• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

RussiaGate

That is why the satellite countries were the first to rebel and quickly join with Western Europe and NATO.
Wrong again. Nobody rebelled, Soviet union simply was no longer able to afford them.

Barbos, I give you credit for being better than a совок*, but you are incredibly ignorant, if you know nothing about the rebellions and ethnic oppression that took place during the Soviet period.
You are being dishonest, I was talking about the end of Soviet Union and how SU satellites did not rebel. And no, baltic states were not satellites, they were part of the Soviet Union.
And how Soviet in general had much lower ethnic tension that you are trying to imply.
Every country tends to whitewash its past, but you have access to more of the history of your country than is in Russian history books. Is this the excuse you have been given for why all of the satellite countries, including the Baltic Republics, moved swiftly to join NATO and Western Europe? For why Ukraine would still like to join NATO?
We have been over this a million times. It's economy stupid! They all think that if they join EU/NATO it would get better.
You never heard of the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 or the Czech Velvet Revolution, when demonstrators tore down street signs to confuse invading Soviet tanks and painted swastikas on them? Seriously?
Really? You insist on this description of Czech Velvet Revolution? :)
Well I heard about. But have you heard about the fact that Brezhnev did not want to "invade" Czechoslovakia at all? I bet you did not know that,
It was DDR and Poland who decided that something must be done about Czechoslovakia, not the Soviet UInion.
Speaking of whitewashing the history my ass.
You don't understand why the Orange Revolution happened in Ukraine and Yanukovych fled into Russia?
Yes, I understand, you don't

It's too bad that you have no respect for the social sciences. That may explain the gaps in your knowledge of the history of your own country. You need to educate yourself.
Gaps are all yours as usual.
 
Last edited:
Barbos, I give you credit for being better than a совок*, but you are incredibly ignorant, if you know nothing about the rebellions and ethnic oppression that took place during the Soviet period.
You are being dishonest, I was talking about the end of Soviet Union and how SU satellites did not rebel. And no, baltic states were not satellites, they were part of the Soviet Union.
And how Soviet in general had much lower ethnic tension that you are trying to imply.

I won't accuse you of dishonesty, because I think you are just being willfully ignorant and a bit thick. If you had read more carefully, you would have seen that I never claimed that the Baltic republics were satellite countries. They had been occupied and annexed at the end of WWII, even though the Soviet Union had previously given up all territorial claims on them in earlier treaties. And why would you ever think that I considered the Baltic states to have been satellite countries? Their situation was far more dire.

The point I was making was that there were open rebellions against Soviet dominance since all of those countries were occupied after WWII. It was only with great difficulty that Soviet troops were dislodged from Austria. The Baltic states were forced to absorb large Russian populations, who displaced many in the local labor force.

Every country tends to whitewash its past, but you have access to more of the history of your country than is in Russian history books. Is this the excuse you have been given for why all of the satellite countries, including the Baltic Republics, moved swiftly to join NATO and Western Europe? For why Ukraine would still like to join NATO?
We have been over this a million times. It's economy stupid! They all think that if they join EU/NATO it would get better.

Are you seriously that ignorant that you think it is all just economics? They joined NATO as insurance against a Russian invasion of their territory. Learn some history. Ukraine also wanted to join NATO and the EU, and that was one of the reasons why Putin invaded them, proving to the rest of the countries in that region that they were right to fear Russian aggression. Nobody is denying that those countries also had economic incentives to align with the West. They had suffered terribly from Russian dominance of their countries.

You never heard of the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 or the Czech Velvet Revolution, when demonstrators tore down street signs to confuse invading Soviet tanks and painted swastikas on them? Seriously?
Really? You insist on this description of Czech Velvet Revolution? :)

Sorry, but I misspoke in refering to the 1968 invasion of Czechoslovakia by the Soviet Union as the "Velvet Revolution", which took place in 1989. The Velvet Revolution was two decades later, but it took place while Soviet troops were still based in the country.

Well I heard about. But have you heard about the fact that Brezhnev did not want to "invade" Czechoslovakia at all? I bet you did not know that, It was DDR and Poland who decided that something must be done about Czechoslovakia, not the Soviet UInion.
Speaking of whitewashing the history my ass.

That must be where you pulled your knowledge of the history from. It is true that the "Warsaw Pact" invaded with a multinational force, but there were five times the number of Soviet troops in that force and the entire operation was led by the Soviet high command. The puppet leaders in neighboring satellite countries had a very strong interest in not letting the same thing happen in their countries, so they did lend troops and moral support, but the invasion could only have happened with Brezhnev's approval. Soviet troops were not removed from Czechoslovakia until negotiations with Gorbachev in 1989 led to their evacuation.


You don't understand why the Orange Revolution happened in Ukraine and Yanukovych fled into Russia?
Yes, I understand, you don't

I think not. You don't seem to understand the depth of anger that people in that region still feel over Soviet occupation. Nor do you understand how much they fear a reconstruction of the Soviet empire by Putin, who has already said that he did not consider Ukraine a "real country" and has called the occupied territories in eastern Ukraine "novorossiya".
 
Nice back-pedaling. Again, 1968 Czechoslovakia invasion was on Poland and DDR.
Brezhnev was genuinely fine with Dubchek&Co. it took a lot of work to convince him.

Near the end of Soviet Union collapse it had no means nor desire to hold to Eastern Europe. Once DDR was about to let go it was obvious that they were all free to do anything.There was no rebellions in Eastern Europe.

We have been over NATO shit multiple times, stop repeating fucking propaganda about how these countries are afraid of Russian invasion.
It has always been about economy and how to get into EU and win local elections. Ordinary folk don't care about Russian invasions, you can go and poll people there and confirm that nobody is afraid of Russian invasion.
Ukraine are now openly admitting that EU fucked them with this association crap. Even some of the pro-Poroshenko people admit that.
It's a freaking Greece 2.0 now in Ukraine. and EU/US is to blame for this, not Russia.

You are ignorant. Your confusing velvet revolution with 1968 is evidence of that.
 
Nice back-pedaling. Again, 1968 Czechoslovakia invasion was on Poland and DDR.
Brezhnev was genuinely fine with Dubchek&Co. it took a lot of work to convince him...

Were you even alive in 1968? Brezhnev was looking at a propaganda disaster. His only concern at the time was that it not look what it really was--military domination of the satellite countries by the Soviet Union. He needed armies from his vassal states. His stooges in the vassal states had a common interest in helping him, because they did not want to be replaced by local versions of Dubček. Nor did they want to see Czechoslovakia become a haven for refugees to escape to the West. Brezhnev was so "genuinely fine" with Dubček that he had him made ambassador to Turkey, in the hope that he would defect. When that didn't happen, they booted him from the Communist Party.

I must say, barbos, that you have a remarkable appetite for the revisionist horseshit that they shovel onto your plate.
 
Nice back-pedaling. Again, 1968 Czechoslovakia invasion was on Poland and DDR.
Brezhnev was genuinely fine with Dubchek&Co. it took a lot of work to convince him...

Were you even alive in 1968?
I am glad you know the year now.
Brezhnev was looking at a propaganda disaster.
What does that even mean? Did you try to say "PR disaster"? :)
His only concern at the time was that it not look what it really was--military domination of the satellite countries by the Soviet Union. He needed armies from his vassal states.
Again, no, It was not the issue. Issue were reforms which he disliked/afraid of less strongly than Poland and DDR guys.
His stooges in the vassal states had a common interest in helping him, because they did not want to be replaced by local versions of Dubček. Nor did they want to see Czechoslovakia become a haven for refugees to escape to the West. Brezhnev was so "genuinely fine" with Dubček that he had him made ambassador to Turkey, in the hope that he would defect. When that didn't happen, they booted him from the Communist Party.

I must say, barbos, that you have a remarkable appetite for the revisionist horseshit that they shovel onto your plate.
It's not me, it's you. You "learned" history watching US propaganda and Hollywood movies of the time
Unfortunately (for you) history more nuanced than that and that "history" does need some revision.
 
...It's not me, it's you. You "learned" history watching US propaganda and Hollywood movies of the time
Unfortunately (for you) history more nuanced than that and that "history" does need some revision.

No, I lived through that history and saw pictures that the Czechs themselves took of the invasion as it happened. I talked to refugees who were eyewitnesses or had made it out of Czechoslovakia during the turmoil. A couple of years after that, a Soviet delegation visited Ohio State, my university at the time, and I befriended some of them. They were all Party members, and one woman, who had a PhD in sociology, told me that they had to rotate some troops out of Czechoslovakia because of the state of morale. They really did not take well to being called fascists and Nazis in what was clearly a popular uprising.

Anyway, enjoy your plate of horseshit. Apparently, your country needs to come up with some way to explain why so many former satellite and CIS states preferred to distance themselves from you. I guess that the explanation that you like best is that it's all about money--being bribed away from a benevolent tsardom. It couldn't have anything to do with past Russian aggression. :rolleyes:
 
Why are we even talking about this? Not only Warsaw Pact is long dead but Soviet Union is long dead as well
Why do you act as if EU has 450 million people waiting to invade them?
 
...It's not me, it's you. You "learned" history watching US propaganda and Hollywood movies of the time
Unfortunately (for you) history more nuanced than that and that "history" does need some revision.

No, I lived through that history and saw pictures that the Czechs themselves took of the invasion as it happened. a because of the state of morale. They really did not take well to being called fascists and Nazis in what was clearly a popular uprising.
Great, you must have lived through Pinochet, Central America crap of the 80s, Iraq War as well, Vietnam, right?
Wars in Africa, (they are mostly on Europeans), right?

What is your fucking point?
 
Mueller just spoke. To review... and the below is a translation from protected Prosecutorialese to the Common Tongue:

RUSSIA INTERFERED WITH OUR ELECTION ON MULTIPLE FRONTS!

We didn't say Trump didn't commit a crime! If we felt he didn't commit one, we would have said so.

According to the Constitution, Congress is the venue for dealing with the abuses of power Trump committed.
 
...It's not me, it's you. You "learned" history watching US propaganda and Hollywood movies of the time
Unfortunately (for you) history more nuanced than that and that "history" does need some revision.

No, I lived through that history and saw pictures that the Czechs themselves took of the invasion as it happened. a because of the state of morale. They really did not take well to being called fascists and Nazis in what was clearly a popular uprising.
Great, you must have lived through Pinochet, Central America crap of the 80s, Iraq War as well, Vietnam, right?
Wars in Africa, (they are mostly on Europeans), right?

Actually, no. Unlike you, I'm not trying to rationalize my country's past behavior in Chile or anywhere else. I am just as critical of it as you are.

What is your fucking point?

To argue against positions that you yourself have raised in this thread. Have you forgotten why you brought them up?
 
Why are we even talking about this? Not only Warsaw Pact is long dead but Soviet Union is long dead as well
Why do you act as if EU has 450 million people waiting to invade them?

Russia's actions demonstrate that the bear was simply hibernating. It's waking back up and eating again.
 
Great, you must have lived through Pinochet, Central America crap of the 80s, Iraq War as well, Vietnam, right?
Wars in Africa, (they are mostly on Europeans), right?

Actually, no. Unlike you, I'm not trying to rationalize my country's past behavior in Chile or anywhere else. I am just as critical of it as you are.
Where are the sanctions? Why are not you sanctioning yourself?
Why are not people going to prison for all of that?
The fact is, West and US specifically is in fact more guilty of crap around the world, but since they are the winners they don't get to go to prison, whereas the losers get to pay for the slightest most laughable infractions. This russiagate is laughable, I bet people at CIA are privately laughing. In fact, not very privately. I saw one on TV laughing publicly on Cuomo.
What is your fucking point?

To argue against positions that you yourself have raised in this thread. Have you forgotten why you brought them up?
I will ask again, why are we talking about events of 1968?
Russia as country did not even exist back then.
 
Why are we even talking about this? Not only Warsaw Pact is long dead but Soviet Union is long dead as well
Why do you act as if EU has 450 million people waiting to invade them?

Russia's actions demonstrate that the bear was simply hibernating. It's waking back up and eating again.
Resident neocon automated response unit has activated.
 
Last edited:
SO Trump basically admitted today (on twitter, of course) that he knows Russia helped get him elected.

Does that change anything?

LOL. Of course not, because nothing matters in this fucked up timeline.
 
SO Trump basically admitted today (on twitter, of course) that he knows Russia helped get him elected.
But as long as HE didn't ASK them to, then NO COLLUSION! NO COLLUSION!

But when asked about what we're going to do NEXT time to prevent further interference....?



























**crickets**
 
Seems like the Trumpies' would-be coverups are making the scandal worse. Like in the Watergate scandal, when Richard Nixon and his underlings tried to obstruct investigations of their misdeeds, that made the scandal worse. Likewise for the Catholic Church and its pedophile priests.
 
Why are we even talking about this? Not only Warsaw Pact is long dead but Soviet Union is long dead as well
Why do you act as if EU has 450 million people waiting to invade them?

Russia's actions demonstrate that the bear was simply hibernating. It's waking back up and eating again.
Resident neocon automated response unit has activated.

Mind explaining the three countries you have invaded then?
 
Back
Top Bottom