Predict Trump's first revenge prosecutions!

[laughing dog]

He doesn't need to prosecute his enemies. All he needs to do is release the Epstein list and the Diddy list.

Completely unabridged? LOL.

 

[Elixir]

He doesn't need to prosecute his enemies. All he needs to do is release the Epstein list and the Diddy list.

Completely unabridged? LOL.

He probably knows that list by heart- likely sat next them all at one time or another.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

He doesn't need to prosecute his enemies. All he needs to do is release the Epstein list and the Diddy list.

Some of his people are going to be on that!

 

[ideologyhunter]

Trump said he would protect American women. The plan seems to be that Kash will attend the first cabinet meeting and arrest every other secretary in a major sting op. Promise made, promise kept.

 

[Jarhyn]

He doesn't need to prosecute his enemies. All he needs to do is release the Epstein list and the Diddy list.

Some of his people are going to be on that!

Nah, it's just half the list will be blacked out with a sharpie (that you can still kinda see the original text past).

 

[Patooka]

He doesn't need to prosecute his enemies. All he needs to do is release the Epstein list and the Diddy list.

Some of his people are going to be on that!

Nah, it's just half the list will be blacked out with a sharpie (that you can still kinda see the original text past).

The depressing part is that there is a non zero chance of that happening.

 

[ideologyhunter]

From tonight's news, he'll start fuming about the BCF (Biden Crime Family) all over again and never run out of ammo. I don't want to hear it. We're in for a bushel of faux Republican outrage (I'd call it FRO but that's not a good look for Repubs, ever.) How are Joe and Donald ever gonna share the same bleachers on Jan. 20??

 

[TV and credit cards]

WTF! I just read that the House has passed HR 9495, which gives Sec'y Treasury unilateral power to revoke the tax-exempt status of any entity he deems "terrorist." This change in status will effectively destroy many non-profits, including ACLU, NAACP, and news sources like ProPublica.

I guess those non-profits really should have avoided becoming terrorist organizations then.

Presumably, if the government believes they are terrorists they will also get charged and put in prison, yes?

That would require actual evidence. IIUC, HR 9495 allows revocation of status with nothing but Secy Treas's signature.

As defined by 18 U.S. Code § 2339B with final review by the district courts. See Sec 4 (F).
I suppose in the interim it is a tool for harassment.

 

[marc]

Will Trump try to go after Biden? And if so will he find that presidential immunity will prevent any kind of lawsuit (never mind that anything they accuse him of will be totally fictional)?

 

[Loren Pechtel]

WTF! I just read that the House has passed HR 9495, which gives Sec'y Treasury unilateral power to revoke the tax-exempt status of any entity he deems "terrorist." This change in status will effectively destroy many non-profits, including ACLU, NAACP, and news sources like ProPublica.

I guess those non-profits really should have avoided becoming terrorist organizations then.

Presumably, if the government believes they are terrorists they will also get charged and put in prison, yes?

That would require actual evidence. IIUC, HR 9495 allows revocation of status with nothing but Secy Treas's signature.

As defined by 18 U.S. Code § 2339B with final review by the district courts. See Sec 4 (F).
I suppose in the interim it is a tool for harassment.

Guilty until proven innocent.