Keith&Co.
Contributor
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2006
- Messages
- 22,444
- Location
- Far Western Mass
- Gender
- Here.
- Basic Beliefs
- I'm here...
To the best of my knowledge, Trump did cancel every unconstitutional order Obama made. Much in the same way I have eliminated the risk of Griffin attacks around Western Sydney.
To the best of my knowledge, Trump did cancel every unconstitutional order Obama made. Much in the same way I have eliminated the risk of Griffin attacks around Western Sydney.
The fact that no Griffin attacks have been reported around Western Sydney does not speak to the elimination of the risk. Don't be like Donald, blowing your claims all out of all proportion to your deeds!
maybe Trumpmnot running a fraudulent charity would have been 'a great start' tofighting corruption?Looks like a great start to fight corruption.
maybe Trumpmnot running a fraudulent charity would have been 'a great start' tofighting corruption?Looks like a great start to fight corruption.
Maybe not lending his name to a university that was nothing but a scam?
Maybe not selling snake oil from the White House Lawn?
Whst is the point of stopping other people from possible corruption when FFvC, himself, is up to his wsttles in actual corruption?
Did i say that? Where did i say that? Or do you just not want to answer the question?maybe Trumpmnot running a fraudulent charity would have been 'a great start' tofighting corruption?Looks like a great start to fight corruption.
Maybe not lending his name to a university that was nothing but a scam?
Maybe not selling snake oil from the White House Lawn?
Whst is the point of stopping other people from possible corruption when FFvC, himself, is up to his wsttles in actual corruption?
So it would've been better if Trump didn't enact this legislation?
Did i say that? Where did i say that? Or do you just not want to answer the question?So it would've been better if Trump didn't enact this legislation?
So, that's a 'no' on answering the question.Did i say that? Where did i say that? Or do you just not want to answer the question?So it would've been better if Trump didn't enact this legislation?
Fine, Keith. He banned officials from lobbying but it's not good enough even though no other President in history has done that. It actually proves Trump is more corrupt.
TDS.
"President Donald Trump acted Saturday to fulfill a key portion of his pledge to "drain the swamp" in Washington, banning administration officials from ever lobbying the U.S. on behalf of a foreign government and imposing a separate five-year ban on other lobbying."
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-sets-5-year-lifetime-lobbying-ban-officials-n713631
Looks like a great start to fight corruption. How can anyone say this is bad?
But loopholes, some of them sizable, abound. At least 33 former Trump officials have found ways around the pledge. The most prominent is former Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke, who resigned in December after a series of ethics investigations. He announced Wednesday that he is joining a lobbying firm, Turnberry Solutions, which was started in 2017 by several former Trump campaign aides.
"President Donald Trump acted Saturday to fulfill a key portion of his pledge to "drain the swamp" in Washington, banning administration officials from ever lobbying the U.S. on behalf of a foreign government and imposing a separate five-year ban on other lobbying."
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-sets-5-year-lifetime-lobbying-ban-officials-n713631
Looks like a great start to fight corruption. How can anyone say this is bad?
"President Donald Trump acted Saturday to fulfill a key portion of his pledge to "drain the swamp" in Washington, banning administration officials from ever lobbying the U.S. on behalf of a foreign government and imposing a separate five-year ban on other lobbying."
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-sets-5-year-lifetime-lobbying-ban-officials-n713631
Looks like a great start to fight corruption. How can anyone say this is bad?
"President Donald Trump acted Saturday to fulfill a key portion of his pledge to "drain the swamp" in Washington, banning administration officials from ever lobbying the U.S. on behalf of a foreign government and imposing a separate five-year ban on other lobbying."
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/trump-sets-5-year-lifetime-lobbying-ban-officials-n713631
Looks like a great start to fight corruption. How can anyone say this is bad?
maybe Trumpmnot running a fraudulent charity would have been 'a great start' tofighting corruption?Looks like a great start to fight corruption.
Maybe not lending his name to a university that was nothing but a scam?
Maybe not selling snake oil from the White House Lawn?
Whst is the point of stopping other people from possible corruption when FFvC, himself, is up to his wsttles in actual corruption?
So it would've been better if Trump didn't enact this legislation?