The phenomena of mind is produced. It is a product.
A) You can't know that. B) Equivocation. It is not a "product" in the sense of it being independent or the end result of process; i.e., separate or distinct from process, except in the most trivial, abstract sense.
Do you simply not know what animation is or how it works? Or how a film works? You won't find "Hamlet" on any of the film frames either, because in this context, "Hamlet" is an animated character. It requires twenty four frames per second passing through a light source for the illusion of the character of "Hamlet" to appear on a screen.
But it doesn't take a fucking mensa member to comprehend HOW the character is animated and HOW the character appears to come to life, but actually does not. It is the
act of projection that generates the illusion, but the illusion itself is not a "product" in the sense that it is an independent form/entity/thing, except in the abstract.
That's what you keep doing. You keep shifting the context, so that you go from verb to noun; from specific example to abstract condition. You can't do that. It gets you exactly nowhere.
In context, the particular character of Hamlet is the
act of projecting the film.
For all you know, that is precisely the case with the brain. Just as the letters on your screen are actually nothing more than 1's and 0's that tell a projector which pixels are "on" and which are "off." You can sift through those 1's and 0's individually and of course you won't find any words or letters. That's not how it works, so why are you constantly making those
category errors?
