Is he any worse than 911 Truther, LA rioter and cop killer apologist Van Jones?
9/11 "truther" accusation and exoneration
Jones came under additional criticism for his name appearing on a 2004 petition from 911Truth.org that suggested the Bush Administration "may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen".[45][54] This accusation was particularly controversial, prompting conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer to declare that while other accusations against Jones were "trivial" this was "beyond partisanship."[55]
Jones immediately issued a statement saying, "I do not agree with this statement and it certainly does not reflect my views now or ever"[45][54] and later clarified that he had never signed the 911Truth petition.[56]
On July 27, 2010, the group 911truth.org released a statement confirming that they had "researched the situation and were unable to produce electronic or written evidence that Van agreed to sign the Statement"
He was one of Obama's czars before being forced tor resigned hat position and found a home at CNN.Yes. But he might be better than say, David Duke.
Why do you ask? Jones was not appointed to anything IFAIK.
9/11 "truther" accusation and exoneration
Jones came under additional criticism for his name appearing on a 2004 petition from 911Truth.org that suggested the Bush Administration "may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen".[45][54] This accusation was particularly controversial, prompting conservative columnist Charles Krauthammer to declare that while other accusations against Jones were "trivial" this was "beyond partisanship."[55]
Jones immediately issued a statement saying, "I do not agree with this statement and it certainly does not reflect my views now or ever"[45][54] and later clarified that he had never signed the 911Truth petition.[56]
On July 27, 2010, the group 911truth.org released a statement confirming that they had "researched the situation and were unable to produce electronic or written evidence that Van agreed to sign the Statement"
Is Bannon supporting any convicted murderers?SF Gate said:Supporters of Mumia Abu-Jamal, a death row inmate convicted for the 1981 shooting death of a Philadelphia police officer, said the protest was called after the Supreme Court on Monday rejected claims that Abu-Jamal, a former radio journalist and Black Panther, did not receive a fair trial."We knew there was another event going on, but the timing of the court decision is what dictated when the protest was held," said Van Jones, a San Francisco civil rights lawyer who helped coordinate the protest march.
Jones said about 15 protesters occupied the rotunda at the Federal Building on Clay Street in an act of civil disobedience with the hope they would be arrested.
Is Bannon supporting any convicted murderers?
The racist demonization of Van Jones is amusing.
One shows oneself to be a mindless tool by doing it.
I don't know Bannon. If he is a racist and antisemite he should not have been appointed by Trump. But then again, neither should Jones have been appointed by Obama. Every administration has its share of radicals I would say, which is the point of me bringing up Jones.Would you think he was a bad choice if he was a convicted murderer? Somehow I don't think so.
Is Jones a convicted murderer? Do you deny that Bannon is a racist and anti-semite? ... just trying to get a feel for the depth of the sand into which you have buried your head.
It's not diverting attention, it's putting it in perspective.ANYTHING to divert attention from the ascent of overt racists to top positions in our new alt-right regime.
It is Jones who is racist. I mean, common, "whitelash"? Was Obama's election "blacklash"?The racist demonization of Van Jones is amusing.
I don't know Bannon.
....
It's not diverting attention, it's putting it in perspective.
It is Jones who is racist. I mean, common, "whitelash"? Was Obama's election "blacklash"?The racist demonization of Van Jones is amusing.
I don't know Bannon. If he is a racist and antisemite he should not have been appointed by Trump. But then again, neither should Jones have been appointed by Obama. Every administration has its share of radicals I would say, which is the point of me bringing up Jones.
- - - Updated - - -
It's not diverting attention, it's putting it in perspective.ANYTHING to divert attention from the ascent of overt racists to top positions in our new alt-right regime.
It is Jones who is racist. I mean, common, "whitelash"? Was Obama's election "blacklash"?
Jone is an intellectual, extremely articulate and reasonable.
Your racist nonsense is laughable.
What does any of that have to do with his race?
What does any of that have to do with his race?
Absolutely great question. Tremendous question - the best question ever.
But Bannon is still a racist. And now he's cheeto-face's chief strategist.
You don't know Bannon...hum... So do you normally and regularly pull information from websites that you have no clue about? It would appear that you seem to be a regular reader of Breitbart, at least from what you post.I don't know Bannon. If he is a racist and antisemite he should not have been appointed by Trump.
I know it's Breitbart, but if this pans out it would mean DuBose was back to his drug dealing ways and it's going to change the dynamic of the case.
Report: Sam DuBose, Shot by Cop, Had Two Pounds of Marijuana and Thousands in Cash in His Car
If that were the case, you'd have also noted that Bannon's role is much more expansive than Jones' was. You are only fooling yourself with these Tu quoque fallacies.It's not diverting attention, it's putting it in perspective.
Absolutely great question. Tremendous question - the best question ever.
But Bannon is still a racist. And now he's cheeto-face's chief strategist.
Yeah but the fact that Steve-o is a racist is irrelevant because Van Jones and also there was this one angry Black lady at a Black Lives Matter protest. Hang on while I go find a picture of angry Black women to change the subject.