The case for invading the USA to effect regime change

[Jolly_Penguin]

Look, the Americans keep fighting among themselves. This invasion will be even easier than we thought.

 

[southernhybrid]

Look, the Americans keep fighting among themselves. This invasion will be even easier than we thought.

Maybe, but don't forget that we do have a lot of far right militias here and they are armed to the teeth. On the other hand, you might be able to recruit some of the gun toting liberals in the south to join you.

 

[ronburgundy]

Ah, so you're a traitor.

You didn't read it, did you?

He said that they would be 'greeted as liberators'.

After all, it would merely be the application of United States' own 'Monroe Doctrine'.

ROFLMAOAY

Ah, ye a traitor, too.

Yes, in the same way that George Washington and all the patriots who fought in the American Revolution were "traitors".

 

[Trausti]

Ah, ye a traitor, too.

Yes, in the same way that George Washington and all the patriots who fought in the American Revolution were "traitors".

Good grief. I guess those who didn’t oppose Obama were also traiters; or do you have a handy double standard to play? Get help people. This forum is like a bunch of screaming heroin addicts at a Seattle park.

 

[whollygoats]

Ah, ye a traitor, too.

Yes, in the same way that George Washington and all the patriots who fought in the American Revolution were "traitors".

Good grief. I guess those who didn’t oppose Obama were also traiters; or do you have a handy double standard to play? Get help people. This forum is like a bunch of screaming heroin addicts at a Seattle park.

You do know that nobody has shackled you here. You are obviously out of place. And, you are fucking brain damaged.

Rather than sit here and intellectually masturbate in your obvious ignorant frustration, why don't you move on?

 

[Tom Sawyer]

Look, the Americans keep fighting among themselves. This invasion will be even easier than we thought.

Maybe, but don't forget that we do have a lot of far right militias here and they are armed to the teeth. On the other hand, you might be able to recruit some of the gun toting liberals in the south to join you.

What would be really useful is if you could have a bunch of jack-booted thugs from the government steal everybody's guns. Then give the guns to us because we don't actually have all that many guns.

This would allow us to update our current invasion plan of charging fortified militia compounds with hockey sticks and lacrosse racquets and hoping that everyone's so surprised at seeing a bunch of Canadians running towards them that they get confused and forget to fire. That's still a good strategy which will probably work, but if we can set things up that we're actually just gunning down a bunch of unarmed civilians, the invasion won't end up cutting so much into our sitting around time.

 

[ZiprHead]

Look, the Americans keep fighting among themselves. This invasion will be even easier than we thought.

Maybe, but don't forget that we do have a lot of far right militias here and they are armed to the teeth. On the other hand, you might be able to recruit some of the gun toting liberals in the south to join you.

Don't forget us gun-toting northern liberals.

 

[ronburgundy]

Ah, ye a traitor, too.

Yes, in the same way that George Washington and all the patriots who fought in the American Revolution were "traitors".

Good grief. I guess those who didn’t oppose Obama were also traiters; or do you have a handy double standard to play? Get help people. This forum is like a bunch of screaming heroin addicts at a Seattle park.

You are the only one playing a double standard by denying that your accusation of "traitor" equally applies to the American revolutionaries who helped to overthrow the government that ruled their society in favor of something better. That's because like all authoritarians, you lack ethical principles and only attack actions as "traitorous" when they are actions against your preferred authorities.

I don't bother attacking anyone as "traitorous" because its a concept that only sheep-minded authoritarians appeal to.

I attack actions as being unethical and praise actions as being ethical, which depending upon the situation and the nature of the ruling government can be either "traitorous" or not.

 

[jonatha]

Look, the Americans keep fighting among themselves. This invasion will be even easier than we thought.

Maybe, but don't forget that we do have a lot of far right militias here and they are armed to the teeth. On the other hand, you might be able to recruit some of the gun toting liberals in the south to join you.

None of them has anything that would be of any threat to two ground attack aircraft

- - - Updated - - -

Look, the Americans keep fighting among themselves. This invasion will be even easier than we thought.

Maybe, but don't forget that we do have a lot of far right militias here and they are armed to the teeth. On the other hand, you might be able to recruit some of the gun toting liberals in the south to join you.

What would be really useful is if you could have a bunch of jack-booted thugs from the government steal everybody's guns. Then give the guns to us because we don't actually have all that many guns.

This would allow us to update our current invasion plan of charging fortified militia compounds with hockey sticks and lacrosse racquets and hoping that everyone's so surprised at seeing a bunch of Canadians running towards them that they get confused and forget to fire. That's still a good strategy which will probably work, but if we can set things up that we're actually just gunning down a bunch of unarmed civilians, the invasion won't end up cutting so much into our sitting around time.

I think dropping poutine on them would be a superior strategy.

Of course, it's probably against the Geneva Convention....

 

[whollygoats]

None of them has anything that would be of any threat to two ground attack aircraft

- - - Updated - - -

Look, the Americans keep fighting among themselves. This invasion will be even easier than we thought.

Maybe, but don't forget that we do have a lot of far right militias here and they are armed to the teeth. On the other hand, you might be able to recruit some of the gun toting liberals in the south to join you.

What would be really useful is if you could have a bunch of jack-booted thugs from the government steal everybody's guns. Then give the guns to us because we don't actually have all that many guns.

This would allow us to update our current invasion plan of charging fortified militia compounds with hockey sticks and lacrosse racquets and hoping that everyone's so surprised at seeing a bunch of Canadians running towards them that they get confused and forget to fire. That's still a good strategy which will probably work, but if we can set things up that we're actually just gunning down a bunch of unarmed civilians, the invasion won't end up cutting so much into our sitting around time.

I think dropping poutine on them would be a superior strategy.

Of course, it's probably against the Geneva Convention....

Yes, I would think it a violation of the culinary protocols.

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

You can tell its a Canadian army, because they will shoot you and them apologize and offer first aid.

 

[Opoponax]

The Canadian-ization of America.

I read the article and it makes me sad that such a thing will never happen. It also makes me sad that the country (the U.S.) is in such a state that I wish it were possible.

 

[Jarhyn]

The Canadian-ization of America.

I read the article and it makes me sad that such a thing will never happen. It also makes me sad that the country (the U.S.) is in such a state that I wish it were possible.

Well, for what it's worth, if (when?) The US collapses under it's own weight of worjer exploitation and failed economic/international policy, I'll gladly support a Canadian expansion southward.

 

[Tom Sawyer]

We could take over the Dakotas and nobody would really notice or care.

Of course, we’d merge them into a single Dakota because it’s pretty dumb that there’s two.

 

[Jarhyn]

We could take over the Dakotas and nobody would really notice or care.

Of course, we’d merge them into a single Dakota because it’s pretty dumb that there’s two.

I'd be down. Just let me know BEFORE annexation, so that I can slide over there from Minnesota and avoid having to actually immigrate

 

[untermensche]

The US has been a destructive menace since WWII.

The damage it did in Vietnam and Cambodia was unimaginable.

For nothing.

The damage it has done in Chile and Haiti and Guatemala was criminal.

The damage it has recently caused with it's terrorist attack of the Iraqi people that directly led to the empowerment of ISIS is unimaginable. We are still dealing with the blowback and consequences of that insane crime.

For nothing but to make a few assholes very rich.

Americans seem to have a blindness to the incredible damage the US has done over the past decades and still is doing.

I suppose that is true of every nation.

The people in it are the last to recognize the crimes being carried out in their name.

 

[Jolly_Penguin]

The US has been a destructive menace since WWII.

The damage it did in Vietnam and Cambodia was unimaginable.

For nothing.

The damage it has done in Chile and Haiti and Guatemala was criminal.

The damage it has recently caused with it's terrorist attack of the Iraqi people that directly led to the empowerment of ISIS is unimaginable. We are still dealing with the blowback and consequences of that insane crime.

For nothing but to make a few assholes very rich.

Americans seem to have a blindness to the incredible damage the US has done over the past decades and still is doing.

I suppose that is true of every nation.

The people in it are the last to recognize the crimes being carried out in their name.

Unter, you didn't say if you support your new Canadian overlords or not eh.

 

[whollygoats]

We could take over the Dakotas and nobody would really notice or care.

Of course, we’d merge them into a single Dakota because it’s pretty dumb that there’s two.

If the Dakotas seceded from the Union, they'd most likely be the third largest nuclear weapons power on the planet. There are a shipload of large siloes in the ground with MIRV-tipped ICBMs snugly nestled in them all over the Dakotas.

 

[Worldtraveller]

Look, the Americans keep fighting among themselves. This invasion will be even easier than we thought.

Maybe, but don't forget that we do have a lot of far right militias here and they are armed to the teeth.

Yes, they're armed, but have you seen them? They will suffer 50% casualties in 'friendly fire' incidents the first time someone says 'boo' within 100 yards of them. The rest will surrender when they realize they won't be home in time to watch Hannity fellate the orange cheetoh and have their shitty TV dinners.

 

[Worldtraveller]

Look, the Americans keep fighting among themselves. This invasion will be even easier than we thought.

Maybe, but don't forget that we do have a lot of far right militias here and they are armed to the teeth. On the other hand, you might be able to recruit some of the gun toting liberals in the south to join you.

What would be really useful is if you could have a bunch of jack-booted thugs from the government steal everybody's guns. Then give the guns to us because we don't actually have all that many guns.

This would allow us to update our current invasion plan of charging fortified militia compounds with hockey sticks and lacrosse racquets and hoping that everyone's so surprised at seeing a bunch of Canadians running towards them that they get confused and forget to fire. That's still a good strategy which will probably work, but if we can set things up that we're actually just gunning down a bunch of unarmed civilians, the invasion won't end up cutting so much into our sitting around time.

It's a little out of date, but the statistics cited in Bowling for Columbine had Canucks with a higher per capita gun (rifle) ownership than the US. Of course, we probably have more assault weapons, and less practical hunting rifles.