• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Republican Path to Victory

boneyard bill

Veteran Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2001
Messages
1,065
Location
Florida
Basic Beliefs
Idealist
While the mainstream media, wrong as usual, focused on immigration as the big issue that produced the defeat of Eric Cantor, a quick look at David Brat's stump speech would make it clear that that is not the case. The primary issue against Cantor was that he was a big proponent of government hand-outs to big business. Even when he mentioned immigration, it was in the context of Cantor complying with big business' desires to lower wages. Now the Beast has discerned a national trend:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/12/big-business-vs-libertarians-in-the-gop.html

"A Washington business consultant has moved to northern California to challenge anti-earmarks Rep. Tom McClintock, because he “thinks representatives should deliver for folks back home,” in the words of a local reporter. 



And that’s just it. It isn’t gay marriage or foreign policy that seems to annoy big and politically connected businesses. They just object that libertarian legislators don’t play the game, don’t bring home the bacon, and actually take seriously the limited government ideas that most Republicans only pay lip service to."

" 
In an interview with the Weekly Standard, Ellis strikingly dismissed Amash’s principled, constitutional stand: “He’s got his explanations for why he’s voted, but I don’t really care. I’m a businessman, I look at the bottom line. If something is unconstitutional, we have a court system that looks at that.” 
 


Most members of Congress vote for unconstitutional bills. Few of them make it an explicit campaign promise. 


As with all these libertarian-leaning officials, Amash has friends as well as enemies among the business community. Several members of Amway’s DeVos and Van Andel families have contributed to his re-election, and he remains popular with national free-market groups. 


“He’s the gold standard of principled constitutionalism in Congress,” Dean Clancy, then vice president of public policy at FreedomWorks, told The Hill newspaper. “We have heard that the K Street establishment wants to knock him off — and we intend to defend him punch-for-punch.” 
"

"
This clash between politically minded businessmen and free-market libertarians is an old one. Adam Smith wrote “The Wealth of Nations” to denounce mercantilism, the crony capitalism of his day. Milton Friedman wrote, “There’s a common misconception that people who are in favor of a free market are also in favor of everything that big business does. Nothing could be further from the truth.” 
 


T. J. Rodgers, the outspoken CEO of Cypress Semiconductor, worries about the corrupting interplay between business and the Republican establishment: “The political scene in Washington is antithetical to the core values that drive our success in the international marketplace and risks converting entrepreneurs into statist businessmen….Republicans claim that their party stands for free markets, but they have proven [in the Bush years] to be as big spenders as are the Democrats.” 
 


That’s what the liberty movement is trying to change, and business leaders who try to purge libertarian-minded office holders just confirm their suspicions. "

I should like to point out that incumbent Democrats are just as vulnerable to charges of crony capitalism as Republicans are, perhaps even more so. So while Democrats have had a field day accusing Republicans of "tax cuts for the rich," they may find themselves rather embarrassed when they use that argument against a libertarian Republican who points out that that same Democrat voted to give tons on money to big businesses that they insist that we should tax.

Currently the Chamber of Commerce, the loudest voice for big business, is going after people like Justin Amash, Tom McClintock, and others but the number of liberty Congressmen has been growing, and while Rand Paul hasn't made crony capitalism the dominant theme of his campaign in quite the way that David Brat has, he has shown himself willing to mention it in most of his speeches. If it catches on, expect other GOP candidates to follow suit.
 
When I was sixteen, I had a summer job with an engineering company. I got to listen to the men discuss politics most of day. When they talked about our Congressman, the main complaint was, "He hasn't brought any work to the district." This was 1972. Things don't change that much.
 
Several members of Amway’s DeVos and Van Andel families have contributed to his re-election, and he remains popular with national free-market groups. 


“He’s the gold standard of principled constitutionalism in Congress,” Dean Clancy, then vice president of public policy at FreedomWorks, told The Hill newspaper.

I'm not sure which of these two items are more hilarious. Your new "libertarian" candidate...supported by the just-shy-of-a-pyramid-scheme Amway folks, and a group run by arguably the biggest crony capitalists in a generation.


Free market, my ass.
 
When I was sixteen, I had a summer job with an engineering company. I got to listen to the men discuss politics most of day. When they talked about our Congressman, the main complaint was, "He hasn't brought any work to the district." This was 1972. Things don't change that much.

What's changed is that nobody is bringing jobs to anywhere. You can hardly find a job today that isn't part-time. Today, people are aware that something is terribly wrong, and that the policies of our leaders aren't working. We're borrowing more and more money to create worse and worse and worse jobs.
 
Several members of Amway’s DeVos and Van Andel families have contributed to his re-election, and he remains popular with national free-market groups. 


“He’s the gold standard of principled constitutionalism in Congress,” Dean Clancy, then vice president of public policy at FreedomWorks, told The Hill newspaper.

I'm not sure which of these two items are more hilarious. Your new "libertarian" candidate...supported by the just-shy-of-a-pyramid-scheme Amway folks, and a group run by arguably the biggest crony capitalists in a generation.


Free market, my ass.

Have the Amway people accepted any federal money? What groups contributing to Freedom Works are crony capitalists? Has Amash voted to fund any profit-making corporations? If you're going to comment, you should be prepared to back up your claims with facts.
 
If you're going to comment, you should be prepared to back up your claims with facts.

If you're going to claim that Amway and the Koch Brothers aren't trying to game the system in favor of their businesses, and are just honest libertarians with an interest in nothing more than freedom, you should be prepared to set aside the crack pipe you're obviously hitting too hard.
 
I'm not sure which of these two items are more hilarious. Your new "libertarian" candidate...supported by the just-shy-of-a-pyramid-scheme Amway folks, and a group run by arguably the biggest crony capitalists in a generation.


Free market, my ass.

Have the Amway people accepted any federal money? What groups contributing to Freedom Works are crony capitalists? Has Amash voted to fund any profit-making corporations? If you're going to comment, you should be prepared to back up your claims with facts.

Don't businesses that have predatory practices also count?
 
When I was sixteen, I had a summer job with an engineering company. I got to listen to the men discuss politics most of day. When they talked about our Congressman, the main complaint was, "He hasn't brought any work to the district." This was 1972. Things don't change that much.

What's changed is that nobody is bringing jobs to anywhere. You can hardly find a job today that isn't part-time. Today, people are aware that something is terribly wrong, and that the policies of our leaders aren't working. We're borrowing more and more money to create worse and worse and worse jobs.

What backwater state do you live in? We've been at full employment for over a year. I have headhunters calling me. The governor is beginning to discuss the labor shortage. The only real issue is here is that industry is refusing to pay qualified people enough to get them to change jobs.
 
Have the Amway people accepted any federal money?
Not that we can tell, but it needs influence to keep from having Congress outlaw multi-level marketing scams that prey on people.
What groups contributing to Freedom Works are crony capitalists?
Good question. What groups are contributing to Freedom Works in the first place? Their main contributions come from a mysterious corporation headquartered in an unoccupied suburban Knoxville home. It's obviously a fine upstanding citizen and not say the Chinese, because only a private citizen would need to set up a mysterious corporate entity to donate tens of millions of dollars to a totally legitimate grassroots organization.

Too bad we will never know if the contributions are on the up and up or from those who seek to destroy America.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/27/specialty-group-inc-donation_n_2031207.html
 
When I was sixteen, I had a summer job with an engineering company. I got to listen to the men discuss politics most of day. When they talked about our Congressman, the main complaint was, "He hasn't brought any work to the district." This was 1972. Things don't change that much.

What's changed is that nobody is bringing jobs to anywhere. You can hardly find a job today that isn't part-time. Today, people are aware that something is terribly wrong, and that the policies of our leaders aren't working. We're borrowing more and more money to create worse and worse and worse jobs.

One of the legacies of Huey P. Long in Louisiana is the idea that government can be an engine of economic growth. In the first half of the 20th century, there were many parishes in the state where local and state government were the only source of cash wage jobs. Everything else was agricultural or small retail. During Long's tenure as Governor, many small drawbridges were built to link coastal communities with the rest of the state. These bridges were operated by hand. A crew of four men walked a large windlass to open and close the bridge. Men would be on call for 48 hour shifts, which paid a small amount, with extra if actually called to work the bridge. This system put a dozen or more men on the state payroll, while a conventional diesel engine operated bridge might have employed two or three, at the most.

This is also the reason Louisiana, a state of 4.6 million people has 21 four year university campuses, spread across the state. When it comes to bring money back to the home district, a college campus beats a drawbridge, any day. Today we are saddled with this top heavy higher education system and a starving secondary school system. The colleges all have power political patrons. If one can imagine the political benefits of snaring a college location for the old home town, imagine what happens to the man who lets one be closed.

Our current Republican Governor has sold his soul to Metastophlez for some high elected office, yet to be named. He has cut state provided medical benefits and replaced them with private contractors. We have a thriving private contractor prison system, as well. One thing he hasn't touched is our university systems.

In reference to your OP, the real problem with earmarks is not the actual money, it's that earmarks are anonymous. Congressmen do not have to account for why they want the money, because no one knows who asked for it.
 
Cantor was taken by surprise. Elsewhere, the TP candidates have not fared so well against the GOP establishment.

This infighting neutralizes much of the rights financial advantage.

So I say: go Tea Party Patriots don't take no shit from nobody!
 
While the mainstream media, wrong as usual, focused on immigration as the big issue that produced the defeat of Eric Cantor, a quick look at David Brat's stump speech would make it clear that that is not the case. The primary issue against Cantor was that he was a big proponent of government hand-outs to big business. Even when he mentioned immigration, it was in the context of Cantor complying with big business' desires to lower wages. Now the Beast has discerned a national trend:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/06/12/big-business-vs-libertarians-in-the-gop.html

"A Washington business consultant has moved to northern California to challenge anti-earmarks Rep. Tom McClintock, because he “thinks representatives should deliver for folks back home,” in the words of a local reporter. 



And that’s just it. It isn’t gay marriage or foreign policy that seems to annoy big and politically connected businesses. They just object that libertarian legislators don’t play the game, don’t bring home the bacon, and actually take seriously the limited government ideas that most Republicans only pay lip service to."

" 
In an interview with the Weekly Standard, Ellis strikingly dismissed Amash’s principled, constitutional stand: “He’s got his explanations for why he’s voted, but I don’t really care. I’m a businessman, I look at the bottom line. If something is unconstitutional, we have a court system that looks at that.” 
 


Most members of Congress vote for unconstitutional bills. Few of them make it an explicit campaign promise. 


As with all these libertarian-leaning officials, Amash has friends as well as enemies among the business community. Several members of Amway’s DeVos and Van Andel families have contributed to his re-election, and he remains popular with national free-market groups. 


“He’s the gold standard of principled constitutionalism in Congress,” Dean Clancy, then vice president of public policy at FreedomWorks, told The Hill newspaper. “We have heard that the K Street establishment wants to knock him off — and we intend to defend him punch-for-punch.” 
"

"
This clash between politically minded businessmen and free-market libertarians is an old one. Adam Smith wrote “The Wealth of Nations” to denounce mercantilism, the crony capitalism of his day. Milton Friedman wrote, “There’s a common misconception that people who are in favor of a free market are also in favor of everything that big business does. Nothing could be further from the truth.” 
 


T. J. Rodgers, the outspoken CEO of Cypress Semiconductor, worries about the corrupting interplay between business and the Republican establishment: “The political scene in Washington is antithetical to the core values that drive our success in the international marketplace and risks converting entrepreneurs into statist businessmen….Republicans claim that their party stands for free markets, but they have proven [in the Bush years] to be as big spenders as are the Democrats.” 
 


That’s what the liberty movement is trying to change, and business leaders who try to purge libertarian-minded office holders just confirm their suspicions. "

I should like to point out that incumbent Democrats are just as vulnerable to charges of crony capitalism as Republicans are, perhaps even more so. So while Democrats have had a field day accusing Republicans of "tax cuts for the rich," they may find themselves rather embarrassed when they use that argument against a libertarian Republican who points out that that same Democrat voted to give tons on money to big businesses that they insist that we should tax.

Currently the Chamber of Commerce, the loudest voice for big business, is going after people like Justin Amash, Tom McClintock, and others but the number of liberty Congressmen has been growing, and while Rand Paul hasn't made crony capitalism the dominant theme of his campaign in quite the way that David Brat has, he has shown himself willing to mention it in most of his speeches. If it catches on, expect other GOP candidates to follow suit.

Interesting, but pure BS.

Cantor lost because he had not kept in touch with his constituents. It's a very local reason for one to lose a local race. Ever hear the saying "All politics are local"? Of course you have. Republicans are pretty good at it too. It's when some go off the reservation, aspire to 'greater' things or good, whatever, that they can't hold office. Had he managed to win the primary he'd have lost the general election. That's the real point.

Isn't it amusing how every party wonk has his own wand.
 
One of the legacies of Huey P. Long in Louisiana is the idea that government can be an engine of economic growth. In the first half of the 20th century, there were many parishes in the state where local and state government were the only source of cash wage jobs. Everything else was agricultural or small retail. During Long's tenure as Governor, many small drawbridges were built to link coastal communities with the rest of the state. These bridges were operated by hand. A crew of four men walked a large windlass to open and close the bridge. Men would be on call for 48 hour shifts, which paid a small amount, with extra if actually called to work the bridge. This system put a dozen or more men on the state payroll, while a conventional diesel engine operated bridge might have employed two or three, at the most.

This is also the reason Louisiana, a state of 4.6 million people has 21 four year university campuses, spread across the state. When it comes to bring money back to the home district, a college campus beats a drawbridge, any day. Today we are saddled with this top heavy higher education system and a starving secondary school system. The colleges all have power political patrons. If one can imagine the political benefits of snaring a college location for the old home town, imagine what happens to the man who lets one be closed.

Our current Republican Governor has sold his soul to Metastophlez for some high elected office, yet to be named. He has cut state provided medical benefits and replaced them with private contractors. We have a thriving private contractor prison system, as well. One thing he hasn't touched is our university systems.

In reference to your OP, the real problem with earmarks is not the actual money, it's that earmarks are anonymous. Congressmen do not have to account for why they want the money, because no one knows who asked for it.

I like your post with one exception.

Its obvious home pride was at work when you spouted about 21 four year colleges in a 4.6 million person state. Yeah, you have LSU and Tulane and perhaps a Kresge Foundation funded Institute. But that pales to the college creds of smaller states like Oregon. With 3.8 million souls Oregon boasts major universities UO, OSU, PSU, along with top fifty schools like Lewis and Clark, Reed, Oregon Health and Science University a Kresge Foundation grantee, along with 27 other four year colleges and universities. Ever hear of Wayne Morse the only member of congress to vote against going to war in Vietnam? If you want to consider the smarmy side of good ole Huey Oregon has it's Mark Hatfield. But enough.

Your post is spot one sans the boasting. Atta Gee.
 
.

I like your post with one exception.

Its obvious home pride was at work when you spouted about 21 four year colleges in a 4.6 million person state. Yeah, you have LSU and Tulane and perhaps a Kresge Foundation funded Institute. But that pales to the college creds of smaller states like Oregon. With 3.8 million souls Oregon boasts major universities UO, OSU, PSU, along with top fifty schools like Lewis and Clark, Reed, Oregon Health and Science University a Kresge Foundation grantee, along with 27 other four year colleges and universities. Ever hear of Wayne Morse the only member of congress to vote against going to war in Vietnam? If you want to consider the smarmy side of good ole Huey Oregon has it's Mark Hatfield. But enough.

Your post is spot one sans the boasting. Atta Gee.

I wasn't boasting. It was an embarrassing admission.

Louisiana's four University Systems, with their 21 campuses, each with its own Board of Directors, President, Chancellor, and all related administration costs is a millstone around our neck. Since we can't delete any single campus, or combine administration, the only other choice is to reduce the resources given to all, which decreases the ability of all to provide an education.

I'm sure Oregon has universities which are the envy of the other states. Do they have football teams?
 
The republican path to victory:

Step 1, consume 10-20 sleeping pills
Step 2, drink a handle of vodka
Step 3, sit in your garage with your engine running for 30 minutes

This winning republican strategy works best when steps are initiated within a 5 minute period. Successful an timely execution of this agenda is guaranteed to contribute to a resounding victory for all mankind.
 
.

I like your post with one exception.

Its obvious home pride was at work when you spouted about 21 four year colleges in a 4.6 million person state. Yeah, you have LSU and Tulane and perhaps a Kresge Foundation funded Institute. But that pales to the college creds of smaller states like Oregon. With 3.8 million souls Oregon boasts major universities UO, OSU, PSU, along with top fifty schools like Lewis and Clark, Reed, Oregon Health and Science University a Kresge Foundation grantee, along with 27 other four year colleges and universities. Ever hear of Wayne Morse the only member of congress to vote against going to war in Vietnam? If you want to consider the smarmy side of good ole Huey Oregon has it's Mark Hatfield. But enough.

Your post is spot one sans the boasting. Atta Gee.

I wasn't boasting. It was an embarrassing admission.

Louisiana's four University Systems, with their 21 campuses, each with its own Board of Directors, President, Chancellor, and all related administration costs is a millstone around our neck. Since we can't delete any single campus, or combine administration, the only other choice is to reduce the resources given to all, which decreases the ability of all to provide an education.

I'm sure Oregon has universities which are the envy of the other states. Do they have football teams?

Psst: Research, not football is where the BIG money is.
 
Back
Top Bottom