Sessions rescinds guidance safeguarding the right of refugees, asylum seekers to work in the U.S.

[Underseer]

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...gees-asylum-right-to-work-20180703-story.html

1. This is an attack on legal immigrants.
2. Instead of being potential contributors to society and the economy, every asylum seeker was just turned into a burden on the taxpayer.

If conservolibertarians actually believed in any of the arguments they routinely make, they would be screaming bloody murder about this, but we all know that they won't see anything wrong with this, and I'm sure we all have our own guesses as to why.

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

You really don't know the libertarian position in immigration. This is it.

In my opinion, we should allow people to cross the border with a mere ID check. That way we can weed out the criminals, and some of them are indeed criminals. Part of the illegal immigration problem is people cannot risk going back home once harvest season is over. The border process would take mere minutes instead of days, weeks, or even months. Using that simple ID check it should then be possible for those who are here to get a job if they so choose.

People who are not citizens should know that they are here on good behavior though. Any crime (real crimes, not speeding tickets) and once their sentence is finished they go to their home country to never return.

However, just as getting in should be easy, naturalization should be a real chore.

This also makes it easier for those who are brought here as children, who are being used as nothing more than "feel guilty if you don't agree with me" props.

My position is actually in accord with that of the Libertarian Party. So ... are you going to support your claim that the "conservolibertarian" position is something other than what I wrote?