so, you must then want to support the access to and even distribution of long-acting reversible contraceptives (such as IUDs) for women.
Yes, I'd even make it mandatory.
Yikes! What kind of person wants to force all women to have mandatory contraceptives!
Not all women.
Just the ones who are ignorant of biology101 and who say they don't want to get pregnant or have an abortion.
....if that's the only way to prevent 1 million abortions per year in the US
It’s not, as was clearly shown in the unequivocal data you were shown.
I was told it is
demonstrably one of the
best ways to avoid and prevent abortion.
All it takes is removing the barriers to access; education, accessibility, affordability.
If some women are unable to stop themselves from getting pregnant and having abortions they need mandatory controls.
If there are that many women living in the 21st century, in the wealthiest country on earth, who for some reason are deliberately having unprotected sex, and are carelessly or foolishly unaware that they (biology101) might become pregnant,
I am happy for you that you live a life utterly unaware of the trials of being a woman on this planet.
Are you agreeing with me that there ARE huge numbers of women living in the 21st century, in the wealthiest country on earth, who for some reason are deliberately having unprotected sex, and are carelessly or foolishly unaware that they (biology101) might become pregnant?
That poverty, poor parenting, lack of education, and yes, low intelligence are not things that cross your mind as life’s hurdles.
If there are women who are unable to stop themselves from getting pregnant and having abortions then, for their own benefit, they need mandatory controls on their behaviour.
...assuming they don't want to get pregnant and have abortions. (Nobody wants to have an abortion - am I right?)
then prevention is definitely the best option.
It’s always the best option, is it not?
Yes. Assuming you want to end all abortions.
Dont get pregnant. No abortion.
Im assuming the my-body-my-choice dogma is founded on the notion that women understand biology.
If they don't, then there's a strong case for mandatory preventive measures. Measures which are "demonstrably" the best way to prevent abortion.
As stated in previous posts these are demonstrably among the best ways to reduce abortions. Yes?
You need to ask that question to all those modern, independent, educated, women living in apparent ignorance of biology101.
So this is curious. What makes you think that all of these women are modern? Or independent? Or educated? Or ever had access to a college biology course? And additionally financially solvent, or even willing partners?
If they arent able to prevent themselves getting pregnant theres a strong case for mandatory interventions on their behalf and in their own interest.
Serious question. Why are modern, independent, educated women the only women that you consider helping?
I dont think that.
So you'll have to find someone who does if thats an argument youre looking for.
(see pood? THATS how you deal with someone you think might be taking you out of context or not knowing what you're actually trying to say.)
It seems to me that THEY are the ones who aren't aware of this "best way" to prevent abortion.
Astoundingly astute, my friend. Indeed they are not.
Great. We agree.
Thats progress.
You must have read the part of the study that providing sexuality education was a necessary part of the reduction in abortions!
Sure.
If theres uneducated women who aren't aware of how to avoid pregnancy and abortion then theres a strong case for mandatory interventions on their behalf and in their own interest. (But I repeat myself.)
Indeed, you may have noticed it in my list of tools to prevent pregnancy! You are a wizard of observation!
Yep. I read people's posts.
And when they use terms like demonstrably and entirely I don't think they mean something different.
Theres no nuance or context to the plainly obvious fact that if you dont want to have an abortion, you should avoid getting pregnant.
All this 'my-body-my-choice' dogmatic ex cathedra preaching from the church of feminism should be dissected to see if these women actually do know what they are choosing to do.
I feel like you didn’t read the study at all. You should. It’s very relevant and very important in your quest to reduce abortions.
Im not sure what you think I'm missing.
Saying....I dont
feel like you read the study isn't exactly pinpointing where you think I'm not getting the message that there's lots of things women can do to avoid getting pregnant and having an UNWANTED abortion.
Or maybe your understanding of women and the pressures they face is as woefully inadequate and shamefully shallow as you accuse their understanding of biology to be.
I have spent the last few decades being indoctrinated by the received wisdom that women are equal to men and don't need old-fashioned patriarchal care and nurturing. I take it as an article of faith that women DO know how to avoid pregnancy and abortion.
But if there's a case for mandatory interventions to protect women unable to grasp or manage the basics of becoming pregnant, I'm open-minded.
You think that knowing biology is a substitute for knowing psychiatry, developmental psychology, and anthropology.
I wasn't aware that these were necessary/sufficient requirements to avoid unwanted abortions or that men were the only people who had such an educational advantage in theses fields.
Whether or not sufficient awareness of psychiatry, developmental psychology, anthropology, evolutionary biology, critical gender theory, political science, etc are necessary to avoid getting pregnant might be an interesting discussion but let's just start with women who confuse and conflate the words abortion and contraception.