RavenSky
The Doctor's Wife
I would only be breaking an unjust law and would be no less innocent than a gay (or even straight, in some states) person engaging in "sodomy" pre-Lawrence.
Where did I ever say that somebody should be "killed on sight" just for having had a possession arrest?Just like those "thugs" you think should be shot and killed on sight because they once got arrested for having pot in their possession.
Again, your OPINION of what is an unjust law has no bearing on anything - especially when you have a history of selectively applying it.Again, I am as innocent as people engaging in illegal sodomy pre-Lawrence. Technically illegal, but it is an unjust law.
Laws against assault, robbery or carjacking etc. are not unjust by any stretch of the imagination. Unlike laws against consensual sex work.If you don't like that fact, you should not try to denigrate other people for "breaking an unjust law"
No you don't. For fuck's sake, you used a baggy with residue from weeks/months earlier as part of your 'evidence' of a teenaged victim being a "thug" who deserved to be killedActually I used pot use as evidence of impairment.You trot out alleged pot use as your evidence of criminality all the time when a white person or police officer shoots a black person.
Not in the slightest.And note that this version is very, very different from your original claim. Are you retracting it?
I am, however, ending this exchange here because I've made my point and it is a derail.