• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Sutherland Springs - Why didn't victims defend themselves?

Jimmy Higgins

Contributor
Joined
Jan 31, 2001
Messages
50,476
Basic Beliefs
Calvinistic Atheist
I think we really need to ask ourselves this question. Why didn't the shooting victims defend themselves? It was just one shooter and there were dozens of them.

article said:
"Everybody got down, crawling under wherever they could hide. He was shooting hard."Solis dropped to the ground but was struck in the left arm. "I could feel the gunshots. I saw them on the carpet," she said. "I could see the gunshots coming down."


Brown said his mother recalled the gunman walking up and down the aisles several times.


"She stayed on the ground the whole time -- never saw him, just saw his boots as he walked around the church," Brown said.

Instead of acting, they cowered, waiting for Big Government to come in and save them. It makes me wonder why there was this unnatural instinct to wait for help.

You might be wondering where in the heck I'm coming from.

article said:
“Eight of his church members who might be alive if he had expressly allowed members to carry handguns in church are dead,” Cotton declared. “Innocent people died because of his position on a political issue."

Derec said:
It might get dismissed as insensitive but I think it's a fair question: why didn't they overpower him while he was reloading?
These statements weren't isolated with the Dylan Roof massacre, which happened in a church... where the church welcome the kid, a complete stranger, into their study.

So to be fair, should we be asking why didn't the white church goers do anything to help themselves?
 
Who knows how any of us would react in this situation. Mothers were laying on top of their children to protect them. There were lots of children and babies there. They may have been helping the wounded. It's always hard to speculate after the fact. People died.
 
Running toward gunfire is not a natural reaction. It's natural to either shield oneself, or try to shield someone else.

It only takes about a second to snap in a fresh magazine on an AR15. Rushing him while reloading is not realistic.

It probably was not possible to get behind the shooter, or time to organize a mob to rush him. The most one could expect might be to throw hymnals at the shooter. A direct hit to the side of the head would disorient him for a moment, but any change in the outcome is doubtful.
 
It only takes about a second to snap in a fresh magazine on an AR15. Rushing him while reloading is not realistic.

It probably was not possible to get behind the shooter, or time to organize a mob to rush him. The most one could expect might be to throw hymnals at the shooter. A direct hit to the side of the head would disorient him for a moment, but any change in the outcome is doubtful.

If you're nearby and he's reloading your best bet is to jump him and grab the gun, while shouting for help. Rifles are bad in close quarters because of this.
 
It only takes about a second to snap in a fresh magazine on an AR15. Rushing him while reloading is not realistic.

It probably was not possible to get behind the shooter, or time to organize a mob to rush him. The most one could expect might be to throw hymnals at the shooter. A direct hit to the side of the head would disorient him for a moment, but any change in the outcome is doubtful.

If you're nearby and he's reloading your best bet is to jump him and grab the gun, while shouting for help. Rifles are bad in close quarters because of this.
Yeah, that was why he only managed to murder half in attendance and shot just about everyone else.
 
If you're nearby and he's reloading your best bet is to jump him and grab the gun, while shouting for help. Rifles are bad in close quarters because of this.
Yeah, that was why he only managed to murder half in attendance and shot just about everyone else.

Just because the best course of action is to jump him while he's reloading that doesn't mean anyone did.
 
Yeah, that was why he only managed to murder half in attendance and shot just about everyone else.

Just because the best course of action is to jump him while he's reloading that doesn't mean anyone did.
The question is, why was this question asked when a black church bible study was massacred, but not when even more white people in a church were massacred?
 
Back
Top Bottom