Rice family lawyers request DOJ investigation into conduct of prosecutor's office

[repoman]

This is a great video, need more cops like this:



and this is one with a guy who sounds like a good old boy, but is also really cool. Could be Bronzeage:

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

The cited story does not mention BLM. What evidence leads you to conclude this poster is the product of BLMers?

They referenced Tamir Rice and race war. Who else do you think they might be? Occupy Oregon?

The flier is disturbing, but it is also a bit unbalanced.

"Don't be a Martyr", "Get away with it" seems almost hyperbolically provocative, as is the alleged reward offered for "anonymous collection". There is no evidence this was produced by an African American, forget a #BLM'er.

 

[atrib]

This is not mere posturing, these are criminal threats. DO you think that the perpetrators should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law?

If they are breaking a law in their jurisdiction, and the police and DA there believe the threat to be credible, then yes. The real question is, why are you so concerned about real or imagined threats posed by unhappy protesters, but are not championing for the prosecution of rogue police who are killing people on the streets with the same zeal? Why are you not on the rooftops calling for the authorities to go after these criminals with badges with the intensity that you use to spread your vitriol against protesters.

But so far not a peep out of him concerning the people that have been killed in real life by the reckless and callous actions of rogue police officers. Shame on you.

I've said plenty about them too. I acknowledged that police made mistakes in the Tamir Rice case. I said that the killing of Walter Scott was criminal as well. Your claim about "not a peep" is demonstrably false.

You cannot stop talking about how outraged you are over people protesting police killings by blocking roads, and how offensive you find the BLM movement. But you are willing to write off the killing of a 12 year old kid playing with a toy gun in public in an open carry state and the subsequent efforts by the police to lie about the details of the incident as a mere accident? Why no outrage over the killing? Why aren't you calling for the aggressive prosecution of the murderous police who killed this kid, or the prosecution of their supervisors who lied to the public to cover up the facts and were later exposed through the release of the video? Why no outrage here?

Instead of championing justice for the victims, you spend your time characterizing them as thugs and dindus, people undeserving of protection under the law. I find your posts to be repulsive, and lacking in humanity and empathy.

 

[laughing dog]

The cited story does not mention BLM. What evidence leads you to conclude this poster is the product of BLMers?

They referenced Tamir Rice and race war. Who else do you think they might be? Occupy Oregon?

It could be anyone with a beef. It could be douchebags trying to dupe gullible jackasses into thinking it is BLMers.

 

[Derec]

It could be anyone with a beef. It could be douchebags trying to dupe gullible jackasses into thinking it is BLMers.

Or it could be angry #BLMers - it fits their angry hatred. Remember "pigs in a blanket fry them like bacon" or "put wings on pigs"? Or do you think these were false flag operations too?

 

[laughing dog]

It could be anyone with a beef. It could be douchebags trying to dupe gullible jackasses into thinking it is BLMers.

Or it could be angry #BLMers - it fits their angry hatred. Remember "pigs in a blanket fry them like bacon" or "put wings on pigs"? Or do you think these were false flag operations too?

Of course it might be anyone. It could be you. But the fact it could be _____ doesn't justify anyone claiming as FACT a particular group or person as the author. You really are not fooling anyone.

 

[Derec]

If they are breaking a law in their jurisdiction, and the police and DA there believe the threat to be credible, then yes.

Well behind all the superfluous conditionals, that's at least something.

The real question is, why are you so concerned about real or imagined threats posed by unhappy protesters, but are not championing for the prosecution of rogue police who are killing people on the streets with the same zeal? Why are you not on the rooftops calling for the authorities to go after these criminals with badges with the intensity that you use to spread your vitriol against protesters.

- those are real threats.
- I do not think vast majority of police shootings are done by "criminals with badges".

You cannot stop talking about how outraged you are over people protesting police killings by blocking roads, and how offensive you find the BLM movement.

Yes, they have this undeserved aura of righteousness but they are a bunch of criminals usually protesting police killing of thugs like Michael Brown, Jamar Clark, Mario Woods ...

But you are willing to write off the killing of a 12 year old kid playing with a toy gun in public in an open carry state and the subsequent efforts by the police to lie about the details of the incident as a mere accident?

This case is a tragic concatenation of circumstances where many of the participants made mistakes - including Tamir himself and his parents. Btw, what "lies" are you talking about?

Why no outrage over the killing? Why aren't you calling for the aggressive prosecution of the murderous police who killed this kid, or the prosecution of their supervisors who lied to the public to cover up the facts and were later exposed through the release of the video? Why no outrage here?

Because I do not think a murder has been committed.

Instead of championing justice for the victims, you spend your time characterizing them as thugs and dindus, people undeserving of protection under the law.

I call only thugs and dindus thugs and dindus. I never called Tamir Rice a thug for example.

I find your posts to be repulsive, and lacking in humanity and empathy.

And I find your posts naive and lacking in realism and critical thinking.

- - - Updated - - -

Of course it might be anyone. It could be you.

I have an alibi.

But the fact it could be _____ doesn't justify anyone claiming as FACT a particular group or person as the author. You really are not fooling anyone.

When you hear hoofs think horses - unless and until you have a reason to believe it might be zebras. I have no reason to think this flier is not the work of the #BLM crowd.

 

[laughing dog]

When you hear hoofs think horses - unless and until you have a reason to believe it might be zebras. I have no reason to think this flier is not the work of the #BLM crowd.

That is simply false. There is no evidence outside of your mind that indicates who is the author.

But I will take your advice. When you hear the sizzling of cross burning and the pitter patter of the KKK, you think of ignorant, racist assholes.

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Or it could be angry #BLMers - it fits their angry hatred. Remember "pigs in a blanket fry them like bacon" or "put wings on pigs"? Or do you think these were false flag operations too?

Of course it might be anyone. It could be you. But the fact it could be _____ doesn't justify anyone claiming as FACT a particular group or person as the author. You really are not fooling anyone.

Can't rule out Glen Beck who hasn't denied producing it.

There are people on both sides who have agendas to promote by producing such a flier. What makes me think it wasn't an extremist black is the reward offer. It seems completely unnecessary and another hook being added to the flier. An extremist wouldn't need a half million dollar payout to go out and doing something extreme. More importantly, if someone was extremist enough to put forth a flier with the intent of trying to get the prosecutor killed, they'd probably be extreme enough to do it themselves.

The dollar sign also feels like a poke at blacks for looking dumb.

The flier just feels a bit fake in its outrage. But it is possible a black extremist made it. But I'd hedge the other direction. I have been wrong in the past, so take my review with a chunk of salt.

 

[Nice Squirrel]

Also remember if the person producing the flyer had attended, witnessed, or heard of a Black Lives Matter rally...or had the right levels of melanin, they were part of the leadership of the Black Lives Matter terrorist organization and orchestrated this at all levels.

 

[Rhea]

What makes me think it wasn't an extremist black is the reward offer. It seems completely unnecessary and another hook being added to the flier. An extremist wouldn't need a half million dollar payout to go out and doing something extreme. More importantly, if someone was extremist enough to put forth a flier with the intent of trying to get the prosecutor killed, they'd probably be extreme enough to do it themselves.

The dollar sign also feels like a poke at blacks for looking dumb.

The flier just feels a bit fake in its outrage. But it is possible a black extremist made it. But I'd hedge the other direction. I have been wrong in the past, so take my review with a chunk of salt.

Plus with all the "N"s printed backward, someone had to deliberately turn those characters around. That's an on-purpose attempt to make it look like it was done by the stupid. That can't happen accidentally.

 

[Nice Squirrel]

Why would BLM use #racewar? - that's a white supremacist term.

 

[Nice Squirrel]

The $500,000 is obviously fake. You could arrange a hit for far less.

What?

What are you looking at?

no I don't know how to arrange a hit job.

 

[Derec]

Why would BLM use #racewar? - that's a white supremacist term.

Oh really?

 

[ZiprHead]

It could be anyone with a beef. It could be douchebags trying to dupe gullible jackasses into thinking it is BLMers.

Or it could be angry #BLMers - it fits their angry hatred. Remember "pigs in a blanket fry them like bacon" or "put wings on pigs"? Or do you think these were false flag operations too?

Do you really think the BLM folks have half a million bucks?

 

[Derec]

Do you really think the BLM folks have half a million bucks?

Quite probably.
Major donors consider funding Black Lives Matter

 

[Nice Squirrel]

Do you really think the BLM folks have half a million bucks?

Quite probably.
Major donors consider funding Black Lives Matter

Yes, and they are obviously meeting to fund assassinations and make payouts to violent individuals. What is wrong with you?

 

[Derec]

Yes, and they are obviously meeting to fund assassinations and make payouts to violent individuals. What is wrong with you?

No, but once they give the money it's hard to control where all of it goes. Obviously not all of it is spent on posting bail and paying fines or on enhancing DeRay McKesson's lifestyle.

 

[Nice Squirrel]

Why would BLM use #racewar? - that's a white supremacist term.

Oh really?

Breitbart video?
Interesting. You might want to check the sound on your computer. She responded to the question with that things will eventually lead to a race war, not let's start a race war. But fine, she scares you.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes, and they are obviously meeting to fund assassinations and make payouts to violent individuals. What is wrong with you?

No, but once they give the money it's hard to control where all of it goes. Obviously not all of it is spent on posting bail and paying fines or on enhancing DeRay McKesson's lifestyle.

I take it you have not worked with grants and foundations?

 

[Derec]

Interesting. You might want to check the sound on your computer. She responded to the question with that things will eventually lead to a race war, not let's start a race war.

You may want to do the same. She calls white people "blue eyed devils" (standard black supremacist expression) and than talks about the race war. That defeats the claim that "race war" is somehow a "white supremacist" expression.
Is there any black radical, racist or supremacist that you will not defend Nice Squirrel?

But fine, she scares you.

People like her actually do, yes. Not only because of her angry racism but also because she enjoys a great level of sympathy from white left-winger fifth columnists.

I take it you have not worked with grants and foundations?

BLM is not a foundation. It's a loose collection of radicals.