• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Legal prostitution, a surprise benefit

I would only be breaking an unjust law and would be no less innocent than a gay (or even straight, in some states) person engaging in "sodomy" pre-Lawrence.

Just like those "thugs" you think should be shot and killed on sight because they once got arrested for having pot in their possession.
Where did I ever say that somebody should be "killed on sight" just for having had a possession arrest?

Again, I am as innocent as people engaging in illegal sodomy pre-Lawrence. Technically illegal, but it is an unjust law.

If you don't like that fact, you should not try to denigrate other people for "breaking an unjust law"
Laws against assault, robbery or carjacking etc. are not unjust by any stretch of the imagination. Unlike laws against consensual sex work.
Again, your OPINION of what is an unjust law has no bearing on anything - especially when you have a history of selectively applying it.

You trot out alleged pot use as your evidence of criminality all the time when a white person or police officer shoots a black person.
Actually I used pot use as evidence of impairment.
No you don't. For fuck's sake, you used a baggy with residue from weeks/months earlier as part of your 'evidence' of a teenaged victim being a "thug" who deserved to be killed

And note that this version is very, very different from your original claim. Are you retracting it?
Not in the slightest.

I am, however, ending this exchange here because I've made my point and it is a derail.
 
In the process they accidentally legalized what went on behind closed doors and nobody realized it until a lawyer was boning up on the law an realized what it really said.

Was that intentional or was the lawyer just happy to see it? :hysterical:

Completely unintentional.

Typical conservative. No sense of humor.

I certainly would have used it had I thought of it but that was purely an accident.
 
Back
Top Bottom