• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Republicans Always "Narrowly Win"...

I think you fail to see how that applies to anyone else because you choose to. Because you have backed yourself into a corner. But just in case you really cant see it, exposing somebody as a hypocrite doesn't have to mean exposing that to themselves. It could mean (and does mean) exposing them (here Republicans) as a hypocrite to everyone (not just Republicans).

Of course they would be exposed to everyone. No one said elsewise. But now you are moving the goalposts and complaining about something no one ever said. Everyone that read it the first time understood it to mean expose them to everyone. Making another excuse for your useless and stupid comment.

Instead of wasting everyone's time, why don't you just say "Sorry, I worded that poorly. My bad. This is what I meant to say." Then do so. But no, you have to troll people who take your words for what they are.

You are the one who decided to reply to what I wrote with a snide and stupid remark and derail the thread. Perhaps it is you who should apologize to everyone. Set an example for the group, Mr. Admin.

Snide? I thought it was quite clever. No accounting for taste.

BTW, I don't hold myself up as an example for anyone. It's not my responsibility to guide others through life rules. If you require a life coach, I suggest you look elsewhere.

Since english isn't your first language, what is your first language?

Tagalog was my first language. What was yours?

Maybe another ESL course is due.
 
Of course they would be exposed to everyone. No one said elsewise. But now you are moving the goalposts and complaining about something no one ever said. Everyone that read it the first time understood it to mean expose them to everyone.

Except apparently you, who just demanded it meant only Republicans. *shrug* What I wrote initially remains true. Your snide and useless and goading remark remains just that.

You are the one who decided to reply to what I wrote with a snide and stupid remark and derail the thread. Perhaps it is you who should apologize to everyone. Set an example for the group, Mr. Admin.

Snide? I thought it was quite clever. No accounting for taste.

It was a clear example of goading, and a clear demonstration that you admins don't follow your own so-called rules. I was perfectly polite in what I wrote. It is you who decided to be an ass, and the thread derailed from there.

Since english isn't your first language, what is your first language?

Tagalog was my first language. What was yours?

Maybe another ESL course is due.

I ask again: Is English your first language? Maybe you do need an ESL course, because it is you who failed at reading comprehension here.
 
...wherever there is electoral funny business going on.
Anyone else think there might be something strange about that?

Hackers may have gained ‘almost total control’ of an election server in Georgia, report says

Republican Brian Kemp narrowly beat Democrat Stacey Abrams during the 2018 gubernatorial race, in which he ran while serving as Georgia’s secretary of state....
“We know there was no way to audit” the results of the previous elections, Ms Marks said. “There was no … attempt at accountability by the secretary of state, and the entire programming of elections was outsourced.”

“What Logan’s findings show us,” she added, “is that vulnerabilities were not just hypothetical as the state had been claiming. Now we know that it was a very real risk, but what we don’t know is just how bad did it get. And the public deserves to know.”

Kinda reminiscent of those 3 precincts in Ohio that Bush "won" by the exact same percentage, while exit polling indicated that he had lost.
It's not news that Republicans cheat, nor is it news that they are proud of it, considering their ability and willingness to cheat an indication that they are "smart".
Still, it's sad commentary on the state of the Republic, and on the nature of humanity in general.

You are a crazy tinfoil conspiracy theorist. Or at least that is what people are claimed to be on this board when they see possible failings of a government system we are supposed to have complete faith in.

Jimmy Higgens where are you?

Or will this be some sort of a double standard now considering a liberal ox is getting gored?
 
Except apparently you, who just demanded it meant only Republicans. *shrug* What I wrote initially remains true. Your snide and useless and goading remark remains just that.

The shaming was of course meant to be against Republicans only. That it was to be a public shaming is, of course, obvious.

The statement itself though was so simple-minded and displayed such a stunning lack of awareness of US politics you should have been embarrassed for making it. That you make so many similar statements from such a high horse just adds to the irony.

And if the Captain Obvious term offends you, get thicker skin. It's a common phrase in English linguistics and it's even used in commercials.
 
And if the Captain Obvious term offends you, get thicker skin. It's a common phrase in English linguistics and it's even used in commercials.

It isn't your belligerent attitude that I find offensive. It's your hypocrisy. You have been nothing but bellicose this entire thread. When I politely wrote what I did you could have politely disagreed, but that's apparently beyond you. You goad continuously, and you chastise others with "infractions" for "goading". If you ran a board where everyone was free to speak at your level that would be one thing, but you are a hypocrite who demands civil discussion and then refuses to follow your own so called rules. That is what's obvious, captain.
 
And if the Captain Obvious term offends you, get thicker skin. It's a common phrase in English linguistics and it's even used in commercials.

It isn't your belligerent attitude that I find offensive. It's your hypocrisy. You have been nothing but bellicose this entire thread. When I politely wrote what I did you could have politely disagreed, but that's apparently beyond you. You goad continuously, and you chastise others with "infractions" for "goading". If you ran a board where everyone was free to speak at your level that would be one thing, but you are a hypocrite who demands civil discussion and then refuses to follow your own so called rules. That is what's obvious, captain.

I've never given anyone an infraction for anything and I have been edited by the mods several times myself. Your constant wrong assumptions and your whining like a little girl when someone says some as simple as Captain Obvious to you is what is an embarrassment to the board.
 
And if the Captain Obvious term offends you, get thicker skin. It's a common phrase in English linguistics and it's even used in commercials.

It isn't your belligerent attitude that I find offensive. It's your hypocrisy. You have been nothing but bellicose this entire thread. When I politely wrote what I did you could have politely disagreed, but that's apparently beyond you. You goad continuously, and you chastise others with "infractions" for "goading". If you ran a board where everyone was free to speak at your level that would be one thing, but you are a hypocrite who demands civil discussion and then refuses to follow your own so called rules. That is what's obvious, captain.

I've never given anyone an infraction for anything and I have been edited by the mods several times myself. Your constant wrong assumptions and your whining like a little girl when someone says some as simple as Captain Obvious to you is what is an embarrassment to the board.

Ah yes. Now I am a little girl. Not goading at all. And the administrator of the board who talks to people in the moderator private feedback doesn't at all have any power. [removed]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've never given anyone an infraction for anything and I have been edited by the mods several times myself. Your constant wrong assumptions and your whining like a little girl when someone says some as simple as Captain Obvious to you is what is an embarrassment to the board.

Ah yes. Now I am a little girl. Not goading at all. And the administrator of the board who talks to people in the moderator private feedback doesn't at all have any power. You are [consistency] to be commended for helping in a large way to help keep this board online. [consistency].
FIFY
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've never given anyone an infraction for anything and I have been edited by the mods several times myself. Your constant wrong assumptions and your whining like a little girl when someone says some as simple as Captain Obvious to you is what is an embarrassment to the board.

Ah yes. Now I am a little girl. Not goading at all. And the administrator of the board who talks to people in the moderator private feedback doesn't at all have any power.[consistency]
It's clear that this message board (maybe message boards in general) isn't for you. Maybe you should consider joining a different one. It is entirely within your control, you know.

Alternatively, you could try learning the phrase(s) (copy and paste if you must) "I didn't realize that." "Thanks, I learned something new." or some variation thereof. It will serve you in good stead, not just on message boards.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
RVonse said:
You are a crazy tinfoil conspiracy theorist. Or at least that is what people are claimed to be on this board when they see possible failings of a government system we are supposed to have complete faith in.

Jimmy Higgens where are you?

Or will this be some sort of a double standard now considering a liberal ox is getting gored?
I wanted to ask Elixir about the three precinct claim as I don't recall it, nor could I find any reference to it. As to the Ohio results in 2004, it was an odd bird, that got odder. Specifically in counties where Kerry received fewer votes than the long-shot Democrat candidate for Supreme Court. Additionally, the gap to W didn't seem to tighten when the urban counties started coming in.

Then a statewide recount was demanded by the Green Party after a fundraiser. It was meant to be a full recount, but most counties managed to miraculously not need full recounts as they got precincts to match up to their official totals, maybe that is what Elixir misremembered.

Ohio would be the state where Diebold (electronic voting machine company) was. And where the CEO of the company stated in a letter to the GOP, he'd be certain to "helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes" to W. The press from that was start of further criticism, that Diebold needed to rebrand their voting machine company to Premier Election Solutions. There was no direct evidence pointing to vote manipulation fraud... but all of the discrepancies ended up heading in W's favor, with a little help from Ken Stockwell.

As far as Georgia, we know for a fact that the Secretary of State enacted policy to work in his favor for the election... much like how Katherine Harris saw to it that the right cards were dealt to W in 2000.

And we know that experts were jumping and shouting regarding inadequacies of voting machines prior to the 2006 election that led to updates and fixes of the machines. Some even dropped the touch screens altogether.
 
...wherever there is electoral funny business going on.
Anyone else think there might be something strange about that?

Hackers may have gained ‘almost total control’ of an election server in Georgia, report says

Republican Brian Kemp narrowly beat Democrat Stacey Abrams during the 2018 gubernatorial race, in which he ran while serving as Georgia’s secretary of state....
“We know there was no way to audit” the results of the previous elections, Ms Marks said. “There was no … attempt at accountability by the secretary of state, and the entire programming of elections was outsourced.”

“What Logan’s findings show us,” she added, “is that vulnerabilities were not just hypothetical as the state had been claiming. Now we know that it was a very real risk, but what we don’t know is just how bad did it get. And the public deserves to know.”

Kinda reminiscent of those 3 precincts in Ohio that Bush "won" by the exact same percentage, while exit polling indicated that he had lost.
It's not news that Republicans cheat, nor is it news that they are proud of it, considering their ability and willingness to cheat an indication that they are "smart".
Still, it's sad commentary on the state of the Republic, and on the nature of humanity in general.

You are a crazy tinfoil conspiracy theorist.

Prolly right - I've been a government contractor for over a decade, so I guess that qualifies. So far, their checks don't bounce though - they're just late.

Or will this be some sort of a double standard now considering a liberal ox is getting gored?

The goring of oxen is a fairly egalitarian pursuit. If there's money, the powers that be at any given moment want it. Some (Republicans) are willing to go to further extremes to appropriate it than are others (Democrats) as a rule. But I am trying really hard to come up with an example of Democrats rigging elections anything like what happened in NC a couple of years ago, or in the Presidential election of 2016, and I'm drawing a blank - maybe you can help me out there, RVonse?
 
I've never given anyone an infraction for anything and I have been edited by the mods several times myself. Your constant wrong assumptions and your whining like a little girl when someone says some as simple as Captain Obvious to you is what is an embarrassment to the board.

Ah yes. Now I am a little girl. Not goading at all. And the administrator of the board who talks to people in the moderator private feedback doesn't at all have any power. You are both a liar and an asshole. Now go ahead and get me banned for saying so, and prove your hypocrisy further.

Being called a little girl should not be an insult.
Moreover, I do not think it is accurate to say that Jolly is “whining like a little girl”. He is whining like a man.

Little girls are pretty powerful creatures. And for whining, they ain’t got nuthin’ on old men. As we can see in the world.

But seriously, can we stop using girls and women as an example of a bad way to be? It’s pretty offensive.
 
Back
Top Bottom