You constantly ask these intrusive meaningless questions because you have no real positions, just belligerent submission to the current immorality.
My position is that workers could always manage themselves, much of what is called management is simply maintenance of the top down structure, which takes constant management.
But when you eliminate the top down structure you eliminate the need for this kind of management.
Negative.
Smart workers can manage themselves. As you work on down the food chain, people increasingly need to be managed, more accurately, supervised.
I have fifteen years management experience in the navy managing everything from the dumbest marine to the smartest enlisted sailors. The smart ones will recognize a good thing when they see it and work toward managing themselves (keep the supervisor out of their hair). The dumb ones will see the lack of supervision as opportunity to fuck off. This is based on fifteen years of observation. I was in the unique position of being a supervisor of Gunnersmates and Firecontrolmen. The navy liked to group these two job categories into the same division for obvious and ultimately comical reasons. These are some of the dumbest and smartest enlisted people in the navy.
I can tell within a work week what level of supervision a person will require. The wildcards of course are the emotionally unstable which can be found throughout the spectrum.
But you know, all these people were paid a living wage. And a smart pay grade E4 Firecontrolman earned the same as the dumbass E4 Gunnersmate. The Gunnersmate just made his job harder by being irresponsible. And we all got the same healthcare. And it all worked. Imagine.
