- Joined
- Oct 22, 2002
- Messages
- 39,913
- Location
- Frozen in Michigan
- Gender
- Old Fart
- Basic Beliefs
- Don't be a dick.
Oh good lord.I said:That is what is alleged. However, in your post you accused him of trying to break into the server, not assisting Manning in doing so. Guilt as an accomplice is still guilt, that much is true, but that's not what you wrote.Assange gave Manning instructions on how to break into the server. That makes him just as guilty as Manning.It is your position that Assange himself, not Manning, was the one trying to break into a top secret server? Assange himself was collecting the data he was reporting? Even the U.S. Government didn't go that far in what they were trying to charge him with before the plea bargain. They accused him of conspiracy to assist Manning, but not of being the one doing the hacking. They accused him of espionage for daring to publish data embarrassing to the U.S., which is of course a huge crime. One must not offend the image of the monarch.Woodward and Bernstein tried to break into a top secret server??? Perhaps we should alert the media?
So I'm confused as to where you got the idea I said something differant.Specifically he helped Chelsea Manning attempt to break into a secure server containing classified materials.
Oh, you forgot about this post.
Woodward and Bernstein tried to break into a top secret server??? Perhaps we should alert the media?He plead guilty to a bullshit charge. If Woodward and Bernstein had been held to the same standard as Assange, Nixon would have finished his second term in peace.
By implication you are saying Manning did try to break into ... whatever, you aren't bothered by your own double standards, why should I be bothered by your double standards. He hurt your patron saint, he embarrassed the holy government. The sinner must be destroyed.
Of course he tried to break into the server.