• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Here we go again: another Republican pedophile

Underseer

Contributor
Joined
May 29, 2003
Messages
11,413
Location
Chicago suburbs
Basic Beliefs
atheism, resistentialism
You need to get yourself a dictionary.
giphy.gif
 
Gosh, you're awfully interested in carefully parsing the definition of the word "pedophile" like some kind of desperate lawyer. I wonder why that might be?

I like words and think proper use of them matters.

You, on the other hand are obsessed with finding alleged "pedophiles" everywhere. Are you projecting perhaps?
 
Gosh, you're awfully interested in carefully parsing the definition of the word "pedophile" like some kind of desperate lawyer. I wonder why that might be?

I like words and think proper use of them matters.

You, on the other hand are obsessed with finding alleged "pedophiles" everywhere. Are you projecting perhaps?

Sure. This is all about carefully parsing every word you use and not a sad and desperate attempt to convince yourself that you're not politically in bed with a bunch of utterly depraved perverts.
 
Sure. This is all about carefully parsing every word you use and not a sad and desperate attempt to convince yourself that you're not politically in bed with a bunch of utterly depraved perverts.
I am not a Republican, if that's what you're getting at.
Also, Democrats have their share of perverts too.
 
Sure. This is all about carefully parsing every word you use and not a sad and desperate attempt to convince yourself that you're not politically in bed with a bunch of utterly depraved perverts.
I am not a Republican, if that's what you're getting at.
Also, Democrats have their share of perverts too.

Oh look, a what-aboutism tu quoque fallacy. Just like all the other conservatives and libertarians.

First, someone else being wrong doesn't make you not wrong. The underlying tu quoque fallacy causes your excuse to fail.

Second, even if we ignore the tu quoque fallacy, Democrats are nowhere near as bad unless you give credence to various lunatic claims from the right wing propaganda machine, such as Alex Jones' famous Pizzagate nonsense.

So yeah, your excuse fails every possible way, but it's just adorable seeing you defend pedophiles by carefully parsing the word pedophile like a lawyer. The fact that you get so emotional and triggered at the mere mention of this kind of perversion suggests that deep down even you know the score.

Methinks thou dost protest too much.
 
This is from the horse's mouth:
“I just wanna have fun…I like younger guys. But hell, at my age that’s just about everybody!"

Can someone please explain to me how that means he only likes 14 year old boys?

I will add that in 2000 he was convicted for child porn.

According to a Dec 6th, 2000 article in the Baxter Bulletin, (Mountain Home, Arkansas), page 9:
FAYETTEVILLE (AP) -- A former teacher and pastor in Fayetteville was sentenced Monday to 27 months in prison for possessing at least 10 illegal images of child pornography, including one of a child younger than 12.
Timothy Lee Reddin, 49, pleaded guilty Sept. 8 to one count of possessing child pornography. The items consisted of one Zip disk and 17 diskettes containing the illegal images.
The images were found this spring by a co-worker at Reddin's former job with the Arkansas Rice Depot. In 1998, Reddin resigned as director of missions for the Central Baptist Association in Benton after two people there also found child pornography on Reddin's computer.

So I am going to say this one time. Saying he is not a pedophile is splitting hairs. There is no point to it. Just because some Europeans may have an age of consent thing of some teens or whatever, that is not the kind of person this guy is. He clearly is willing to seek out vulnerable kids, including kids less than ANY AOC AGE. So just shut up already about your hobby horse advocacy. It isn't relevant.

Finally, this is an anti-gay conservative preacher. No, Democrats are not just as bad. Don't give me that BS. This is hypocrisy.

Deal with it.
 
This is from the horse's mouth:
“I just wanna have fun…I like younger guys. But hell, at my age that’s just about everybody!"

Can someone please explain to me how that means he only likes 14 year old boys?

I will add that in 2000 he was convicted for child porn.

According to a Dec 6th, 2000 article in the Baxter Bulletin, (Mountain Home, Arkansas), page 9:
FAYETTEVILLE (AP) -- A former teacher and pastor in Fayetteville was sentenced Monday to 27 months in prison for possessing at least 10 illegal images of child pornography, including one of a child younger than 12.
Timothy Lee Reddin, 49, pleaded guilty Sept. 8 to one count of possessing child pornography. The items consisted of one Zip disk and 17 diskettes containing the illegal images.
The images were found this spring by a co-worker at Reddin's former job with the Arkansas Rice Depot. In 1998, Reddin resigned as director of missions for the Central Baptist Association in Benton after two people there also found child pornography on Reddin's computer.

So I am going to say this one time. Saying he is not a pedophile is splitting hairs. There is no point to it. Just because some Europeans may have an age of consent thing of some teens or whatever, that is not the kind of person this guy is. He clearly is willing to seek out vulnerable kids, including kids less than ANY AOC AGE. So just shut up already about your hobby horse advocacy. It isn't relevant.

Finally, this is an anti-gay conservative preacher. No, Democrats are not just as bad. Don't give me that BS. This is hypocrisy.

Deal with it.

Jesus loves sinners.
 
And yet another one:

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...ndidate-pedophile_us_5b10916de4b0d5e89e1e4824



VA candidate ran a pedophile web site. Guess which party he runs for? Go on, guess!

Time to carefully parse the definition of "pedophile" again! Because all this careful quibbling over exact definitions makes conservatives look like moral, upstanding people, and not a bunch of ichor-dripping slime-bucket perverts.
 
Underseer, when the Democrat Anthony Wiener was caught sending dick picks to a minor female, were you starting threads calling him a "pedophile" as well? Because that would fit your idiosyncratic (but wrong) definition of "pedophilia" that you use for Republicans.
 
Underseer, when the Democrat Anthony Wiener was caught sending dick picks to a minor female, were you starting threads calling him a "pedophile" as well? Because that would fit your idiosyncratic (but wrong) definition of "pedophilia" that you use for Republicans.

Riiiiighttt.....because a 50 year old wanking it to child porn of a boy less than 12 is not a pedophile. What's that noise? Can you hear it? It's me, playing the world's smallest violin for you.
 
Riiiiighttt.....because a 50 year old wanking it to child porn of a boy less than 12 is not a pedophile. What's that noise? Can you hear it? It's me, playing the world's smallest violin for you.
Huh? What are you talking about? Are you not familiar with Underseer's larger obsession with what he thinks is "pedophilia" which includes anybody under 18, and in case of what Jim Jordan may or may not have known about, even young adults?

I never said that Underseer might not occasionally, like the proverbial blind hen, find an actual pedophile. But most of his pedophilia obsession is of the "you keep using that word" type.
 
Riiiiighttt.....because a 50 year old wanking it to child porn of a boy less than 12 is not a pedophile. What's that noise? Can you hear it? It's me, playing the world's smallest violin for you.
Huh? What are you talking about? Are you not familiar with Underseer's larger obsession with what he thinks is "pedophilia" which includes anybody under 18, and in case of what Jim Jordan may or may not have known about, even young adults?

I never said that Underseer might not occasionally, like the proverbial blind hen, find an actual pedophile. But most of his pedophilia obsession is of the "you keep using that word" type.

Stop changing the subject to Underseer. Read my previous post if you honestly don't get it. You should have read the thread anyway.
 
Riiiiighttt.....because a 50 year old wanking it to child porn of a boy less than 12 is not a pedophile. What's that noise? Can you hear it? It's me, playing the world's smallest violin for you.
Huh? What are you talking about? Are you not familiar with Underseer's larger obsession with what he thinks is "pedophilia" which includes anybody under 18, and in case of what Jim Jordan may or may not have known about, even young adults?

I never said that Underseer might not occasionally, like the proverbial blind hen, find an actual pedophile. But most of his pedophilia obsession is of the "you keep using that word" type.

Aw, you poor thing.

Do you hate when people point out how many pedophiles you have on your side?

Does that clash with the narrative you've been getting from your right wing propaganda sources? Is that why you're carefully parsing the word "pedophile" like a lawyer over and over and over as though it will somehow make you look less horrible for defending those disgusting slime buckets? Does it make you feel better about defending yourself if you tell yourself that they are not technically pedophiles?

- - - Updated - - -

The reason I keep throwing these things in your face is that
  1. There are so many such cases (we've barely scratched the surface in this thread) and
  2. I know about that silly little narrative you believe in, and that narrative is why you respond so emotionally to all of this. You bought the narrative and you can't admit to yourself that it's bullshit, so you hope that all of this careful parsing will somehow justify that ridiculous narrative in your head.

- - - Updated - - -

http://goodizen.com/list-of-convicted-republican-pedophiles/

article said:
List Of Convicted Republican Pedophiles

And that's just the ones that have been convicted. Goodness knows how many Republican NAMBLA members and NAMGLA members got away with it.
 
Back
Top Bottom