ApostateAbe
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2002
- Messages
- 1,299
- Location
- Colorado, USA
- Basic Beliefs
- Infotheist. I believe the gods to be mere information.
Yeah, I think dogs bred to guard are bred to bite. If you think that means I obviously don't know anything about dogs, then that is where we part ways.What makes you think that herding and guarding required biting? You obviously don't know anything about dogs.It is mainly about dog breeds, and the taboo against racism is a related tangent. If it wasn't for the very common taboo against racism, then the perspective of the pit bull defenders would seem hair-brained to nearly everyone. I think it is rather easy to connect the dots. The pit-bull defenders seem to be caricatures of the anti-racists, as dogs are analogous to people, with about as much emotional investment, so defenders of pit bulls have applied the blank slate theory to dogs. But, let's make this about dogs, not people. What important variable do you think makes a Chow a thousand times more dangerous than a Greyhound? I think it is because Chows have the longest breeding history oriented toward herding and guarding, whereas Greyhounds were bred merely for game coursing and racing.
I think there are number of factors (assuming, of course, that your data is accurate). First, Chows are more likely to be around more people than Greyhounds. Lots of greyhounds are relatively isolated because they are racing dogs. And it may be that owners of Chows are less likely to understand their dogs and do not do a good job of training and handling their dogs compared to greyhound owners. It is true that Chows are generally more aggressive and territorial than greyhounds, but a good owner knows how to deal with his or her dog.If you don't agree with that, then what? Are owners of Chows the biggest dicks in the world but owners of Greyhounds the most gentle caring people in existence?