You are not making any rational comments about my position.
Do you seriously think repeating a lie makes it so?
You are attacking some strawman of your invention.
Everything I am "attacking" is based entirely on things you have written, so, once again, you are only fucking yourself.
The mind is something that arises from activity, is constructed by activity.
A) You can't know that. B) So all you've said here is that some form of brain activity is doing "something" to move the arm.
A) You can't know that. B) You have not--and cannot--establish what it is, nor that it is independent from the activity that generates it. C) Even if you could establish (and you can't) that it is "distinct" that does not in any way mean that it is independent. Again, a character in a film is distinct, but it does not exist independently of the projector.
The heat is not the heater or the activity of the heater.
The activity of a particular heater in a particular room causes the excitation of the particular air molecules in that room. This in turn causes a change in temperature in the room, which we call "Heat." Thus,
Heat is
the act of exciting air molecules.
The act of exciting air molecules ("heat") is entirely dependent upon the activity of the heater. Turn on the heater, and the activity of the heater excites the air molecules; turn off the heater and the lack of activity means the air molecules decrease their excitement.
There are exactly two categories here; the noun (heater) and the verb (to heat, or, the act of exciting air molecules). The verb is dependent upon the noun.
How can you possibly not comprehend this?