical parallels. Do. Not.

Whiteness is a condition one first acquires and then one has—a malignant, parasitic-like condition to which “white” people have a particular susceptibility. The condition is foundational, generating characteristic ways of being in one’s body, in one’s mind, and in one’s world. Parasitic Whiteness renders its hosts’ appetites voracious, insatiable, and perverse. These deformed appetites particularly target nonwhite peoples. Once established, these appetites are nearly impossible to eliminate. Effective treatment consists of a combination of psychic and social-historical interventions. Such interventions can reasonably aim only to reshape Whiteness’s infiltrated appetites—to reduce their intensity, redistribute their aims, and occasionally turn those aims toward the work of reparation. When remembered and represented, the ravages wreaked by the chronic condition can function either as warning (“never again”) or as temptation (“great again”). Memorialization alone, therefore, is no guarantee against regression. There is not yet a permanent cure.
On Having Whiteness

No cure? I don’t know; surely the Woke can come up with a final solution.

If that was posted in a thread called "What book is this? Wrong answers only" I'd say Dianetics: The Modern Science of Mental Health.
 
If it's any consolation, I don't think all white people are racist. I also don't think the Trifecta on this board is racist; just ill-informed. But I guess that doesn't make me a part of the woke so it may not ease concerns.
 
If it's any consolation, I don't think all white people are racist. I also don't think the Trifecta on this board is racist; just ill-informed. But I guess that doesn't make me a part of the woke so it may not ease concerns.

It comes down to whether you treat a person as an individual or as a member of a group. For my Gen-X generation, you treat a person as an individual and do not prejudge based on group characteristics. This has inexplicably become controversial.
 
If it's any consolation, I don't think all white people are racist. I also don't think the Trifecta on this board is racist; just ill-informed. But I guess that doesn't make me a part of the woke so it may not ease concerns.

It comes down to whether you treat a person as an individual or as a member of a group. For my Gen-X generation, you treat a person as an individual and do not prejudge based on group characteristics. This has inexplicably become controversial.

Individuals can also be members of groups.

If you belong to the KKK that says something about you.

If you leave the KKK and renounce it that says something else.

If you support 'black lives matter' that says something too.

If you fully support Kaepenick kneeling that says something.

If you think Kaepernick crossed some line that says something.

An individual is judged not only on their ideas but by which groups they freely belong to.
 
If it's any consolation, I don't think all white people are racist. I also don't think the Trifecta on this board is racist; just ill-informed. But I guess that doesn't make me a part of the woke so it may not ease concerns.

It comes down to whether you treat a person as an individual or as a member of a group. For my Gen-X generation, you treat a person as an individual and do not prejudge based on group characteristics. This has inexplicably become controversial.

Individuals can also be members of groups.

If you belong to the KKK that says something about you.

If you leave the KKK and renounce it that says something else.

If you support 'black lives matter' that says something too.

If you fully support Kaepenick kneeling that says something.

If you think Kaepernick crossed some line that says something.

An individual is judged not only on their ideas but by which groups they freely belong to.

This all makes sense, the only issue some humans seem to have is when someone agrees with a message (aka group) it doesn't mean they agree with every action done by another person who happens to agree with that message (group) too.
 
For my Gen-X generation, you treat a person as an individual and do not prejudge based on group characteristics.

So the Gen-X generation has the group characteristic that it doesn't prejudge based on group characteristics?

Is your race the most important thing about you? Yes/No?

Wow. It would appear that you are trying to buttress a self-contradictory stereotype you invented with anecdotal evidence. I suggest instead you just admit a small error and instead say something like "It's a popular belief among my Gen-X generation that X," rather than ascribing a belief to a whole demographic group... here also is an interesting analysis:
MILLENNIALS ARE MORE LIKELY TO OPPOSE RACISM
 
How dare this individual woman with no power have bad thoughts about white people!

No power? She was lecturing a group of doctors and pyschologists who specialize in treating children. Her views are being taught to people who will then spread those same view to children.

Step back and ask yourself... would you be defending the speaker had they expressed the exact same views about a different skin color? If the speaker were railing against jewish people, or arabic people, or asian people... would you be defending them as being a victim and excusing their comments as if they are acceptable?
 
Back
Top Bottom