laughing dog
Contributor
Completely unabridged? LOL.He doesn't need to prosecute his enemies. All he needs to do is release the Epstein list and the Diddy list.
Completely unabridged? LOL.He doesn't need to prosecute his enemies. All he needs to do is release the Epstein list and the Diddy list.
He probably knows that list by heart- likely sat next them all at one time or another.Completely unabridged? LOL.He doesn't need to prosecute his enemies. All he needs to do is release the Epstein list and the Diddy list.
Some of his people are going to be on that!He doesn't need to prosecute his enemies. All he needs to do is release the Epstein list and the Diddy list.
Nah, it's just half the list will be blacked out with a sharpie (that you can still kinda see the original text past).Some of his people are going to be on that!He doesn't need to prosecute his enemies. All he needs to do is release the Epstein list and the Diddy list.
The depressing part is that there is a non zero chance of that happening.Nah, it's just half the list will be blacked out with a sharpie (that you can still kinda see the original text past).Some of his people are going to be on that!He doesn't need to prosecute his enemies. All he needs to do is release the Epstein list and the Diddy list.
As defined by 18 U.S. Code § 2339B with final review by the district courts. See Sec 4 (F).I guess those non-profits really should have avoided becoming terrorist organizations then.WTF! I just read that the House has passed HR 9495, which gives Sec'y Treasury unilateral power to revoke the tax-exempt status of any entity he deems "terrorist." This change in status will effectively destroy many non-profits, including ACLU, NAACP, and news sources like ProPublica.
Presumably, if the government believes they are terrorists they will also get charged and put in prison, yes?
That would require actual evidence. IIUC, HR 9495 allows revocation of status with nothing but Secy Treas's signature.
Guilty until proven innocent.As defined by 18 U.S. Code § 2339B with final review by the district courts. See Sec 4 (F).I guess those non-profits really should have avoided becoming terrorist organizations then.WTF! I just read that the House has passed HR 9495, which gives Sec'y Treasury unilateral power to revoke the tax-exempt status of any entity he deems "terrorist." This change in status will effectively destroy many non-profits, including ACLU, NAACP, and news sources like ProPublica.
Presumably, if the government believes they are terrorists they will also get charged and put in prison, yes?
That would require actual evidence. IIUC, HR 9495 allows revocation of status with nothing but Secy Treas's signature.
I suppose in the interim it is a tool for harassment.
Republicans are more, "give us a name and we'll find the crime". Guilty and innocence mean fuck all to these cunts.Guilty until proven innocent.As defined by 18 U.S. Code § 2339B with final review by the district courts. See Sec 4 (F).I guess those non-profits really should have avoided becoming terrorist organizations then.WTF! I just read that the House has passed HR 9495, which gives Sec'y Treasury unilateral power to revoke the tax-exempt status of any entity he deems "terrorist." This change in status will effectively destroy many non-profits, including ACLU, NAACP, and news sources like ProPublica.
Presumably, if the government believes they are terrorists they will also get charged and put in prison, yes?
That would require actual evidence. IIUC, HR 9495 allows revocation of status with nothing but Secy Treas's signature.
I suppose in the interim it is a tool for harassment.
Yep. I don't know that I'd call it encouraging, but the recognition of the serious potential end of due process by liberals here is so much more in touch with reality than younger libs and liberal podcasts.Republicans are more, "give us a name and we'll find the crime". Guilty and innocence mean fuck all to these cunts.Guilty until proven innocent.As defined by 18 U.S. Code § 2339B with final review by the district courts. See Sec 4 (F).I guess those non-profits really should have avoided becoming terrorist organizations then.WTF! I just read that the House has passed HR 9495, which gives Sec'y Treasury unilateral power to revoke the tax-exempt status of any entity he deems "terrorist." This change in status will effectively destroy many non-profits, including ACLU, NAACP, and news sources like ProPublica.
Presumably, if the government believes they are terrorists they will also get charged and put in prison, yes?
That would require actual evidence. IIUC, HR 9495 allows revocation of status with nothing but Secy Treas's signature.
I suppose in the interim it is a tool for harassment.
To not be able to vote again would be too much of a shock. Hell, even Russians get to vote. Between creative law writing and befuddling court decisions, the Republicans will boil the frog.Yep. I don't know that I'd call it encouraging, but the recognition of the serious potential end of due process by liberals here is so much more in touch with reality than younger libs and liberal podcasts.Republicans are more, "give us a name and we'll find the crime". Guilty and innocence mean fuck all to these cunts.Guilty until proven innocent.As defined by 18 U.S. Code § 2339B with final review by the district courts. See Sec 4 (F).I guess those non-profits really should have avoided becoming terrorist organizations then.WTF! I just read that the House has passed HR 9495, which gives Sec'y Treasury unilateral power to revoke the tax-exempt status of any entity he deems "terrorist." This change in status will effectively destroy many non-profits, including ACLU, NAACP, and news sources like ProPublica.
Presumably, if the government believes they are terrorists they will also get charged and put in prison, yes?
That would require actual evidence. IIUC, HR 9495 allows revocation of status with nothing but Secy Treas's signature.
I suppose in the interim it is a tool for harassment.
I've heard them say that Some Law is going to prevent Trump from doing X horrible thing, so everyone need not sweat it. Meanwhile, I honestly don't know if we're ever going to get to vote again while the lib-sphere thinks is going to be business as usual.
I hope the they're right, but to me it's just more evidence of the especially limp dickery that the Dems have displayed over the past 8+ years.
To not be able to vote again would be too much of a shock. Hell, even Russians get to vote. Between creative law writing and befuddling court decisions, the Republicans will boil the frog.
Maybe, but I see it as their opportunity to hold phony elections like Saddam Hussein used to do and what all dictatorships thinly posing as democracies do.To not be able to vote again would be too much of a shock. Hell, even Russians get to vote. Between creative law writing and befuddling court decisions, the Republicans will boil the frog.Yep. I don't know that I'd call it encouraging, but the recognition of the serious potential end of due process by liberals here is so much more in touch with reality than younger libs and liberal podcasts.Republicans are more, "give us a name and we'll find the crime". Guilty and innocence mean fuck all to these cunts.Guilty until proven innocent.As defined by 18 U.S. Code § 2339B with final review by the district courts. See Sec 4 (F).I guess those non-profits really should have avoided becoming terrorist organizations then.WTF! I just read that the House has passed HR 9495, which gives Sec'y Treasury unilateral power to revoke the tax-exempt status of any entity he deems "terrorist." This change in status will effectively destroy many non-profits, including ACLU, NAACP, and news sources like ProPublica.
Presumably, if the government believes they are terrorists they will also get charged and put in prison, yes?
That would require actual evidence. IIUC, HR 9495 allows revocation of status with nothing but Secy Treas's signature.
I suppose in the interim it is a tool for harassment.
I've heard them say that Some Law is going to prevent Trump from doing X horrible thing, so everyone need not sweat it. Meanwhile, I honestly don't know if we're ever going to get to vote again while the lib-sphere thinks is going to be business as usual.
I hope the they're right, but to me it's just more evidence of the especially limp dickery that the Dems have displayed over the past 8+ years.
Their eagerness to do that is already palpable. And already vocally endorsed by the maggots.I see it as their opportunity to hold phony elections
If they can perfect voter suppression then they can win in “legitimate” elections.Their eagerness to do that is already palpable. And already vocally endorsed by the maggots.I see it as their opportunity to hold phony elections
They might have to get violent about it for the first time or two, but people will settle in, like in Russia. They know better than to raise a fuss about it.If they can perfect voter suppression then they can win in “legitimate” elections.Their eagerness to do that is already palpable. And already vocally endorsed by the maggots.I see it as their opportunity to hold phony elections
They also won’t have to follow any laws.The Repubs won't have to break any laws to keep their winning edge.