The Doctrine of Fascism is the essence of Fascism and is without violence or racism, therefore Fascism in it's intrinsic nature is peaceful.
Democracy is racist and violent by your logic, because look at all the racist laws we had in America, genocide of Indians, and the terrorist attacks on civilians when we dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
No, that was not a reflection of Democracy. Neither is behavior of Fascists a reflection of the intrinsic nature and essence of Fascism.
The Doctrine of Fascism has no violence, so...
So how come all fascist dictatorships ended up being incredibly violent, constantly searching for anything weak to attack. Italy wasn't the only fascist state. Argentina under Peron. Chile under Pinochet. Syria under Assad. Iraq under Saddam. Turkey under Atatürk. Spain under Franco. Japan under Kunoye. Hungary under Horthy. While Germany under Hitler technically isn't fascism. It certainly comes pretty damn close. Not to mention the large group of fascist dictators in banana republics and in Africa.
All very similar. All a complete shit show of corrupt governments committing gross acts of violence upon it's own population and most often others.
If the doctrine of fascism doesn't preach violence, how come that's always how it's ended up being? They're ALL the same. There's no example of a fascist state that hasn't turned into an orgy of violence upon it's own population. And the degree of violence is another point. They're unsurpassed in the grotesqueness of the violence. Their torture methods are the cruelest humanity has ever devised. And they didn't hesitate to use it. They would execute people for the mildest of transgressions.
Your point of fascism being a peaceful ideology is a hard sell. You'd might as well convince me that Stalin was the friend of the working class.
