southernhybrid
Contributor
I know we don't often discuss the Mormons here, but I couldn't resist posting from this recent NYT article about women who are rebelling against wearing their sacred underwear. Sacred underwear is just one of the many nutty things that we find in religion, as most of you know.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/21/us/mormon-women-underclothes.html?searchResultPosition=1
I'd like to applaud this woman for being outspoken about the uncomfortable underwear, and refusing to wear it, but I am also perplexed as to how she can believe in some of the kooky things in Mormonism. Of course, many, all religious mythology has kooky practices and rituals. What is it about humans that they are able to take these things seriously? I've yet to figure it out.
Perhaps we have some former Mormons here who have a clue.
I think anyone interested should be able to read the entire article since the NYT says subscribers can share 10 each month and I'm not there yet.
Wow! Is the underwear supposed to bring them closer to Christ? Who knew?
And, that's one reason why it's hard to take Romney seriously, even when he does the right thing. Of course, we know that he also tied his dog to the roof of his car while traveling once, but I don't think that was related to Mormonism. Hope this post either made some of you laugh or shake your heads and wonder what in the world goes through the minds of people who believe that underwear is sacred. I'm just perplexed. At least,, as an atheist, my underwear isn't giving me a rash or a UTI.
https://www.nytimes.com/2021/07/21/us/mormon-women-underclothes.html?searchResultPosition=1
Sasha Piton was on a hike near her home in Idaho Falls, Idaho, when she realized something was wrong. The trek was just a few miles, and not strenuous, but a rash was spreading along the crease above her thigh.
Ms. Piton quickly identified the cause. Like many members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, she wears a white two-piece set of sacred temple garments, which are functionally underwear, almost all of the time.
After another painful hike, Ms. Piton reluctantly stopped wearing the garments when exercising and occasionally removed them overnight. Both changes felt significant, since church members have historically been encouraged to wear the garments “night and day.” But they were simply too uncomfortable.
And she did not stop there. Last month, Ms. Piton posted several cheerfully direct pleas to Instagram, where she discusses church culture as @themormonhippie. “We really want buttery soft fabric,” she said, addressing her comments to the church’s 96-year-old president, Russell M. Nelson. “My vagina has to breathe.”
I'd like to applaud this woman for being outspoken about the uncomfortable underwear, and refusing to wear it, but I am also perplexed as to how she can believe in some of the kooky things in Mormonism. Of course, many, all religious mythology has kooky practices and rituals. What is it about humans that they are able to take these things seriously? I've yet to figure it out.
Perhaps we have some former Mormons here who have a clue.
Ms. Piton, 33, had tapped into a familiar problem that few women in the church felt bold enough to discuss publicly. Her posts drew thousands of comments and private messages, in which women vented their frustrations with the holy apparel: itchy hems, bunchy seams, pinching waistbands and even chronic yeast infections caused by fabric that does not breathe.
“It’s sacred,” one commenter wrote. “But it’s still actual underwear.”
Temple garments date back to the church’s origins in the 19th century and symbolize the wearer’s commitment to the faith, akin to the religious garments of many other faith traditions. Adult Latter-day Saints wear them after their “temple endowment,” a private membership ritual that typically takes place before missionary service or marriage. The church controls the design and manufacturing process of the garments, and sells them globally at low prices.
I think anyone interested should be able to read the entire article since the NYT says subscribers can share 10 each month and I'm not there yet.
In private Facebook groups for women in the church, she said, garments are a constant topic of discussion, with some women hoping for improvements and others defending the garments as they are. But few women feel comfortable approaching male leaders to discuss bodily fluids, infections and sexual intimacy.
“People are scared to be brutally honest, to say: ‘This isn’t working for me. It isn’t bringing me closer to Christ, it’s giving me U.T.I.s,’” Ms. Perez said.
Open discussion is also thorny because the garments are frequent targets of mockery from outsiders. When Mitt Romney, a church member, was running for president in 2012, he was derided by some mainstream commentators for wearing “magic underwear.”
Wow! Is the underwear supposed to bring them closer to Christ? Who knew?
And, that's one reason why it's hard to take Romney seriously, even when he does the right thing. Of course, we know that he also tied his dog to the roof of his car while traveling once, but I don't think that was related to Mormonism. Hope this post either made some of you laugh or shake your heads and wonder what in the world goes through the minds of people who believe that underwear is sacred. I'm just perplexed. At least,, as an atheist, my underwear isn't giving me a rash or a UTI.