http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0969725X.2015.1065124
Should we make such a presupposition? And really, there's too much controversy regarding open-system motifs in affect theory to be stated so cavalierly.
So if I understand that it argues that workers in a capitalist economy will feel bad. Is that was it says?
I like the Einstein quote, "if you can't say something simply then you don't understand it well"
So if I understand that it argues that workers in a capitalist economy will feel bad. Is that was it says?
I like the Einstein quote, "if you can't say something simply then you don't understand it well"
Actually, what it says is "I, the author, am far smarter and know more big words than you, so you shouldn't even attempt to understand what I am saying, but should simply agree wholeheartedly, lest you appear less educated than I. Now give me more grant money."
Of course it was far more eloquent when expressed as the original interpretive dance.
Actually, what it says is "I, the author, am far smarter and know more big words than you, so you shouldn't even attempt to understand what I am saying, but should simply agree wholeheartedly, lest you appear less educated than I. Now give me more grant money."
Of course it was far more eloquent when expressed as the original interpretive dance.
I strongly doubt Karyn (yup, that's her name) understands all those words. There's also some odd combos there making the meaning vague. Prediction, she's not going to get a qualified job, ever.
I strongly doubt Karyn (yup, that's her name) understands all those words. There's also some odd combos there making the meaning vague. Prediction, she's not going to get a qualified job, ever.
Sometimes people use long words that they don't understand. They think it makes them seem more photosynthesis.
So if I understand that it argues that workers in a capitalist economy will feel bad. Is that was it says?
I like the Einstein quote, "if you can't say something simply then you don't understand it well"
Actually, what it says is "I, the author, am far smarter and know more big words than you, so you shouldn't even attempt to understand what I am saying, but should simply agree wholeheartedly, lest you appear less educated than I. Now give me more grant money."
Of course it was far more eloquent when expressed as the original interpretive dance.