• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Happy new year! What did you change your mind about in 2018?

PyramidHead

Contributor
Joined
Aug 14, 2005
Messages
5,080
Location
RI
Basic Beliefs
Marxist-Leninist
As we embark on another year together in the emerging hellworld that is the political sphere of civilization, I think it's good to reflect on the fact that we should always be willing to learn new things and continually challenge our beliefs. What are some of the things that you changed your mind about in the last year, and why?

And if you didn't change your mind about anything in the last year, when is the last time you made a major revision to your worldview?

And if you haven't changed anything about your worldview in a long time, what is your worldview and why are you satisfied that it's the correct one?

I'll go first.

Last year, I changed my mind about gun control. For most of my life as a liberal, I thought I had a pretty neat solution to the problem of gun violence. Step one, aggressively fund research into non-lethal forms of projectile weaponry for citizen use (tasers, rubber bullets, tranquilizer darts, sonic waves, anything that incapacitates someone without killing them). Step two, make these widely available to the public. Step three, ban all other firearms for civilian use. Punish severely anybody who obtains a gun capable of killing someone.

What changed my mind about this issue? It wasn't anything about fundamental liberties or the risk of a black market. It was my realization that nobody in a position of illegitimate authority should have the power to (a) claim for themselves a monopoly on the use of deadly force and (b) the ability to control the use of non-deadly force among those they hold authority over. Among the most illegitimate forms of authority is the state, generally speaking, unless it is a radically democratic state and so decentralized and autonomous that it barely qualifies as one. We don't have too many of those (arguably because states tend to concentrate power just like markets concentrate money), and letting the state dictate everybody else's access to tools that could be used against it is bad strategy. Here I'm using "state" to not only refer to institutions that are directly funded by taxes, but also those intertwined private structures that the state exists to uphold, and thus generously subsidizes.

So, I went from a classic Loren Pechtel-coined and self-professed "gun grabber" to basically a libertarian about gun control. And accordingly, I lost all the remaining respect I had for cops and soldiers, who I now believe are all bastards with no reason to exist.

What about you?
 
Kudos for you Pyramidhead on the realization that many in our government can not be trusted.

For myself in 2018, I must admit an altered perception just how powerful the globalist elite really are. They were not able to stop Trump from becoming president. Nor have they been able to take him out so far, all of their FBI coup plots in 2018 appear to have failed as well. I would have not thought such things were even possible a year ago...and yet Trump still remains alive and POTUS. So perhaps the globalists are not quite as powerful or in complete control as I thought they were? I guess I'm still not sure but I am much more optimistic at the prospects for a vibrant populous movement that may actually survive.

In any case, our future will be the telling as it unfolds for us in 2019. And we will see in 2019 if there are any more FED and/or bankster scams converting even more wealth from the middle class to the uber rich.
 
Kudos for you Pyramidhead on the realization that many in our government can not be trusted.

For myself in 2018, I must admit an altered perception just how powerful the globalist elite really are. They were not able to stop Trump from becoming president. Nor have they been able to take him out so far, all of their FBI coup plots in 2018 appear to have failed as well. I would have not thought such things were even possible a year ago...and yet Trump still remains alive and POTUS. So perhaps the globalists are not quite as powerful or in complete control as I thought they were? I guess I'm still not sure but I am much more optimistic at the prospects for a vibrant populous movement that may actually survive.

In any case, our future will be the telling as it unfolds for us in 2019. And we will see in 2019 if there are any more FED and/or bankster scams converting even more wealth from the middle class to the uber rich.

Did you originally think of the globalist elite as an organized body with a unified vision, and now you think otherwise? Or has your definition of a globalist elite changed?

It's interesting the ways that groups of people can be segmented out from the world. I would not regard Trump and his movement as meaningfully different from the people you would call the globalist elites, not because I think he agrees with them, but because I think they are similar in ways that matter more (at least to me), one of which you mention: converting wealth from the bottom to the top. Whether this is done through global trade deals or isolationist capitalism is not very interesting to me, so I don't see the same dichotomy as you do.
 
Decided I'm going to be more civil. The reasons are pretty self-explanatory.
 
Decided I'm going to be more civil. The reasons are pretty self-explanatory.

Funny, I came to the opposite conclusion and decided to be a dirtbag leftist instead of a polite one. What are your reasons (which to me are obviously not self-explanatory since I would like you to explain them)?
 
I gave up on the "evangelicals" when I recognized they'd sell out their principles to try to get abortion banned.
 
I must admit an altered perception just how powerful the globalist elite really are. They were not able to stop Trump from becoming president. Nor have they been able to take him out so far, all of their FBI coup plots in 2018 appear to have failed as well.

I have to assume you're kidding, and are well aware that Cheato is "their boy". If, that is, by "global elites" you refer to the billionaire class.
Have they EVER done better than under Trump's thieving hand? 69 industry lobbyists working in Departments that they used to lobby, restrictions on un-earned wealth getting repealed or neglected - what more could they ask?
 
I must admit an altered perception just how powerful the globalist elite really are. They were not able to stop Trump from becoming president. Nor have they been able to take him out so far, all of their FBI coup plots in 2018 appear to have failed as well.

I have to assume you're kidding, and are well aware that Cheato is "their boy". If, that is, by "global elites" you refer to the billionaire class.
Have they EVER done better than under Trump's thieving hand? 69 industry lobbyists working in Departments that they used to lobby, restrictions on un-earned wealth getting repealed or neglected - what more could they ask?
Cheato ain't "their boy". No one likes or trusts Trump. "Their boys", however, are the aides, staffers, and Cabinet appointments in his Administration.
 
I must admit an altered perception just how powerful the globalist elite really are. They were not able to stop Trump from becoming president. Nor have they been able to take him out so far, all of their FBI coup plots in 2018 appear to have failed as well.

I have to assume you're kidding, and are well aware that Cheato is "their boy". If, that is, by "global elites" you refer to the billionaire class.
Have they EVER done better than under Trump's thieving hand? 69 industry lobbyists working in Departments that they used to lobby, restrictions on un-earned wealth getting repealed or neglected - what more could they ask?
Cheato ain't "their boy". No one likes or trusts Trump. "Their boys", however, are the aides, staffers, and Cabinet appointments in his Administration.

Yah, so he's a symbol, a puppet, easily manipulated by the aides, staffers and appointees - over 100 of whom are former industry lobbyists. They don't have to trust him, as long as they can readily manipulate him. What could be better? Someone who could be trusted might have a moral compass, an idea of their own, or a commitment to something. This is MUCH better than that. He's "their boy" all right - and boasts a hard-to-find feature: he can easily disposed of it furthers billionaires' ambitions.
 
Decided I'm going to be more civil. The reasons are pretty self-explanatory.

Funny, I came to the opposite conclusion and decided to be a dirtbag leftist instead of a polite one. What are your reasons (which to me are obviously not self-explanatory since I would like you to explain them)?

The ones you typically hear, that non-civility isn't particularly useful for discourse and I don't see how it could be conductive if the first instinct is to attack rather than understand where a person is coming from, no matter how difficult it might be. If all we do is attack each other that'll only create more division.
 
I thought that Trump would be an interesting and useful experiment in the notion of running the country like a business... unfortunately, it seems to be a crime-family mob-run business, which is not the same thing as "pure capitalism" or whatever. "Transactional" seems more to be "lets forget about the last thing so I can get away with the next thing".
I thought that the American flavor of democracy needed a shakeup... maybe it did.. but what I think I learned most is that the 240 year experiment that is our Republic has met a serious threat, but the design of our system seems to be proving out its resilience.

PyramidHead, I, as a person that caries a handgun regularly as a tool for work, also have invested a lot of research into less than lethal solutions. I found them all lacking in critical ways. My views on gun control have not changed in a very long time. The key, in my opinion is on safety, training, and accountability. I stand by the Automotive Analogy (control guns similarly to how cars are controlled).
 
Decided I'm going to be more civil. The reasons are pretty self-explanatory.

Funny, I came to the opposite conclusion and decided to be a dirtbag leftist instead of a polite one. What are your reasons (which to me are obviously not self-explanatory since I would like you to explain them)?

The ones you typically hear, that non-civility isn't particularly useful for discourse and I don't see how it could be conductive if the first instinct is to attack rather than understand where a person is coming from, no matter how difficult it might be. If all we do is attack each other that'll only create more division.

Adding that it's also simply better for mental health if we're not in attack mode all the damned time. Attack mode is not helping our mental health problem.
 
Decided I'm going to be more civil. The reasons are pretty self-explanatory.

Funny, I came to the opposite conclusion and decided to be a dirtbag leftist instead of a polite one. What are your reasons (which to me are obviously not self-explanatory since I would like you to explain them)?

You are to the left of the majority, but I find you to be extremely polite.
 
Decided I'm going to be more civil. The reasons are pretty self-explanatory.

Funny, I came to the opposite conclusion and decided to be a dirtbag leftist instead of a polite one. What are your reasons (which to me are obviously not self-explanatory since I would like you to explain them)?

You are to the left of the majority, but I find you to be extremely polite.

Thanks! Remember ksen? He was a dirtbag leftist before it was cool (and after reforming himself from a center-right liberal). I guess my beef isn't necessarily with civility but with reverence, and with the way not being strident and emotional is prioritized over everything else even in times of struggle.
 
You are to the left of the majority, but I find you to be extremely polite.

Thanks! Remember ksen? He was a dirtbag leftist before it was cool (and after reforming himself from a center-right liberal). I guess my beef isn't necessarily with civility but with reverence, and with the way not being strident and emotional is prioritized over everything else even in times of struggle.

For the record I do support the use of violence, but in specific situations. Such as in the rise of a dictatorship, or self-defense. I'm not a total pacifist.
 
Globalists? Aren't they the opposite of the nationalists? I know which vision that is most appealing to me...
 
Read the alt-right/nationalist Twitter feed recently. They constantly rail against "globalism".
 
You are to the left of the majority, but I find you to be extremely polite.

Thanks! Remember ksen? He was a dirtbag leftist before it was cool (and after reforming himself from a center-right liberal). I guess my beef isn't necessarily with civility but with reverence, and with the way not being strident and emotional is prioritized over everything else even in times of struggle.

I do remember Ksen. Actually, he started at this forum as a right wing religious guy. We argued age of the earth type issues for a couple years. After awhile he became a skeptic (yea a win for the good guys!). Then, during the down turn he got hurt (like a lot of us) and really swung left. So he went from hating the dems when he was conservative Christian to hating the dems after he'd swung the other way. But regardless, he was a nice guy. Too bad he's gone...
 
Globalists? Aren't they the opposite of the nationalists? I know which vision that is most appealing to me...

Yep, I'm a globalist. Globalism can't be stopped. The world is flat. Globalist friendly countries have a higher GnP, have strong companies, higher standard of living, and are generally more liberal. Nationalists tend to be dogmatic, religious, expansionist and fearful.
 
Globalists? Aren't they the opposite of the nationalists? I know which vision that is most appealing to me...

Yep, I'm a globalist. Globalism can't be stopped. The world is flat. Globalist friendly countries have a higher GnP, have strong companies, higher standard of living, and are generally more liberal. Nationalists tend to be dogmatic, religious, expansionist and fearful.

I agree with you. I am also a globalist. Here is a the KOF Globalization Index from 2018. The top 10 most globalized countries are:

1. Belgium
2. Netherlands
3. Switzerland
4. Sweden
5. Austria
6. Denmark
7. France
8. UK
9. Germany
10. Finland

These countries also score highly in the Human Development Index.
 
Back
Top Bottom