• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Pelosi: Impeachment Is Moving Forward

And we got this today.
Alan Dershowitz said:
Every public official that I know believes that his election is in the public interest. And mostly you’re right — your election is in the public interest. And if a president did something that he believes will help him get elected, in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment.
:eek:

Dershowitz became the youngest professor in Harvad's history at age 28. Why Harvard would have this guy teach law when some people on an internet forum think he's dumb is beyond me. Why would Harvard hire such a quack? Guess all the current lawyers who had him as teacher learned nothing from the guy, right? All you guys know better than him.

There's an old, old saying: Those who can't do, teach.

BTW, who said he's dumb? Give me names.
 
Dershowitz became the youngest professor in Harvad's history at age 28. Why Harvard would have this guy teach law when some people on an internet forum think he's dumb is beyond me. Why would Harvard hire such a quack? Guess all the current lawyers who had him as teacher learned nothing from the guy, right? All you guys know better than him.

Now who's throwing up an argument from authority? I thought those made you laugh?

So, Harvard hired a quack at age 28 and never realized how big of a quack the guy was? Weird.
 
Dershowitz became the youngest professor in Harvad's history at age 28. Why Harvard would have this guy teach law when some people on an internet forum think he's dumb is beyond me. Why would Harvard hire such a quack? Guess all the current lawyers who had him as teacher learned nothing from the guy, right? All you guys know better than him.

There's an old, old saying: Those who can't do, teach.

BTW, who said he's dumb? Give me names.

That's very offensive to teachers. I thought you guys were behind teachers? Do you tell your kids to go to school and yell at their teacher, YOU CAN'T DO ANYTHING SO YOU HAVE TO TEACH!!!"
 
Dershowitz became the youngest professor in Harvad's history at age 28. Why Harvard would have this guy teach law when some people on an internet forum think he's dumb is beyond me. Why would Harvard hire such a quack? Guess all the current lawyers who had him as teacher learned nothing from the guy, right? All you guys know better than him.

Now who's throwing up an argument from authority? I thought those made you laugh?

So, Harvard hired a quack at age 28 and never realized how big of a quack the guy was? Weird.

Repeating your argument doesn't improve its quality.
 
Trump withheld the money AFTER the deadline?

Campaign finance. He broke the law. Can you keep up?

But if Biden is going to be the Democratic nomination, the American people have a right to know if Biden was being corrupt. This would majorly help the public have a more informed opinion on Biden. By saying, "Trump can't do that!," you guys are essentially saying that the American people are better off voting for Biden without knowing how corrupt the guy is. This sounds like election tampering to me: suppressing the full story about a candidate can result in millions of votes based on false pretenses.
nope. We're saying trump should be prosecuted for his crimes, that's all.
 
Dershowitz became the youngest professor in Harvad's history at age 28. Why Harvard would have this guy teach law when some people on an internet forum think he's dumb is beyond me. Why would Harvard hire such a quack? Guess all the current lawyers who had him as teacher learned nothing from the guy, right? All you guys know better than him.

There's an old, old saying: Those who can't do, teach.

BTW, who said he's dumb? Give me names.

That's very offensive to teachers. I thought you guys were behind teachers? Do you tell your kids to go to school and yell at their teacher, YOU CAN'T DO ANYTHING SO YOU HAVE TO TEACH!!!"

My wife and I are childless against our will. You assuming I have kids is very offensive to the childless. DO YOU TELL CHILDLESS WOMEN THEY ARE NOT REALLY WOMEN?
 
Dershowitz became the youngest professor in Harvad's history at age 28. Why Harvard would have this guy teach law when some people on an internet forum think he's dumb is beyond me. Why would Harvard hire such a quack? Guess all the current lawyers who had him as teacher learned nothing from the guy, right? All you guys know better than him.

Now who's throwing up an argument from authority? I thought those made you laugh?

So, Harvard hired a quack at age 28 and never realized how big of a quack the guy was? Weird.
that's still argument ftom authority, fella.

No one said he is a quack. His argument sucks, but when a lawyer's client is so guilty, he hasn't got a lot of legs to stand on.
 
Dershowitz became the youngest professor in Harvad's history at age 28. Why Harvard would have this guy teach law when some people on an internet forum think he's dumb is beyond me. Why would Harvard hire such a quack? Guess all the current lawyers who had him as teacher learned nothing from the guy, right? All you guys know better than him.

There's an old, old saying: Those who can't do, teach.

BTW, who said he's dumb? Give me names.

That's very offensive to teachers.
it's a saying. This is exactly like you referring to any time 'all us conservatives laugh at...' yourhypocrisy is in full swing today, innit?
I thought you guys were behind teachers? Do you tell your kids to go to school and yell at their teacher, YOU CAN'T DO ANYTHING SO YOU HAVE TO TEACH!!!"

Dipwad, i am a teacher and so is my wife, and i have used the phrase. You're just flailing, now.
 
But if Biden is going to be the Democratic nomination, the American people have a right to know if Biden was being corrupt. This would majorly help the public have a more informed opinion on Biden. By saying, "Trump can't do that!," you guys are essentially saying that the American people are better off voting for Biden without knowing how corrupt the guy is. This sounds like election tampering to me: suppressing the full story about a candidate can result in millions of votes based on false pretenses.
nope. We're saying trump should be prosecuted for his crimes, that's all.

I'm watching Fox News now and they said, "Remember when Obama said 'I don't need Congress. I have a pen and a phone."

Turns out it's a real quote. I just looked it up. Yet, no Dems were screaming at Obama to stop that. They let him subvert democracy.

They also just said, "Wages are up for blacks and hispanics under Trump. The Dems are mad Trump got this done because the Dems have been promising to do this for years and they couldn't get it done! So, of course they attack Trump."

Just shows how partisan they have become. If they really cared about the blacks and hispanics, they would be praising Trump for doing this to their wages. This is sickening stuff.
 
An interesting answer to a rather uncomplicated question.

article said:
The President’s deputy counsel told the Senate today that he didn’t “know off the top of his head” when the legal team learned that the manuscript for former national security adviser John Bolton’s forthcoming book had been submitted to the National Security Council.

At some point, I don't know off the top of my head the exact date,” Patrick Philbin said in response to a question asking when the team was notified and if they had done anything to block the book’s release.
What a peculiar response. They weren't asked when the NSC received. They were asked when they were told it existed. And this wasn't some individual email or Parnas video... this is a manuscript that has acted as a pair of concrete boots to their attempt to make this stuff disappear. Yet, he can't recall when they learned it existed?
 
But if Biden is going to be the Democratic nomination, the American people have a right to know if Biden was being corrupt. This would majorly help the public have a more informed opinion on Biden. By saying, "Trump can't do that!," you guys are essentially saying that the American people are better off voting for Biden without knowing how corrupt the guy is. This sounds like election tampering to me: suppressing the full story about a candidate can result in millions of votes based on false pretenses.
nope. We're saying trump should be prosecuted for his crimes, that's all.

I'm watching Fox News now and they said, "Remember when Obama said 'I don't need Congress. I have a pen and a phone."

Turns out it's a real quote. I just looked it up. Yet, no Dems were screaming at Obama to stop that. They let him subvert democracy.

They also just said, "Wages are up for blacks and hispanics under Trump. The Dems are mad Trump got this done because the Dems have been promising to do this for years and they couldn't get it done! So, of course they attack Trump."

Just shows how partisan they have become. If they really cared about the blacks and hispanics, they would be praising Trump for doing this to their wages. This is sickening stuff.

There are many things presidents are allowed to do without congress. Trump does executive orders all the time as has every other president. What they can't do is commit crimes.

That you would find this a compelling argument without thinking it through is interesting. It confirms the thought that conservatives are simpletons.
 
They also just said, "Wages are up for blacks and hispanics under Trump. The Dems are mad Trump got this done because the Dems have been promising to do this for years and they couldn't get it done! So, of course they attack Trump."

Just shows how partisan they have become. If they really cared about the blacks and hispanics, they would be praising Trump for doing this to their wages. This is sickening stuff.

You fed the cat some yummy tuna so it's plainy okay for you to stomp the puppy to death.
 
They also just said, "Wages are up for blacks and hispanics under Trump. The Dems are mad Trump got this done because the Dems have been promising to do this for years and they couldn't get it done! So, of course they attack Trump."

Just shows how partisan they have become. If they really cared about the blacks and hispanics, they would be praising Trump for doing this to their wages. This is sickening stuff.

You fed the cat some yummy tuna so it's plainy okay for you to stomp the puppy to death.

What? Wages going up for blacks and hispanics is stomping them to death?

BTW, how do you think his "white supremacist" fan base (that you guys claim he caters to) enjoys wages going up for blacks and hispanics and enjoys his plan for Middle East peace?
 
Dershowitz became the youngest professor in Harvad's history at age 28.
So, this means he is inerrable?
All you guys know better than him.
Yes, he is wrong. His suggestion that a President can do anything to get re-elected, because it is in the "public interest" is ridiculous, at best.
 
They also just said, "Wages are up for blacks and hispanics under Trump. The Dems are mad Trump got this done because the Dems have been promising to do this for years and they couldn't get it done! So, of course they attack Trump."

Just shows how partisan they have become. If they really cared about the blacks and hispanics, they would be praising Trump for doing this to their wages. This is sickening stuff.

You fed the cat some yummy tuna so it's plainy okay for you to stomp the puppy to death.

What? Wages going up for blacks and hispanics is stomping them to death?

BTW, how do you think his "white supremacist" fan base (that you guys claim he caters to) enjoys wages going up for blacks and hispanics and enjoys his plan for Middle East peace?

You used it to excuse Trump criminal activity. And now you are deflecting again. Is it really that hard for you to not derail a thread? You do see the topic at the top of the page, don't you?
 
What? Wages going up for blacks and hispanics is stomping them to death?

BTW, how do you think his "white supremacist" fan base (that you guys claim he caters to) enjoys wages going up for blacks and hispanics and enjoys his plan for Middle East peace?

You used it to excuse Trump criminal activity. And now you are deflecting again. Is it really that hard for you to not derail a thread? You do see the topic at the top of the page, don't you?

I see it. But, sometimes conversation flows. One time I was talking to someone about Trump and then eventually we somehow got on the topic of football.
 
Dershowitz became the youngest professor in Harvad's history at age 28.
So, this means he is inerrable?
All you guys know better than him.
Yes, he is wrong. His suggestion that a President can do anything to get re-elected, because it is in the "public interest" is ridiculous, at best.

If it's in the interest of the American people, it should be allowed. As I said, if Biden is proven to be corrupt, that could hugely influence whether or not people want to vote for the guy. Suppressing his corruption is lying to the people and not allowing them to make an informed decision.

This is what Dersh was talking about.
 
What? Wages going up for blacks and hispanics is stomping them to death?

BTW, how do you think his "white supremacist" fan base (that you guys claim he caters to) enjoys wages going up for blacks and hispanics and enjoys his plan for Middle East peace?

You used it to excuse Trump criminal activity. And now you are deflecting again. Is it really that hard for you to not derail a thread? You do see the topic at the top of the page, don't you?

I see it. But, sometimes conversation flows. One time I was talking to someone about Trump and then eventually we somehow got on the topic of football.

Your "flow" seems to always turn into a torrent.
 
But if Biden is going to be the Democratic nomination, the American people have a right to know if Biden was being corrupt. This would majorly help the public have a more informed opinion on Biden. By saying, "Trump can't do that!," you guys are essentially saying that the American people are better off voting for Biden without knowing how corrupt the guy is. This sounds like election tampering to me: suppressing the full story about a candidate can result in millions of votes based on false pretenses.
nope. We're saying trump should be prosecuted for his crimes, that's all.

I'm watching Fox News now and they said, "Remember when Obama said 'I don't need Congress. I have a pen and a phone."
like, Bonespurs and his executive orders?
Turns out it's a real quote. I just looked it up. Yet, no Dems were screaming at Obama to stop that. They let him subvert democracy.
just like bonespurs and his executive orders?
They also just said, "Wages are up for blacks and hispanics under Trump. The Dems are mad Trump got this done because the Dems have been promising to do this for years and they couldn't get it done! So, of course they attack Trump."

Just shows how partisan they have become. If they really cared about the blacks and hispanics, they would be praising Trump for doing this to their wages. This is sickening stuff.
So, if the economy is good, he did not crime? Is that your thought?
 
So, this means he is inerrable?
Yes, he is wrong. His suggestion that a President can do anything to get re-elected, because it is in the "public interest" is ridiculous, at best.

If it's in the interest of the American people, it should be allowed.
if clinton felt that admitting to a blowjob was NOT in the public interest, then his lie should have been allowed?
 
Back
Top Bottom