lpetrich
Contributor
Kyrsten Sinema’s Self-Defeating, Nonsensical Defense of the Filibuster | The New Republic - "The Arizona senator is almost single-handedly keeping Democrats from wielding their majority power—and the party may well lose that power as a result."
noting
Sarah Dohl on Twitter: ".@SenatorSinema is doubling down on her support of the #filibuster in emails to constituents today. (pic link)" / Twitter
noting
Sarah Dohl on Twitter: ".@SenatorSinema is doubling down on her support of the #filibuster in emails to constituents today. (pic link)" / Twitter
But in practice, it has turned the Senate into a Polish parliament, ineffective for the same reason.I have long said that I oppose eliminating the filibuster for votes on legislation. Retaining the legislative filibuster is not meant to impede the things we want to get done. Rather, it's meant to protect what the Senate was designed to be. I believe the Senate has a responsibility to put politics aside and fully consider, debate, and reach compromise on legislative issues that will affect all Americans. Therefore, I support the 60-vote threshold for all Senate actions. Debate on bills should be a bipartisan process that takes into account the views of all Americans, not just those of one political party.
Regardless of the party in control of the Senate, respecting the opinions of senators from the minority party will result in better, commonsense legislation. My position remains exactly the same now that I serve in the majority. While eliminating the filibuster may result in some short-term legislative gains, would deepen partisan divisions and sacrifice the long-term health of our government. I will continue working across the aisle with my colleagues in the United States Senate to ensure legislative process upholds the integrity of our democracy.