• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

How Much/How Many Republicans are Truly Well Intended?

A thought on what is going on.

On a more conservative place I was criticized as a leecher for supporting Obamacare.

The attitude of the person changed when I pointed out the facts: I had paid into the system for decades and involuntarily lost my coverage when my employer folded--and at that point the response of the individual market was "please feel free to reapply when you have a diagnosis." Since then I've only found 1099 work--no insurance. What was I supposed to have done differently??

While he understood my case was reasonable he felt that I was the exception--never mind the fact that most of the uninsurable population is like me, developed health problems and then lost their coverage involuntarily. (Note that there is also an uninsured population that simply doesn't want to pay for it even though they could.)

I think much of their lack of empathy stems from this sort of thought. When confronted with the facts they think it's an exception, not reality. They also tend to have seriously messed up views of what's needed (for example, a guy suggesting UHC that covers primary care docs only, no specialists) and what's available (for example, a guy who kept insisting that the ER would treat any patient, emergency or not. That despite being smacked around six ways from Sunday for holding that position.)

They are so determined that anything remotely resembling a handout is going to 99% leechers that the lack of empathy makes sense.
 
A thought on what is going on.

On a more conservative place I was criticized as a leecher for supporting Obamacare.

The attitude of the person changed when I pointed out the facts: I had paid into the system for decades and involuntarily lost my coverage when my employer folded--and at that point the response of the individual market was "please feel free to reapply when you have a diagnosis." Since then I've only found 1099 work--no insurance. What was I supposed to have done differently??

While he understood my case was reasonable he felt that I was the exception--never mind the fact that most of the uninsurable population is like me, developed health problems and then lost their coverage involuntarily. (Note that there is also an uninsured population that simply doesn't want to pay for it even though they could.)

I think much of their lack of empathy stems from this sort of thought. When confronted with the facts they think it's an exception, not reality. They also tend to have seriously messed up views of what's needed (for example, a guy suggesting UHC that covers primary care docs only, no specialists) and what's available (for example, a guy who kept insisting that the ER would treat any patient, emergency or not. That despite being smacked around six ways from Sunday for holding that position.)

They are so determined that anything remotely resembling a handout is going to 99% leechers that the lack of empathy makes sense.

First, I am truly sorry for the harm that you experienced for losing your insurance - and your employer. (I think the whole healthcare system is a bit more than $100,000k in the black due to my participation, and now, if not for Medicare I'd be uninsured myself.) Second, I think you're on to something there... though I'm not so sure it's about feeling ripped off by freeloaders so much as feeling lost in the complexity of how those presumed freeloaders are enabled.
Ronburgundy observes "It is a lot like the religious belief that gays will go to hell (not coincidentally a belief held mostly by conservatives). This absurd belief doesn't make ill-intentioned actions to harm gays really a loving action to "save their souls". The belief itself is actually an immoral result of self-serving delusion maintained to rationalize harming gays in service of protecting the order and their simplistic authoritarian notions of morality they prefer."
I think he's talking about the same thing - an innate preference for simple answers and simple algorithms that will indicate the "proper" path with total certainty, in all situations. IOW, they have abdicated all moral and ethical responsibility, and are happy to simply do as they are told. Doubly so when they are told that obeisance will result in great rewards - be it great wealth, 72 virgins in an afterlife or something else.
 
Healthcare is a human right, and we should all contribute what we can, and all benefit as we need. You'd be amazed at how much cheaper that is than all the spite against the poor, which is what leaves you with such a silly system.
 
Back
Top Bottom