Is white genocide in our future?

[Half-Life]

Youtube comments? Again?

Jesus fuck, dude.

IKR? And seriously, I've detailed maybe 10-15 times now on these very forums the phenomena of how people predictably get indoctrinated into racism against their own race, not to mention others (particularly in the case of MAGA against people of Hispanic descent, though also other forms of non-race prejudice and intimidation).

It usually goes something along the lines of "the messages presented to society which create white racist thought against black people is also something black people are exposed, and as equally capable humans, certainly not immune to."

But Halfie has a pretty strong case of "political amnesia", where some may forget an argument after a matter of days, I suspect he could blank one out after a matter of seconds.

When you have hundreds of likes over a comment such as, "I'm a black Trump supporter" on right-wing channels, I can assure you it's not left-wing trolls swarming in by the hundreds just to like that post.

 

[Jarhyn]

Youtube comments? Again?

Jesus fuck, dude.

IKR? And seriously, I've detailed maybe 10-15 times now on these very forums the phenomena of how people predictably get indoctrinated into racism against their own race, not to mention others (particularly in the case of MAGA against people of Hispanic descent, though also other forms of non-race prejudice and intimidation).

It usually goes something along the lines of "the messages presented to society which create white racist thought against black people is also something black people are exposed, and as equally capable humans, certainly not immune to."

But Halfie has a pretty strong case of "political amnesia", where some may forget an argument after a matter of days, I suspect he could blank one out after a matter of seconds.

When you have hundreds of likes over a comment such as, "I'm a black Trump supporter" on right-wing channels, I can assure you it's not left-wing trolls swarming in by the hundreds just to like that post.

To quote a great man:

"Youtube comments? Again?

Jesus fuck, dude."

Or in other words, of course racist assholes will upvote the Uncle Tom. They need the occasional self-hating racist; it's the fig-leaf. In fact it's such a common trope that there's a name for it: TOKEN.

 

[Half-Life]

When you have hundreds of likes over a comment such as, "I'm a black Trump supporter" on right-wing channels, I can assure you it's not left-wing trolls swarming in by the hundreds just to like that post.

To quote a great man:

"Youtube comments? Again?

Jesus fuck, dude."

Or in other words, of course racist assholes will upvote the Uncle Tom. They need the occasional self-hating racist; it's the fig-leaf. In fact it's such a common trope that there's a name for it: TOKEN.

But, I thought you guys say skin color doesn't matter? Now you are saying skin color does matter because "Uncle Tom's" don't stick with the blacks? Sounds a tad bit racist and hypocritical, don't you think?

Are these Uncle Toms similar to the self-hating whites on this forum who claim the white race isn't worth saving?

 

[Jarhyn]

When you have hundreds of likes over a comment such as, "I'm a black Trump supporter" on right-wing channels, I can assure you it's not left-wing trolls swarming in by the hundreds just to like that post.

To quote a great man:

"Youtube comments? Again?

Jesus fuck, dude."

Or in other words, of course racist assholes will upvote the Uncle Tom. They need the occasional self-hating racist; it's the fig-leaf. In fact it's such a common trope that there's a name for it: TOKEN.

But, I thought you guys say skin color doesn't matter? Now you are saying skin color does matter because "Uncle Tom's" don't stick with the blacks? Sounds a tad bit racist and hypocritical, don't you think?

Are these Uncle Toms similar to the self-hating whites on this forum who claim the white race isn't worth saving?

Nobody claims that the "white race" "isn't worth saving". Most of us realize that "the white race" can only possibly be improved through the inclusion of traits extant in other tribes, because of how natural selection works.

You're not-even-wrong.

 

[Keith&Co.]

the self-hating whites on this forum who claim the white race isn't worth saving?

no.
Uncle Tom designates people who actually exist.
The "self-hating whites on this forum who claim the white race isn't worth saving" are a figment of either your imagination or incredibly poor reading skills.

People are not saying what you accuse after 'you are essentially saying...'

Ever.

 

[laughing dog]

There is an old internet saying that goes "Watch out where the huskies go, and do not feed the stupid troll".

 

[Half-Life]

But, I thought you guys say skin color doesn't matter? Now you are saying skin color does matter because "Uncle Tom's" don't stick with the blacks? Sounds a tad bit racist and hypocritical, don't you think?

Are these Uncle Toms similar to the self-hating whites on this forum who claim the white race isn't worth saving?

Nobody claims that the "white race" "isn't worth saving". Most of us realize that "the white race" can only possibly be improved through the inclusion of traits extant in other tribes, because of how natural selection works.

You're not-even-wrong.

That is code for, "the white race will be gone once we get the majority of people to have mixed race kids."

That's like saying, "the black race will improve when we get traits from other races in there."
That would sound like a plan to make blacks go extinct, would it not?

 

[Jarhyn]

But, I thought you guys say skin color doesn't matter? Now you are saying skin color does matter because "Uncle Tom's" don't stick with the blacks? Sounds a tad bit racist and hypocritical, don't you think?

Are these Uncle Toms similar to the self-hating whites on this forum who claim the white race isn't worth saving?

Nobody claims that the "white race" "isn't worth saving". Most of us realize that "the white race" can only possibly be improved through the inclusion of traits extant in other tribes, because of how natural selection works.

You're not-even-wrong.

That is code for, "the white race will be gone once we get the majority of people to have mixed race kids."

That's like saying, "the black race will improve when we get traits from other races in there."
That would sound like a plan to make blacks go extinct, would it not?

Not-even-wrong, again.

First, all I or anyone o. The left advocates is letting people live and love and make babies with whoever they want, and encouraging open-mindedness in whoever they find that attraction to. IF that resulted in the majority of kids being born between parents who look different from each other, all those traits would continue to exist and be expressed in individuals. Individuals with traits that worked well together would trend toward success, and individuals whose traits work poorly together would not. All the traits would be retained in some fraction of society at some level roughly commensurate to their survival and attractiveness value within the population.

And yes, "the black race" is not immune to gaining beneficial traits in this manner. The way they get there, though, is still bilateral, through mutual attraction. It would not make THOSE genetics "go extinct" either.

The whole concept of races "going extinct" through consensual interbreeding is nonsense. A much more apt description would be "going temporarily *indistinct*".

Eventually, assuming that the world stabilizes, people will start staying where they are and selection pressures will cause locally beneficial traits to gain dominance again, while globally useful traits will be commonly held, again causing distinction to re-emerge, though likely with different permutations of traits.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

I know right? And what privilege is that, exactly, the privilege of getting murdered by ignorant assholes?

Shit. My trans husband already almost got jumped once this year, must be all that "privilege". I'd hate to be my ex, who IS a black trans woman. Maybe I should ask her how "privileged" our society makes her feel.

Of course some people are dicks. MAGA people have to look for places online that have been designated free from harassment because it's gotten so bad for us.Look up all the cases of people being yelled and screamed at and threatened just because they wore a MAGA hat. It's sad the world today is becoming so sissified that even a hat offends snowflakes.

You look for places that are MAGA echo chambers rather than places where truth is spoken.

But look at Jussie Smollett. He got no jail time for his fake hate crime even though law says you should go to jail for faking crimes. That's an example of black gay privilege.

First offenses by the well-to-do often draw very light punishment, especially when the knowledge of the act causes considerable harm to their position.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

What are you talking about? People who go to a coffee shop with a MAGA hat are not looking to oppress anyone. They just want coffee.

Are you confused?

Let's put it this way. Suppose you are working the counter at a Starbucks. A man comes in wearing a MAGA hat. Are you telling me it is rational to immediately start yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs "get out!" like a 5 year old?

I'm sure that would look real good to right-wingers and undecided voters.

MAGA hats are basically symbols of a desire to oppress. They're like KKK robes minus the anonymity.

 

[Keith&Co.]

That's like saying, "the black race will improve when we get traits from other races in there."
That would sound like a plan to make blacks go extinct, would it not?

No, it does not.
You don't make anything 'go extinct' by successfully having offspring.
People having further generations of kids is NOT a path to or a plan for extinction, nor any form of genocide.
it IS a worry for racists who think that their race needs to be racially pure. Because racism.
But then again, genes flow downstream.

1) No amount of mixed-race heritage will ever flow back upstream to make you any less white than you already are.

2) This is only even tangentially a concern for people who will have offspring.

 

[Half-Life]

What are you talking about? People who go to a coffee shop with a MAGA hat are not looking to oppress anyone. They just want coffee.

Are you confused?

Let's put it this way. Suppose you are working the counter at a Starbucks. A man comes in wearing a MAGA hat. Are you telling me it is rational to immediately start yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs "get out!" like a 5 year old?

I'm sure that would look real good to right-wingers and undecided voters.

MAGA hats are basically symbols of a desire to oppress. They're like KKK robes minus the anonymity.

That is pure delusion!

Remember the Covington kids? The BLACK ISRAELITES were screaming, "THE WHITE MAN IS THE BIGGEST TERRORIST ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH!" Did the media spend hours dissecting their vile disgusting racism? Nope. They instead said that a white kid in a MAGA hat who was smiling at a Native American is a vie disgusting racist.

Now, just imagine it was reversed and a group of white men were shouting, "THE BLACK MAN IS THE BIGGEST TERRORIST ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH!!" The media would've hung those whites out to dry and left them for dead. But, blacks can get away with being racist. I suppose it's some kind of magical part of being black or something.

Extremely idiotic. Why do you think the right gets fed up with this nonsense?

 

[Half-Life]

You look for places that are MAGA echo chambers rather than places where truth is spoken.

But look at Jussie Smollett. He got no jail time for his fake hate crime even though law says you should go to jail for faking crimes. That's an example of black gay privilege.

First offenses by the well-to-do often draw very light punishment, especially when the knowledge of the act causes considerable harm to their position.

This forum is an echo chamber. How often do you go to right-wing channels and post, "you guys are racists!" so you can see all the rebuttals to your claim?

 

[Jarhyn]

What are you talking about? People who go to a coffee shop with a MAGA hat are not looking to oppress anyone. They just want coffee.

Are you confused?

Let's put it this way. Suppose you are working the counter at a Starbucks. A man comes in wearing a MAGA hat. Are you telling me it is rational to immediately start yelling and screaming at the top of your lungs "get out!" like a 5 year old?

I'm sure that would look real good to right-wingers and undecided voters.

MAGA hats are basically symbols of a desire to oppress. They're like KKK robes minus the anonymity.

That is pure delusion!

Remember the Covington kids? The BLACK ISRAELITES were screaming, "THE WHITE MAN IS THE BIGGEST TERRORIST ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH!" Did the media spend hours dissecting their vile disgusting racism? Nope. They instead said that a white kid in a MAGA hat who was smiling at a Native American is a vie disgusting racist.

Now, just imagine it was reversed and a group of white men were shouting, "THE BLACK MAN IS THE BIGGEST TERRORIST ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH!!" The media would've hung those whites out to dry and left them for dead. But, blacks can get away with being racist. I suppose it's some kind of magical part of being black or something.

Extremely idiotic. Why do you think the right gets fed up with this nonsense?

Dude. The black Isrealites are one of the textbook examples I post about how black people can be racist. I see someone from their church in my city and I immediately take stock of whatever might be near in case there is a confrontation.

If their clothes can be a communication as effective as a KKK hood that someone is hostile, so too is a MAGA hat.

As to white people talking about brown terrorists... Well, have YOU been hung out to dry and left for dead?

No?

Then STFU.

 

[Keith&Co.]

You look for places that are MAGA echo chambers rather than places where truth is spoken.

But look at Jussie Smollett. He got no jail time for his fake hate crime even though law says you should go to jail for faking crimes. That's an example of black gay privilege.

First offenses by the well-to-do often draw very light punishment, especially when the knowledge of the act causes considerable harm to their position.

This forum is an echo chamber. How often do you go to right-wing channels and post, "you guys are racists!" so you can see all the rebuttals to your claim?

One rebuttal would be useful.
Flat rejection, denial, nuh-uh != rebuttal.
'What if' stories, alternate histories, mirror universes != rebuttal.
Other oeople being just as racist has zip-point-shit to do with proving you are not racist.
"No, YOU!" isn't even a third grade argument.

 

[SimpleDon]

Is white genocide in our future?

Thanks to this discussion board I learned about the "Great Replacement Theory." That the Democrats support open borders in order to let in illegal immigrants to vote for Democrats. I had the crazy idea that most illegals enter the US to work.

Now the board opens my eyes to the white genocide, where the global elites are not going to kill the white race but are going to sap the essential fluids of the white race by forcing them to inter-marry with the sub-humans of the not-white races.

As in anything that is new to me I turn to my friend Google to understand it better. I am sure that this is the way that most of you do it.

The ADL, #1 in my Google search, says

“White Genocide” is a term coined by white supremacists for propaganda purposes as shorthand for one of the most deeply held modern white supremacist convictions: that the white race is “dying” due to growing non-white populations and “forced assimilation,” all of which are deliberately engineered and controlled by a Jewish conspiracy to destroy the white race. This same conviction can be seen in the so-called “14 Words” slogan, the most popular white supremacist slogan around the globe: “We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.” White supremacists commonly claim that they must take action, even violent action, or the “white race” will “perish from the Earth.”

I would say that the description is decidedly negative. But it is from the ADL. The ADL is the Jewish anti-defamation league and, of course, they might be mad that someone exposed their conspiracy, so I went to the next non-Wiki, non-Twitter-hashtag source.

Harper's Magazine, A Letter from South Africa The Myth of White Genocide, subtitled An unfinished civil war inspires a global delusion This is getting somewhere. But this article has a lot of useless paragraphs, written to prove that Harper's either doesn't have any editors or that they don't pay authors by the word.

... Even a quarter-century after the end of apartheid, 72 percent of privately held farmland in South Africa is owned by whites, who now make up just 8 percent of the country’s population of over fifty-six million. Blacks, 81 percent of South Africa’s population, own only 4 percent of the country’s rural land. It’s this imbalance that has led as many as five million squatters to occupy land like that in Lawley over the last two decades. ...

... Under pressure from EFF (the political party pushing for land expropriation) and its supporters, the business-friendly, moderate president, Cyril Ramaphosa, adopted a policy of “expropriation without compensation” last winter, and began the process of changing the country’s constitution to allow for land seizures. ...

... He (The EFF guide to the squatters' settlement) told us that this land they’d seized mostly belonged to the state, though he admitted pockets had been owned by white war veterans who’d been granted it as a reward for service by the apartheid government.

“The way it is now, the whites have a great deal of land,” Ramokgola said. “Whereas the black, you think should be having the majority of this land—we don’t have anything. Land expropriation is the only answer that we can see. But we want to say: there is no one who is being persecuted—we are not killing anyone, we are not fighting anyone. We are only taking what we think is ours.”

To the extent that news about land reform in South Africa has reached international audiences at all, it’s been refracted through the lens of a narrative promoted by white conservatives about a supposed “white genocide”—killings of mostly Afrikaner farmers—equating land redistribution with a race war. Even though there’s no direct connection between murders of white farmers and land reform, an idea has nonetheless taken hold in the international media of landowners under murderous assault by the black masses, the clearest symbol that in twenty-five years of post-apartheid majority rule whites have become a persecuted minority.

It’s easy to forget today, in the years since Nelson Mandela has become a secular liberal saint, that the victory over apartheid was not a product of tidy pacifist resistance to political injustice. The ANC’s guiding Freedom Charter, adopted in 1955, declared the need for land redistribution—“The Land Shall Be Shared Among Those Who Work It!”—and the document is a revolutionary manifesto, calling not just for democracy and political equality but for the redistribution of land and the nationalization of mines and industry. The charter recognized that political equality would be meaningless without wealth redistribution since whites had long ago handed themselves control of the country’s natural resources ...

Today, fourteen million South Africans live in extreme poverty, often in informal settlements or conditions that are no better. There are a tiny number of whites who live in squatter camps—13,310 of them, according to a 2016 government estimate—and the plight of this minute slice of the South African poor has been very heavily reported on. In 2013, the BBC repeated a wildly inflated estimate by “Afrikaner-rights” activists that up to four hundred thousand whites were living in camps, which is a number that it later became clear the activists had made up more or less on the spot. It has now been repeated countless times, but it’s hard to find much reporting at all about the conditions of the millions of blacks living in camps.

With the population growing rapidly and migration still ongoing, the land issue has exploded. One notorious settlement I saw in Johannesburg, called Diepsloot, is home to over one hundred fifty thousand people. There are millions upon millions of people with nowhere to go in a country where everywhere you look there are vast tracts of wide-open, white-owned land, occupied by nothing but sheep and wandering guinea fowl. ...

... the dark part is how hard it is to understand the attacks: Why would people force children to watch their mother gang-rape, creep up to shoot an old couple as they sleep in the bed, force a twelve-*year-*old into a bathtub and drown him in boiling water?

It’s a simple fact that there is an element of racial vitriol to some murders of white farmers. One recent attack came two months after vandals painted the words “Kill the Boer,” which is the title of a favorite song of Malema’s (the founder and head of the EFF), on the door of the victims’ farmhouse. The attacks are often elaborately and senselessly violent. But farmers are only one of a broad host of people in South Africa who are at a high risk of being murdered—night-shift workers and Uber drivers, for example, are in greater statistical danger. And international media, which have amplified the idea that so-called farm murders are a major concern, has been oblivious to a key fact: last year, in a country where almost twenty thousand people were slain, most of them black, there were only sixty-two farm murders, according to government statistics. Sixty-two. According to one of the country’s largest agricultural associations, murders of farmers are at a twenty-year low. And not all of the victims are even white. In a town called Krugersdorp, I investigated the recent killing of a man named Aron Mutavhatsindi. His alleged murder took place on a farm, but he was black—shot at range by a white security guard who saw him driving a tractor and decided that he was stealing it.

So how is it that the land question and “farm murder” narrative became intertwined? The answer, to a large extent, is a man named Simon Roche, a leader of a Christian survivalist group, the Suidlanders (pronounced Seit-landers, and meaning southlanders in Afrikaans), who claim over one hundred thousand members or supporters, all white, and who have forged deep ties to American white supremacists and far-right figures such as Alex Jones. Roche has worked to link—especially to credulous international audiences—the issue of farm attacks with the threat of land expropriation. Malema has played on this theme, too—once tweeting “maybe, maybe not” when he was accused of encouraging farm attacks—but the truth is that most land occupations happen peacefully, and there appears to be no record of an EFF-led occupation resulting in murder. Farm murders happen, but they have little to do directly with land occupations.

Once again, quite negative for the theory of white genocide. There is much after the examples above.

I read many articles after the one in Harper's. They are listed below. They all were negative. It is not looking good for the theory of "White Genocide."

The liberal media is obviously trying to kill off the conservatives' theory with their insistence on facts, and their discounting of what the conservatives just know in their hearts has to be right.

The Atlantic's White Nationalism’s Deep American Roots discussed the shooter in the Pittsburg synagogue, Robert Bowers, belief in the 'specter of white Americans facing “genocide"' as the reason he shot 11 people dead on October 27, 2018. He singled out HIAS, a Jewish American refugee-support group, and accused it of bringing “invaders in that kill our people.” The article goes on to discuss the American Madison Grant. He was the author of a 1916 book called The Passing of the Great Race, which spread the doctrine of race purity all over the globe. Hilter called the book his bible for his race-based socialism, the idea that it was the state's job is not to run the economy, but to keep the nation's population society's members racially pure. That it is Grant's thesis that has been rejuvenated into today's white genocide theory.

Next was in the Journal of Genocide Research, paper entitled "White Genocide" and the Ethics of Public Analysis which used as its genesis the mass murder of 50 Muslims in Christchurch, New Zealand by the Australian white supremacist Brenton Tarrant. You would expect a researcher of genocide would be happy to discover a new genocide to study. But the author of this reflection, which I assume is Australian research journal nomenclature for 'commentary,' is openly dismissive of the claims of an impending genocide of white people. He does make a statement that supports my pet conspiracy theory that the right is encouraging the fear of immigrants among its supporters.

Centre-right politicians and journalists are wary about taking them (Tarrant's ideas) seriously because they also have been busy panicking populations with catastrophic declarations about Muslim immigration, and about the imminent collapse of "Western Civilization" due to the "war" that academics and feminists supposedly wage on it with their "cultural Marxism" and "political correctness." He (Tarrant) is thus dismissed as a misfit and a loner, a crazed product of an isolated, extremist milieu with no links to the mainstream, his violence "senseless." Irrational rather than rational, by this comfortable assumption Tarrant's thought as the source of his "hate" does not warrant investigation. In one notably myopic deflection and displacement tactic, a senior journalist ascribed Tarrant's nationalism to the "identity politics" he thinks leftists are responsible for introducing into the body politic after 1968 and their inexorable march through the institutions.

Finally, my last one in sequence, from the SPLC, the Southern Poverty Law Center, [/i]SPLC to Congress: Myth of ‘white genocide’ driving white nationalist terror attacks[/i], testimony to Congress, June 4, 2019. This is short, you can read it for yourself. It is negative, which you probably knew from the title.

I hadn't found any support for the concept of white genocide so I looked for it ahead and found support on the second page, White Genocide Info, which is also its web site address, www.whitegenocide.info. This is not a single article like the others, it is a complete web site with a lot of content, albeit most of it is links to other web sites. I have only sampled it obviously.

But the statement below is on the first page of their web site, below a picture representing the discredited farmers murdered in South Africa so-called problem. I guess they don't read Harper's.

Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY White country and ONLY into White countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY White country and ONLY White countries to "assimilate," i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY Black country and ONLY into Black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I'm not talking about a RACE problem, I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black person to notice this and what kind of psycho black person wouldn't object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the White race, Liberals and Cuckservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-White.

"ANTI-RACIST" is a code word for ANTI-WHITE

"DIVERSITY" is a code word for WHITE GENOCIDE

This is obviously a strong argument in support of the theory, just look at the number of words in all caps and the powerful use of scare quotes.

I also learned on this site that it wasn't the leftists, the Democrats, the global elites or the Jews who were sponsoring the White Genocide. It is in fact one man who is a leftist, a Democrat, and a Jew, and presumably a global elite, George Soros. They linked to an article on the Breitbart news web site Hungarian PM Slams Soros-Funded Advocacy Groups: They “Are Drawing A Living From The Immigration Crisis”.

... Soros – who has backed left-wing causes like the Center for American Progress, MoveOn.org, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama – also gives billions of dollars to advocacy groups across Europe and Africa. He is a firm backer of the European Union and the Euro as a currency and a key backer of the left-leaning London School of Economics. His Open Society Foundation has also given money to pro-EU, pro-migrant groups like British Future, which has campaigned against UKIP and eurosceptic groups.

(The LSE was founded as a Fabian society school, i.e. a socialist-leaning school. But like many many schools of economics, it has been pulled to the right since the 1970s, in order to attract more money from the wealthy who tend to fund only right-wing fantasies of the economy. It was the source of Tony Blair's and Bill Clinton's "Third Way" centrist policies between the welfare state and the unfettered free market.)

I read a lot more of the articles linked to in the WGI web site. Most from Breitbart, the Daily Stormer (no link to it, my virus protection lit up when I loaded it), RT- of course, , The Truth Seeker,The Daily Caller, and the Occidential Decent - Nationalism, Populism, Reaction.

I reached the following conclusions about them;

• they aren't overloaded with facts to support their assertions
• the articles are brief
• while brief, they contain a lot of repetition in the article itself
• and with the other web sites, the echo chamber
• you don't want to read the comments with the articles
• not ever

 

[Half-Life]

That was one of the facts. Blacks don't know how to farm as well as whites and had to rely on whites to farm for them or they would starve. Does that sound like the whites are trying to kill off the blacks? Or help them?

It's like a border collie helping a bulldog. Bulldogs aren't very bright and border collies are known to be the smartest breed of dog. Don't you dare call me a "breedist!" against bulldogs for saying this.

 

[laughing dog]

That was one of the facts. Blacks don't know how to farm as well as whites and had to rely on whites to farm for them or they would starve. Does that sound like the whites are trying to kill off the blacks? Or help them?

WTF are you babbling about?

It's like a border collie helping a bulldog. Bulldogs aren't very bright and border collies are known to be the smartest breed of dog. Don't you dare call me a "breedist!" against bulldogs for saying this.

That is total bs. Intelligence, in dogs or humans, is multifaceted. Border collie's are very easy trainable, but that is not the only definition of intelligence.

 

[Half-Life]

That was one of the facts. Blacks don't know how to farm as well as whites and had to rely on whites to farm for them or they would starve. Does that sound like the whites are trying to kill off the blacks? Or help them?

WTF are you babbling about?

It's like a border collie helping a bulldog. Bulldogs aren't very bright and border collies are known to be the smartest breed of dog. Don't you dare call me a "breedist!" against bulldogs for saying this.

That is total bs. Intelligence, in dogs or humans, is multifaceted. Border collie's are very easy trainable, but that is not the only definition of intelligence.

Are you more likely to run away if you see a loose pitbull running down the street or a loose border collie running down the street?

 

[Jarhyn]

WTF are you babbling about?
That is total bs. Intelligence, in dogs or humans, is multifaceted. Border collie's are very easy trainable, but that is not the only definition of intelligence.

Are you more likely to run away if you see a loose pitbull running down the street or a loose border collie running down the street?

Neither. When faced with the possibility of an aggressive dog, you make yourself look as large as possible, and possibly run at them, unless they are foaming at the mouth like a white supremecist...