• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Race faker Rachel Dolezal

The alt-right SJWs/snowflakes need someone or something to make them feel better about themselves.
I still you still have no fucking idea what a snowflake actually is.
It is not everybody who starts a thread you disagree with.


0708719d6fe2fb9063e66f3b24f5087c.jpg
 
This "identity by skin color" discussion is ridiculous.
I identify with all with shoesize 37. I identify with all with small noses. Or big noses. Or footsize 42.

We are humans individuals. What group you identifies with is noones business.

Who is Nooney and why are you so obsessed with their feet?
 
OK, "Racial Fluidity" would be a first step in eliminating the notion of race. "Gender Fluidity" did exactly that about sexual identity.. It is no longer binary. A Problem I see with eliminating notions of race with "Fluidity" is the notion of "Cultural Appropriation".. I believe that would be an obstruction to "Racial Fluidity", since race and culture are so closely paired.
 
A lot of this has to do with partially black people being treated as all black and not white at all. If people didn't care, then she would have been seen as 25% black african at most and the rest likely white european.

Her claiming to be "black" at only 25% best case would be considered inaccurate.

Mixed race should be used more. Hell, even using mulatto, quadroon or octaroon is more sensible than calling a 25% black / 75% white person "black". Black is seen as a contamination in this language.
 
We should simply stop caring about "race". The culture is ready. Those who profit from racism are not, and it is they who push it so strongly. I can't even remember the last time I was treated poorly or sworn at for being not white, other than by those who stood to actually profit from doing so. And yes, that also includes those non white people who want to profit from their "oppression".

As for gender, be what you want, but don't expect us to call you by your preferred pronouns. If you identify as a woman, good for you, but doesn't mean I must stop seeing you as a man.
 
That's very magnanimous of you.
 
As for gender, be what you want, but don't expect us to call you by your preferred pronouns. If you identify as a woman, good for you, but doesn't mean I must stop seeing you as a man.

That's fine. It just makes it easier to know who the asshole is.

you: 'Do you prefer James, Jim, Jimmy?'

them: 'I prefer James'

you: 'Yeah, well I'm going to call you Jimmy the JizzEater'

Only if you were concerned with courtesy and politeness would you refer to people according to their preference. (but it's never a requirement).

aa
 
That's fine. It just makes it easier to know who the asshole is.

you: 'Do you prefer James, Jim, Jimmy?'

them: 'I prefer James'

you: 'Yeah, well I'm going to call you Jimmy the JizzEater'

Only if you were concerned with courtesy and politeness would you refer to people according to their preference. (but it's never a requirement).

aa

I prefer "Your Royal Highness Sir James of Camelot". You had better indulge me lest you be an impolite little oik.
 
No, just a few particular people here who whine not because they are personally affected by it but because they have nothing better to complain about. Sorry, I thought that was clear before.

Virtually no one that has a problem with her has been personally affected by it.

So petty beiber/pony level problems then?
 
This is why I like the term trans-man and trans-woman meaning (XX --> ♂) and (XY --> ♀) respectively. It acknowledges chromosomes and gender brain-identity in one word. It also pisses off extremists on both sides.

I would call a transwoman a woman most of the time and a transwoman when it clarified a situation and was needed.

If someone asked "is Jennifer a woman?", I would say "She is a transwoman".
 
This is why I like the term trans-man and trans-woman meaning (XX --> ♂) and (XY --> ♀) respectively. It acknowledges chromosomes and gender brain-identity in one word. It also pisses off extremists on both sides.

I would call a transwoman a woman most of the time and a transwoman when it clarified a situation and was needed.

If someone asked "is Jennifer a woman?", I would say "She is a transwoman".

This has always made the most sense to me.
 
This is why I like the term trans-man and trans-woman meaning (XX --> ♂) and (XY --> ♀) respectively. It acknowledges chromosomes and gender brain-identity in one word. It also pisses off extremists on both sides.

I would call a transwoman a woman most of the time and a transwoman when it clarified a situation and was needed.

If someone asked "is Jennifer a woman?", I would say "She is a transwoman".

First, why is someone asking you if Jennifer is a woman? And if that really happened, why wouldn't a grownup respond by saying, "Ask Jennifer"? Since when does your logic determine what others call themselves?

You say your name here is repoman, but I think I will call you something else according to what I think your name should be, to be determined at my leisure. Your name, your sexual identity and orientation, etc., will be discussed with the terminology that I choose for you. Clearly, like transgender people, you don't have the wherewithal to know what's the best way to refer to yourself.
 
This is why I like the term trans-man and trans-woman meaning (XX --> ♂) and (XY --> ♀) respectively. It acknowledges chromosomes and gender brain-identity in one word. It also pisses off extremists on both sides.

I would call a transwoman a woman most of the time and a transwoman when it clarified a situation and was needed.

If someone asked "is Jennifer a woman?", I would say "She is a transwoman".

This makes sense. And I shall stop being a night owl and start identifying as a morning person. I'll be a trans-am.

- - - Updated - - -

As for gender, be what you want, but don't expect us to call you by your preferred pronouns. If you identify as a woman, good for you, but doesn't mean I must stop seeing you as a man.

That's fine. It just makes it easier to know who the asshole is.

you: 'Do you prefer James, Jim, Jimmy?'

them: 'I prefer James'

you: 'Yeah, well I'm going to call you Jimmy the JizzEater'

Only if you were concerned with courtesy and politeness would you refer to people according to their preference. (but it's never a requirement).

aa

Not really the same thing. Its more like if I demanded that you address me as an actual Penguin (We penguins get quite annoyed at you humans when you don't) or as this lady did, demand that you declare us another race, etc. Or maybe I'll identify as tall.
 
I think Thailand has a better grip on transgender issues than the US.

The transgender are not allowed to change gender on identification and they are clear that transgender are exactly that "kathoey", no more no less. Not that MTF are female only and no questioning or acknowledgment of that FACT is allowed, or on the other side that they will never be women but are only men. The truth is exactly in the middle and the Thai recognize that.

Uptight christians can't deal with reality and liberal loonies can't either. Thai and Indians with their "Hijira" can deal with this reality. Transgender women are transgender women, they are NOT women and they are NOT men.
 
I think Thailand has a better grip on transgender issues than the US.

The transgender are not allowed to change gender on identification and they are clear that transgender are exactly that "kathoey", no more no less. Not that MTF are female only and no questioning or acknowledgment of that FACT is allowed, or on the other side that they will never be women but are only men. The truth is exactly in the middle and the Thai recognize that.

Uptight christians can't deal with reality and liberal loonies can't either. Thai and Indians with their "Hijira" can deal with this reality. Transgender women are transgender women, they are NOT women and they are NOT men.

So in your travels to Thailand have you been with the Ladyboys? Asking for a friend.
 
Back
Top Bottom