dystopian
NL is a tiny country with relativelyminor political issues
You are seriously mistaken to think we have "relatively minor political issues."; also, a population of 17 million does not qualify as tiny on the global stage. It has us fit into the 'middle' size rank.
and little of the social ills engendered bythe scope of the USA as single entitl y.
You are once again, mistaken.
European states tend to be smaller moreeasily managed by centralized control.
Except in many respects we're more decentralized than the US is. This has been true since our founding.
Id you look at the economicdemographics over here unemployment tends to be highest in blackpopulations, IMO a residue of slavery followed by Jim Crow.
So? Exactly which groups in the Netherlands do you think have the highest unemployment? Because it sure as fuck isn't white people.
LA alone is far more socially,economically, and politically complicated than NL.
This couldn't be more laughably wrong. First off, the idea that a country with a two party system could be more politically complicated than a country with dozens of viable political parties is simply absurd. Even more so when you add in the many complicated *layers* of politics that we have which the US doesn't. Secondly, Dutch cities are in fact more ethnically and culturally diverse than LA, by a considerable margin. Amsterdam has more nationalities living within its bounds than any other city in the world (177 in total). 51% of Amsterdam's population is foreign born, the majority of which are of non-western origins. These figures are not unusual for our cities.
Trying to compare NL with the USA onany level is IMO simple ignorance of American history and politics.We have deeply divided factions on social programs,education, andcrime not easily reconciled.
The mere fact that you can probably type this with a straight face reveals your own ignorance instead. Yes, I am well aware of the divided nature of American history and politics. You however, seem completely oblivious to the basic fact that divided politics is
an inherent feature of every country on the planet. Furthermore, arguing that it is ignorant to compare the Netherlands and the US on any level is in fact demonstrative of your ignorance of
your own history; the United States as a nation, including its political form, was directly inspired by and based on the example of the Dutch republic, and any historian with a background in the period can tell you that the history of the American Republic very much mirrors that of the Dutch Republic. We can most certainly draw historical comparisons. Furthermore, we can also draw more modern comparisons.
16 million people
16,000 square miles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryland
6 million people
12,000 square miles
Yes, and? It is a basic fact that greater population densities increase the risk of crime, irrespective even of cultural factors. The Netherlands is far more densely populated than the US; which would indicate that our crime rate ought to be higher than it is.
When I came to Seattle in the early 90sthere was no gang violence. Gangs migrated north to Portland andSeattle. Now Seattle has carjackings and drive by shootings. CentralAmerican related gangs and drugs.
Nonsense. Literally no more than 5 seconds of googling reveals that in 1993, a study in Seattle showed that members of youth gangs were five times as likely to engage in violent crime as those who were not members of such gangs:
http://www.ojjdp.gov/jjbulletin/9808/youth.html
These things have been happening in Seattle for a lot longer than just now.
And again, making a big point about how you have some examples of violent crime, just goes and shows your ignorance of other countries again. What, you think we don't have organized crime cartels engaging in brutal executions? Hell, I remember them shooting at courthouses with fucking rocket launchers.
It isn't that we don't have the exact same sort of cultural, social, and economic triggers for crime. Because we do. We have impoverished minorities, racial tensions, crime cartels with billions on the line. We have it all. So you can't point to a supposed absence of those things when trying to determine why we have less crime than you do.