March for women. A message from Conservatives

[LordKiran]

View attachment 9692

This is all at once sinister and goofy looking. Impressive.

 

[Derec]

And convicted kidnapper and murderer Donna Hylton.

She only kidnapped, tortured and murdered a man. White man at that. So she is acceptable to the Women's March powers that be. I'm surprised they didn't bring Mary Winkler and Lorena Bobbit as speakers too.

 

[Arctish]

I've been reading up on Donna Hylton. This article sums up how I feel about her being a featured speaker at the march:

Why Hylton? Was there no other person with her experiences who could stand in front of a sea of pink hats to inspire the crowd? No other woman? No other black woman?
Matt’s purpose was not to be an apologist for Hylton’s horrific crime, nor to extol her virtue as an inspirational speaker. He challenged the knee-jerk, simplistic reaction that her very availability and desire to speak to women’s issues and prison reform was an affront to the righteous folks who demand her execution.
Like Matt, I would have defended Hylton in court, fought the death penalty had it been a possibility (it wasn’t), and fought for her release after she completed her sentence. That some feel Hylton should never have been released, should have been executed, doesn’t concern me. They are allowed to be outraged. What she did was outrage-worthy, and while reasonable minds may differ as to whether she deserved to be released, the decision has been made. They can disagree with it all they want.
But to put her on the podium at the Women’s March as a person to whom others should look for inspiration? That’s a different matter.

 

[whichphilosophy]

And convicted kidnapper and murderer Donna Hylton.

She only kidnapped, tortured and murdered a man. White man at that. So she is acceptable to the Women's March powers that be. I'm surprised they didn't bring Mary Winkler and Lorena Bobbit as speakers too.

The support is largely vocal fringe groups. Mainstream Democrats protest by going to work and seeing how they can win the next election.
This plus Madonna's asinine speech about blowing up the Whitehouse tend to cause things like this to backfire.
The other concern is the Democrats, a great party could be veering to the Left. The Labour party experienced this before Blair took over

Violence and rioting are stemming mainly from Anarchists (who paint the A sign on their cars).
In the UK the Workers Revolutionary Party (Marxist) and others are actively endorsing the marches. What has the English Prostitutes Collectives (a backer of the UK marches) got to do with the price of peas. Nothing of course

 

[whichphilosophy]

View attachment 9692

This is all at once sinister and goofy looking. Impressive.

It's a resistance to a democratic electoral process.
Before he was in Politics Trump was recorded talking about grabbing a P****Y. This equate to why they wear the pink hats.
Clinton did it in the Whitehouse but this is regarded by the sheepulated as not as bad.

Both were bad but we should move on.

 

[Angry Floof]

This is all at once sinister and goofy looking. Impressive.

It's a resistance to a democratic electoral process.

This is false. No matter how many times people correct you, you just insist on this held down seven, don't you?

Before he was in Politics Trump was recorded talking about grabbing a P****Y. This equate to why they wear the pink hats.
Clinton did it in the Whitehouse but this is regarded by the sheepulated as not as bad.

You just keep making stuff up.

Both were bad but we should move on.

It's almost like you've been trained to keep throwing the same monkey poop over and over for all eternity.

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

The pussygrabbing line was a comment by Trump on class disparity, but feminism trumps class disparity so we won't be seeing this used to combat class disparity.

 

[Arctish]

The pussygrabbing line was a comment by Trump on class disparity, but feminism trumps class disparity so we won't be seeing this used to combat class disparity.

The pussygrabbing line was a comment by Trump on how he grabs women by the crotch and/or kisses them without waiting for consent and gets away with it because he's rich and famous. It was made in the context of this conversation about his interactions with women.

 

[thebeave]

The pussygrabbing line was a comment by Trump on class disparity, but feminism trumps class disparity so we won't be seeing this used to combat class disparity.

The pussygrabbing line was a comment by Trump on how he grabs women by the crotch and/or kisses them without waiting for consent and gets away with it because he's rich and famous. It was made in the context of this conversation about his interactions with women.

TBH, I've never really gotten consent from a woman that I kissed, nor has any woman ever asked for my consent when she kissed me that I can recall. Many times it was just out of the blue and unexpected. Honestly, I think if I ever asked a woman if it was OK if I kissed her, she'd probably get pretty turned off and go have a laugh with her friends about it. Same thing with the pussy, though I don't think I ever really "grabbed" one, like I was picking up a six pack of beer. Touched is probably a more accurate word.

 

[TSwizzle]

The pussygrabbing line was a comment by Trump on class disparity, but feminism trumps class disparity so we won't be seeing this used to combat class disparity.

Indeed. Trump was trying to big himself up in front of Billy Bush. Which is sad in itself.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

View attachment 9692

This is all at once sinister and goofy looking. Impressive.

What's sinister about it?

It looks like what it's designed to look like: cat ears. Devil horns aren't so wide.

 

[whichphilosophy]

It's a resistance to a democratic electoral process.

This is false. No matter how many times people correct you, you just insist on this held down seven, don't you?

Before he was in Politics Trump was recorded talking about grabbing a P****Y. This equate to why they wear the pink hats.
Clinton did it in the Whitehouse but this is regarded by the sheepulated as not as bad.

You just keep making stuff up.

Both were bad but we should move on.

It's almost like you've been trained to keep throwing the same monkey poop over and over for all eternity.

We have a much worse electorate process in the UK. The Tories won an outright majority on just over 36% We also are pursuing electoral reforms. In particular this is for proportional representation.

Bill put it in her mouth while he was in office and Donald talked about it 2005 before he was in office. Both were bad conduct. It's done it's over so I don't see the problem; 'much ado about nothing.'

 

[rousseau]

The pussygrabbing line was a comment by Trump on how he grabs women by the crotch and/or kisses them without waiting for consent and gets away with it because he's rich and famous. It was made in the context of this conversation about his interactions with women.

TBH, I've never really gotten consent from a woman that I kissed, nor has any woman ever asked for my consent when she kissed me that I can recall. Many times it was just out of the blue and unexpected. Honestly, I think if I ever asked a woman if it was OK if I kissed her, she'd probably get pretty turned off and go have a laugh with her friends about it. Same thing with the pussy, though I don't think I ever really "grabbed" one, like I was picking up a six pack of beer. Touched is probably a more accurate word.

The difference here is context. Touching your partner's vagina, vs touching a strangers are two different things. If you're touching your partner's the consent is more likely to be implied, if you're touching someone you don't know there's no consent and it's sexual assault.

Getting consent doesn't necessarily mean having a person explicitly say "I consent", it's earning the trust of the person so you know the consent is implied. If you kiss and grab people without that trust, you're probably a shitty person.

 

[whichphilosophy]

TBH, I've never really gotten consent from a woman that I kissed, nor has any woman ever asked for my consent when she kissed me that I can recall. Many times it was just out of the blue and unexpected. Honestly, I think if I ever asked a woman if it was OK if I kissed her, she'd probably get pretty turned off and go have a laugh with her friends about it. Same thing with the pussy, though I don't think I ever really "grabbed" one, like I was picking up a six pack of beer. Touched is probably a more accurate word.

The difference here is context. Touching your partner's vagina, vs touching a strangers are two different things. If you're touching your partner's the consent is more likely to be implied, if you're touching someone you don't know there's no consent and it's sexual assault.

Getting consent doesn't necessarily mean having a person explicitly say "I consent", it's earning the trust of the person so you know the consent is implied. If you kiss and grab people without that trust, you're probably a shitty person.

Talking about something that didn't even happen is abstract so there is nothing enforced or consensual.

 

[LordKiran]

This is all at once sinister and goofy looking. Impressive.

What's sinister about it?

It looks like what it's designed to look like: cat ears. Devil horns aren't so wide.

Mostly the shadow behind it and how it rises higher than the hat it's cast by. The image would have looked better if it was just the hat in the middle without the shadow.

 

[zorq]

The difference here is context. Touching your partner's vagina, vs touching a strangers are two different things. If you're touching your partner's the consent is more likely to be implied, if you're touching someone you don't know there's no consent and it's sexual assault.

Getting consent doesn't necessarily mean having a person explicitly say "I consent", it's earning the trust of the person so you know the consent is implied. If you kiss and grab people without that trust, you're probably a shitty person.

Talking about something that didn't even happen is abstract so there is nothing enforced or consensual.

What makes you think Don did not do what he claimed? There are several women who have accused him of various sexual miaconduct over the years.

His other brags about breaking into the changing rooms of Ms. Universe contestants to peep at unwilling naked women have been verified and are completely consistant with this one.

 

[Malintent]

Speaking of the women's march, one of the chief organizers is an Islamist who supports Sharia law and Hamas.

Organizer For DC Women’s March, Linda Sarsour Is Pro Sharia Law with Ties To Hamas

Indeed, Linda Sarsour supports a husband's right to beat his wife or rape her. What's the problem ?

Well, one problem is that the Trumpettes have been trumpeting on about how the support of the KKK for a trump presidency does not reflect badly upon him. so then either that is not true, or the support of an 'extremist' for Women's Rights does not reflect badly on that event or issues that massive number of people are raising.

Right?

 

[Trausti]

Indeed, Linda Sarsour supports a husband's right to beat his wife or rape her. What's the problem ?

Well, one problem is that the Trumpettes have been trumpeting on about how the support of the KKK for a trump presidency does not reflect badly upon him. so then either that is not true, or the support of an 'extremist' for Women's Rights does not reflect badly on that event or issues that massive number of people are raising.

Right?

Right. Recall all the cross burnings and white hoods at those Trump rallies?

 

[whichphilosophy]

Talking about something that didn't even happen is abstract so there is nothing enforced or consensual.

What makes you think Don did not do what he claimed? There are several women who have accused him of various sexual miaconduct over the years.

His other brags about breaking into the changing rooms of Ms. Universe contestants to peep at unwilling naked women have been verified and are completely consistant with this one.

Several people accused Bill Clinton of various things. They didn't come to much. I like to see the proof about any of these charges and not hearsay.

 

[whichphilosophy]

Well, one problem is that the Trumpettes have been trumpeting on about how the support of the KKK for a trump presidency does not reflect badly upon him. so then either that is not true, or the support of an 'extremist' for Women's Rights does not reflect badly on that event or issues that massive number of people are raising.

Right?

Right. Recall all the cross burnings and white hoods at those Trump rallies?

Feminists are against enforcing the Hijab. Femi-nazis are unpredictable. I don't yet know how extreme Linda Sasour is on Islam.