• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Mother Teresa’s charity sold babies: Indian police

phands

Veteran Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2013
Messages
1,976
Location
New York, Manhattan, Upper West Side
Basic Beliefs
Hardcore Atheist
It's been no secret that the disgusting old harpy was really an evil child-abusing hag, but now it's a legal matter. Her legacy lives on...

A nun and a staff member at Mother Teresa’s Missionaries of Charity in eastern India were arrested Thursday for allegedly selling babies born to unwed mothers, police said.


The pair were arrested from the grounds of one of the offices of the charity in Jharkhand on charges of child trafficking, police in the state capital Ranchi said.


The women could face up to five years in prison for selling a baby boy from the institution founded by the Nobel laureate, which cares for unwed pregnant women and mothers in distress.


Police said the infant was sold to a family in neighbouring Uttar Pradesh state for $1,700 by the two suspects.


They could face more charges as investigations widen into the illegal adoption scam, said Ranchi senior superintendent Aneesh Gupta.


“The women have admitted to four more such cases which we are in the process of verifying. The families which bought the babies are also under our radar and will face action,” he told AFP.

Source: RawStory
 
I read her book. You can try and denigrate someone dead from the actions of the few in the present.

She worked with some of the most abused, wretched, and disenfranchised people in India. Conditions that would make many of us puke.

She was no saint and had her detractors.
 
Selling human beings?
Disgusting!!!

Except when LGBTQ folks say it's OK
https://www.miraclesurrogacy.com/?g...yRs7yKy3aX6TyhK2J0fx20l9sFbH45JEaAhWoEALw_wcB

MIRACLE Surrogacy's surrogacy and IVF programs in Mexico are Legal, very affordable (less than $45,000)
Total Cost: $44,900 USD (everything included: egg donor, surrogate, baby delivery...everything!)

Wait, are you seriously equating surrogacy and slavery?

Do we need to explain to you the difference?

Or do you just not understand what a surrogate mother is?

We'd be more than happy to explain it to you.

- - - Updated - - -

I read her book. You can try and denigrate someone dead from the actions of the few in the present.

She worked with some of the most abused, wretched, and disenfranchised people in India. Conditions that would make many of us puke.

She was no saint and had her detractors.

She took people who were suffering horribly and deliberately made their suffering worse, in some cases consigning people to death who could have been saved, all because she thought suffering made people "more godly" or some shit.

And how can you possibly think that anything on your list justifies selling babies?
 
Wait, are you seriously equating surrogacy and slavery?

Do we need to explain to you the difference?

Or do you just not understand what a surrogate mother is?

We'd be more than happy to explain it to you.

- - - Updated - - -

I read her book. You can try and denigrate someone dead from the actions of the few in the present.

She worked with some of the most abused, wretched, and disenfranchised people in India. Conditions that would make many of us puke.

She was no saint and had her detractors.

She took people who were suffering horribly and deliberately made their suffering worse, in some cases consigning people to death who could have been saved, all because she thought suffering made people "more godly" or some shit.

And how can you possibly think that anything on your list justifies selling babies?

Her detractors claimed she only did charity to spread RCC. Not an unfair question. To claim she somehow set up a baby factory would require more proof than an isolated incident. Atheists are involved in huaman trafficking.

The OP refers to her as an old hag. Childish and ignorant, no better than the theists. Many in the RCC are motivated to service of mankind. The RCC charity does some good things. Theists are no different than atrheists in that some are good and some are bad.

I do not reject soley based on religion, and I do not accept soley based on lack of religion. To do otherwise would be irrational.
 
Hey...It sounds as though they were selling to prospective parents. Not just any old perverted priest who wanted his own fuckbuddy.
 
Wait, are you seriously equating surrogacy and slavery?

Do we need to explain to you the difference?

Or do you just not understand what a surrogate mother is?

We'd be more than happy to explain it to you.

- - - Updated - - -

I read her book. You can try and denigrate someone dead from the actions of the few in the present.

She worked with some of the most abused, wretched, and disenfranchised people in India. Conditions that would make many of us puke.

She was no saint and had her detractors.

She took people who were suffering horribly and deliberately made their suffering worse, in some cases consigning people to death who could have been saved, all because she thought suffering made people "more godly" or some shit.

And how can you possibly think that anything on your list justifies selling babies?

Her detractors claimed she only did charity to spread RCC. Not an unfair question. To claim she somehow set up a baby factory would require more proof than an isolated incident. Atheists are involved in huaman trafficking.

The OP refers to her as an old hag. Childish and ignorant, no better than the theists. Many in the RCC are motivated to service of mankind. The RCC charity does some good things. Theists are no different than atrheists in that some are good and some are bad.

I do not reject soley based on religion, and I do not accept soley based on lack of religion. To do otherwise would be irrational.

That is far from what her detractors are complaining about. Did you even read any of the complaints?

Since the various articles and books that were written are not something you want to read, here's a YouTube video:

 
Wait, are you seriously equating surrogacy and slavery?

Do we need to explain to you the difference?

Or do you just not understand what a surrogate mother is?

We'd be more than happy to explain it to you.

Yes
No
No
Not necessary.

Who is "we"? Are you impersonating Queen Victoria?
 
She was no saint

I thought the RCC had made her one.

Though I do agree that this present accusation of members of her organization can't be fairly laid at her door, being dead and all, still she was in life a disgusting old harpy, who abused children, the aged, the sick, and the dying.
 
Back
Top Bottom