Derec
Contributor
Whenever I read this, all I can hear you say is, “Let’s make it so that I can get what I want and then walk away without consequences.”
Or, “we really should be able to remove all of their leverage and refuse to negotiate. That’s the way we should do it.”
The bipartisan bill has been negotiated. And no, I do not agree with all the provisions, so it's not "what I want" really. But it is a decent bill. And it is a separate bill from the Dems only $3.5T spendapalooza. They should not be artificially shackled together.
Pelosi hasn't done a good thing. She is jeopardizing the bipartisan bill on infrastructure in order to push this extremely expensive non-infrastructure bill through. And no, not every government spending is "infrastructure" just because infrastructure is popular. Expanded child tax credit is not infrastructure under any definition except for the Newspeak pushed by the Democrats.Instead Pelosi seems to have done a good thing. The conservative Dems got something they wanted, a date, and the progressive Dems got something they wanted, commitment to consider human infrastructure as infrastructure.
Infrastructure has a meaning. It's not about liking things or not.There’s a weird and self-serving consevative definition that “infrastructure only means things I like, while things I don’t like, I will call something else so I can dismiss them without negotiation.”
I would argue that the economy needs available child care a lot more than it needs a bridge in order to keep going.
That still doesn't make spending such as child tax credits, free childcare or Medicare expansion "infrastructure". And I would argue people with children get subsidized enough, so giving them even more taxpayer dollars is not even good policy, in addition to not being infrastructure.