Look ... surely it goes without saying that Natural Selection is blind and has no prevision. For a mutation or trait to survive it must be fit for the environment it faces. I know this, you know this. So why the phuck pull me up on every sentence that isn't spelt out exactly.
Mate, you got nothing further to tell me. So you stay rooted in your philosophies, no problem at all. For you they're your lodestone, your rubber comforter, for me they are non-definitive platitudes and generalisations. But whatever suits your IQ as comprehensive and complete is fine by me.
We have
no more to discuss, nothing. So move on Dude, move on. There is no point in wasting your intelligence and valuable time in conversing with me, a monkey. And I don't need the grief of being purposefully misunderstood continually in order for you to feel that you have put down a potentially dangerous and heretical uprising, to justify your position, to save philosophy from fools and monkeys.
Turns out, I didn't need to wait for your second post to understand enough of you.
There, what could be better. You've said it, now stick to it, move on.
We are by nature stubbornly pledged to defend our own from attack, whether it be our person, our family, our property, or our opinion.
A history of philosophy and theology could be written in terms of grouches, wounded pride, and aversions, and it would be far more instructive than the usual treatments of these themes
I
don't want to discuss your personal problems with my views. You've had your say. OK? Find yourself another thread to Kant-Rant into. Do you get it pretty boy?
So bye bye, best kisses and wishes ... don't cry for me ...
