• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Palestinian viciously attacks a Jew in NYC, released on $10k bail

Pretty much anyone who doesn't suck Israeli ass, is dirty and responsible for anything bad happening to Jews anywhere...in Derec World.


For the record, AOC has commented, but doubt its enough for Derec...

A dollar short and a day late. She initially blamed "white supremacy". And note that she is still holding fast to her attacks on Israel defending itself from Hamas aggression from Gaza.

_118517664_gettyimages-1232873479.jpg

Iron dome interceptors scrambling to intercept rockets fired on Israeli civilians by Hamas, which AOC refuses to condemn for their double war crime (firing rockets against civilians from civilian areas)
 
Given the local notoriety of this case, I wonder if Derec will push for a change in venue for the trial.
If you are referring to me saying that the George Floyd trials should be moved outside of Minneapolis metro area, that is hardly comparable. Minneapolis saw widespread and deadly rioting that lasted for months. #BLM insurrectionists have also occupied the area around Chicago and 38th and are in fact still occupying it. So it's in no way comparable, but thanks for another of your trademark non-sequiturs.
Apparently, your concern for a fair triall deoends on the profession of the killer.
Derec said:
That said, do you really think moving the trial outside of the Five Boroughs would help your guy? I think it would be exactly the opposite. He is much more likely to get serious prison time if tried in the burbs or upstate.
why would yiu think this murderous jackass is my guy?
I don’t think a change of venue is warranted .
 
Been charged, likely be found guilty of a bunch of stuff, presuming he doesn’t plea out.

Bail is BS as it lets people with money avoid incarceration. A person likely can be held without bail, but this crime might not raise to such a standard.

But I’m glad you were able to use the group attack of a person to get a The Gang rage boner going.

Bail needs to be used with caution--so often it has been used as a way to get people to plead guilty as the pre-trial wait is more punishment than the offense carries.

I'd like to see some sort of middle ground, though--bail is related to your previous offenses. Your previous record isn't too bad, the charge isn't too serious, you get released immediately. Note that this seems to work pretty well for traffic tickets--signing the ticket is a own-recognizance release.

You fail to show when you were supposed to and next time bail will be required. Likewise, another arrest while awaiting trial probably should have a bail requirement.
 
‘I would do it again’: Suspect accused of pummeling NYC Jewish man shows no remorse



$10k bail was a joke, and it was quickly raised by Waseem's pro-Hamas buddies.

WATCH: Freshly Released From Prison, Palestinian Thug Waseem Awawdeh Hailed As Hero



I am sure AOC, Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar were ecstatic as well! :rolleyes:

Put him in jail, throw away the key. Or next time, people will get killed.
Maybe have a trial first.

The state needs to go through the formalities but the guy openly confessed. There's no issue of guilt.
 
Maybe have a trial first.

The state needs to go through the formalities but the guy openly confessed. There's no issue of guilt.

No, there is ALWAYS an issue of guilt. One brief, clickbaity, one sided article isn't enough to convince me of anything.

Self defence? We don't know. False confession? we don't know. Coercion? We don't know. I'm not claiming innocence, but it is foolish to rush to judgement. Especially given how cherry picked and scant the evidence we have appears to be.
 
You could find a bazillion images of BoogerBois indoctrinating kids with assault rifles and still the image would not find purchase where it ought.
Why are you so obsessed with so-called "booger bois"?
In any case, things are a bit different when a leader of a "country" like Yahya Sinwar is posing with child terrorists. Not comparable with a kid doing target practice or something.
 
Apparently, your concern for a fair triall deoends on the profession of the killer.
It's about circumstances of the case. Again, the George Floyd case resulted in months of deadly rioting, billions in property damage and an ongoing occupation of a city block.

why would yiu think this murderous jackass is my guy?
This is luckily an (aggravated) assault case, not a murder case.
But it just goes to show how little attention you pay.
I don’t think a change of venue is warranted .
So why did you bring it up? Just to argue?
 
Since he is being charged with a hate crime, this is yet another incorrect assumption on your part.
Democratic Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance is considered way too right for the woke wing of the Democratic Party. Most of the candiates vying to replace him in the upcoming election are significantly to his Left. Especially that Palestinian chick who is still upset that her crook father had to serve time in federal prison. If she was DA I very much doubt she'd be seeking hate crime charges.

Considering your track record, no one should have any confidence in what you assume regarding NYC prosecutors or judges.
What track record is that? Be specific.

For the record, AOC has commented, but doubt its enough for Derec...
Eventually. I am still not impressed by her statement.

AOC said:
There is no room for anti-semitism in the movement for Palestinian liberation. Our critique is of Israel and their human rights abuses. This is not an excuse for anti-semitic hate crimes

She is still on about so-called "Palestinian liberation" which is usually a code-word for destroying Israel to establish so-called Palestine "from the river to the sea". She is also accusing Israel of "human rights abuses" but she completely ignores many orders of magnitude more egregious Palestinian human rights abuses, especially those by Hamas in Gaza, both against Israeli civilians and their own population.

Not only can I now say that you were 100% wrong about AOC, I can also say funinspace was 100% correct about you. Not that either of those things were really in dispute before he posted.

I disagree about all of it. A lukewarm statement against antiseminitism is more than undone by her continued unwarranted attacks against Israel while completely ignoring all the atrocities committed by Hamas and other Palestinian terror groups.
 
Someone's upset with obsession. Ironic.

Are you insinuating that I am obsessed with AOC/squad? You are confusing me with lpetrich, who started (and wrote a large plurality of the posts in) a 497 (and counting) megathread all about AOC.
 
Especially given how cherry picked and scant the evidence we have appears to be.

The evidence is actually overwhelming. But the perp is not a "booger boi" so you don't want him to be guilty.

Lol.

I think you are projecting.

This is a free thought board not a judge everything as it looks on the surface board.

Things aren't always what they appear to be at first glance. Sometimes truth is stranger than fiction and doesn't conform to a black and white dichotomy. Recognizing these facts is a strength.
 
It's about circumstances of the case. Again, the George Floyd case resulted in months of deadly rioting, billions in property damage and an ongoing occupation of a city block.
So? You had a concern about a white police officer killing a black man getting a fair trial based on the video of the killing going viral and your projection of fear on the part of the jurors. I simply wondered if you might have a concern about a non-police officer whose violent assault has been splashed on the front pages, the news and the internet getting a fair trial.

This is luckily an (aggravated) assault case, not a murder case.
But it just goes to show how little attention you pay.
You really should expand your vocabulary. "Murderous" means extremely violent or capable of intending murder.
Derec said:
So why did you bring it up? Just to argue?
I think you can figure it out if you try.
 
Democratic Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance is considered way too right for the woke wing of the Democratic Party. Most of the candiates vying to replace him in the upcoming election are significantly to his Left. Especially that Palestinian chick who is still upset that her crook father had to serve time in federal prison. If she was DA I very much doubt she'd be seeking hate crime charges.

We are not talking about what you imagine amidst your fevered dreams, we are talking about a thing that actually happened. He is being charged with a hate crime, which counters your narrative that somehow the law is going easy on him because he is a Muslim. All you are proving here is that you do not care about reality, you are either pushing an agenda, or have been taken in by someone who is.

What track record is that? Be specific.
1. You incorrectly assumed AOC would be ecstatic when her only public comments shown in this thread show that she condemned the assault:
I am sure AOC, Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar were ecstatic as well! :rolleyes:

2. You incorrectly assumed that this post was a justification when it was not presented as such, and the poster has told you that it was not a justification:
Decades of Israeli brutality and oppression have had many effects.
Usually that kind of stuff does not lead to peace.

Is there anything Palestinians do that you will not try to justify?

3. You incorrectly assumed that he would be favored over a "white supremacist" in this case because he is Muslim, when he has actually been charged with a hate crime just like a "white supremacist" should have been:
If anything, him being Muslim works in his favor, since the Left is committed to pretending that antisemitism is a "white supremacy" problem.

And, of course, if you fail to prove your doubling down on #1 by claiming AOC first blamed this attack on "white supremacy", that will be added to the tally. Who knows, you might actually back up that statement and get one assumption right. That would still leave you with a less than stellar track record with regard to the things you assume.

For the record, AOC has commented, but doubt its enough for Derec...
Eventually. I am still not impressed by her statement.

Exactly. You are showing that funinspace was 100% correct. Even AOC saying the exact things you assumed she would not say are not enough to convince you that the assumption that she would hold the opposite position is wrong.

AOC said:
There is no room for anti-semitism in the movement for Palestinian liberation. Our critique is of Israel and their human rights abuses. This is not an excuse for anti-semitic hate crimes

She is still on about so-called "Palestinian liberation" which is usually a code-word for destroying Israel to establish so-called Palestine "from the river to the sea".

Yet another assumption of yours that I can safely discount.

She is also accusing Israel of "human rights abuses" but she completely ignores many orders of magnitude more egregious Palestinian human rights abuses, especially those by Hamas in Gaza, both against Israeli civilians and their own population.

Kind of like the way you completely ignore US law enforcement abuses against unarmed blacks that are many orders of magnitude more egregious than this assault on a civilian by a civilian? Why do you expect everyone else to condemn everything that is bad in the world, when you fail to do so yourself?

Not only can I now say that you were 100% wrong about AOC, I can also say funinspace was 100% correct about you. Not that either of those things were really in dispute before he posted.

I disagree about all of it. A lukewarm statement against antiseminitism is more than undone by her continued unwarranted attacks against Israel while completely ignoring all the atrocities committed by Hamas and other Palestinian terror groups.

Of course you disagree with it. You made a slew of invalid assumptions in this thread, and that is common in threads in which you participate. You show no awareness of your prejudices, and as a result you allow them to drive you to post incorrect assumptions quite often.
 
Back
Top Bottom