barbos
Contributor
No, we did not, we did not even enter Finland, during WW2 that isRussia turned Finland into a pile of rubble during World War 2. Everybody in that country carries generational deep scars from that war. Everybody.
No, we did not, we did not even enter Finland, during WW2 that isRussia turned Finland into a pile of rubble during World War 2. Everybody in that country carries generational deep scars from that war. Everybody.
really? you refer to finnish media? really?Well, which one of us lives in Finland, follows the Finnish media and talk to the Finnish people?
We are not worried about a thousand drunken sailors from UK/Germany/US landing in Finland.As to your claim that Finland would try to promise Russia that there would not be major NATO forces, it is not true. This very day the news has it that Finland wants to have NATO Forward Land Forces deployed in the country.
If you stop invading other countries, you won't have to worry about their military hardware.We are not worried about a thousand drunken sailors from UK/Germany/US landing in Finland.As to your claim that Finland would try to promise Russia that there would not be major NATO forces, it is not true. This very day the news has it that Finland wants to have NATO Forward Land Forces deployed in the country.
We are worried about certain types of military hardware.
No, we did not, we did not even enter Finland, during WW2 that isRussia turned Finland into a pile of rubble during World War 2. Everybody in that country carries generational deep scars from that war. Everybody.
really? you refer to finnish media? really?Well, which one of us lives in Finland, follows the Finnish media and talk to the Finnish people?
Your english is not that bad, but you don't seem to know the meaning of a word "believe". So I am confused.
By the way, congratulations, on your 10th post!
If you learn some history and background you would stop posting like this BSIf you stop invading other countries, you won't have to worry about their military hardware.We are not worried about a thousand drunken sailors from UK/Germany/US landing in Finland.As to your claim that Finland would try to promise Russia that there would not be major NATO forces, it is not true. This very day the news has it that Finland wants to have NATO Forward Land Forces deployed in the country.
We are worried about certain types of military hardware.
Nuances, nuances, my finnish comrade.First part is true, Russia did not turn Finland into a pile of rubble. The second part is patently absurd, as the Red Army invaded Finland in 1939
We are not worried about a thousand drunken sailors from UK/Germany/US landing in Finland.As to your claim that Finland would try to promise Russia that there would not be major NATO forces, it is not true. This very day the news has it that Finland wants to have NATO Forward Land Forces deployed in the country.
We are worried about certain types of military hardware.
Why would a person living in Finland refer to their media to learn what people think?Yes, I refer to the Finnish media as a credible source of what the people feel here. Much better for that than the Russian media.
Nuance as "did not even enter Finland" equals to "Brutally invaded to conquer"?Nuances, nuances, my finnish comrade.First part is true, Russia did not turn Finland into a pile of rubble. The second part is patently absurd, as the Red Army invaded Finland in 1939
F35s is not on the list of really worrisome hardware. You should know that, Finnish media you trust should have informed you.We are not worried about a thousand drunken sailors from UK/Germany/US landing in Finland.As to your claim that Finland would try to promise Russia that there would not be major NATO forces, it is not true. This very day the news has it that Finland wants to have NATO Forward Land Forces deployed in the country.
We are worried about certain types of military hardware.
How do you like F-35s based 25 min flight away from St.Putinsburg?
That's not what happened.Nuance as "did not even enter Finland" equals to "Brutally invaded to conquer"?Nuances, nuances, my finnish comrade.First part is true, Russia did not turn Finland into a pile of rubble. The second part is patently absurd, as the Red Army invaded Finland in 1939
There was just European elections. Before that lots of opinions were expressed.Why would a person living in Finland refer to their media to learn what people think?Yes, I refer to the Finnish media as a credible source of what the people feel here. Much better for that than the Russian media.
That's not what happened.Nuance as "did not even enter Finland" equals to "Brutally invaded to conquer"?Nuances, nuances, my finnish comrade.First part is true, Russia did not turn Finland into a pile of rubble. The second part is patently absurd, as the Red Army invaded Finland in 1939
And russo-phobes lost. Your point?There was just European elections. Before that lots of opinions were expressed.
And I am still confused. I asked you to clarify and still have not.\But you stated earlier that you were confused.
Have you been been missing last 80 years? Finland eventually fought Nazi Germany and had had great relationship with USSR afterwards.That's not what happened.Nuance as "did not even enter Finland" equals to "Brutally invaded to conquer"?Nuances, nuances, my finnish comrade.First part is true, Russia did not turn Finland into a pile of rubble. The second part is patently absurd, as the Red Army invaded Finland in 1939
Tell that to the 300 000+ Soviet (not all were Russian) troops that got killed or wounded while it was not happening.
And russo-phobes lost. Your point?There was just European elections. Before that lots of opinions were expressed.
And I am still confused. I asked you to clarify and still have not.\But you stated earlier that you were confused.
So one is left wondering why Russia - more specifically Putin - would do such a stupid thing. IMHO the likely explanation is that Putin was getting cold feet. He's a criminal of the highest order, no different from Hitler, and realized western freedom and accountability was closing in. In his infantile mind he had no better option. And he's willing to kill as many as it takes, including his own countrymen, same as Hitler, to escape accountability.The support of NATO membership shot through the roof after the illegal Russian invasion of Ukraine. The pre-invasion wisdom here was that economic ties would secure peace, but that mode of thinking died the day Russia invaded Ukraine.
Have you been been missing last 80 years? Finland eventually fought Nazi Germany and had had great relationship with USSR afterwards.Tell that to the 300 000+ Soviet (not all were Russian) troops that got killed or wounded while it was not happening.
Dude, JayJay agreed with me, go talk to him.Have you been been missing last 80 years? Finland eventually fought Nazi Germany and had had great relationship with USSR afterwards.Tell that to the 300 000+ Soviet (not all were Russian) troops that got killed or wounded while it was not happening.
Yes, eventually fought the Germans, but that does not change the fact that the Soviets started a war of aggression against Finland in 1939 and did enter the country, losing 300 000+ in KIA, WIA and MIA by March 1940. You claimed that they did not even enter the country.