Tigers!
Contributor
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2005
- Messages
- 5,917
- Location
- On the wing, waiting for a kick.
- Basic Beliefs
- Bible believing revelational redemptionist (Baptist)
There isn't a single obvious way of implementing proportionality. Some countries use high thresholds to keep out smaller parties; some are split to several smaller districts which cause implicit hidden thresholds. There are also different ways of counting the votes, d'Hondt method slightly favors larger parties whereas Sainte-Lague gives an edge to smaller ones. The point being, that there aren't necessarily a large number of small parties ruining the show.And it gives disproportionate power to the small parties. I'm not at all sure it's better.
Personally, I think it's healthy to have some small parties, because competition is good.
Look up the Hare-Clark system for an obtuse way to apportion seats.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hare%E2%80%93Clark_electoral_system#:~:text=Hare%2DClark%20is%20a%20type,as%20for%20the%20Australian%20Senate.