steve_bank
Diabetic retinopathy and poor eyesight. Typos ...
Puerto Rico is essentially a welfare state. Staring in the 70s there were tax incentives for business to build in Puerto Rico.
When I worked for Intel in the 80s when they made computers manufacturing and order fulment was done in PR. No sales taxes for one.
PR has had several financial bailouts and their govt is unable to manage their own affairs. Nobody knows where the money went, it did not go to improving and hardening infrastructure.
They were woefully unprepared for a serious storm whatever shortcomings there was in FEMA.
Place the blame on PR administrators more than anything else. It is not the role of the federal government to oversee the functioning of the states. Here in Washing there is a project to harden a series of bridges against earthquakes to ensure relief supply routes into the area. There is Seattle city and regional planning and exercises for big quake. Building codes are updated for quakes. People are periodically encouraged to have an emergency supply of food and water in the home to last several weeks along any medicine needed.
There is a river in the Cascades that floods every year. Eventually a code was enacted requiremeing new buildings to be raised above the high water mark.
The rehab facility I am in has a backup generator and emergency food supplies.
Considering the effects of climate change, is PR sustainable?
And the same question for our east coast. Is there a point to rebuilding on the coast? People live at sea level on islands in storm zones. Should Key West be supported?
Back in the 80s there was a series of storms and flooding along the Mississippi. The corp of engineers for decades tried to control flooding and gave up. Flood plain dwellers were bought out. I believe a town was moved.
New Orleans is below water level. Go figure.
When I worked for Intel in the 80s when they made computers manufacturing and order fulment was done in PR. No sales taxes for one.
PR has had several financial bailouts and their govt is unable to manage their own affairs. Nobody knows where the money went, it did not go to improving and hardening infrastructure.
They were woefully unprepared for a serious storm whatever shortcomings there was in FEMA.
Place the blame on PR administrators more than anything else. It is not the role of the federal government to oversee the functioning of the states. Here in Washing there is a project to harden a series of bridges against earthquakes to ensure relief supply routes into the area. There is Seattle city and regional planning and exercises for big quake. Building codes are updated for quakes. People are periodically encouraged to have an emergency supply of food and water in the home to last several weeks along any medicine needed.
There is a river in the Cascades that floods every year. Eventually a code was enacted requiremeing new buildings to be raised above the high water mark.
The rehab facility I am in has a backup generator and emergency food supplies.
Considering the effects of climate change, is PR sustainable?
And the same question for our east coast. Is there a point to rebuilding on the coast? People live at sea level on islands in storm zones. Should Key West be supported?
Back in the 80s there was a series of storms and flooding along the Mississippi. The corp of engineers for decades tried to control flooding and gave up. Flood plain dwellers were bought out. I believe a town was moved.
New Orleans is below water level. Go figure.
Last edited: