The dangers of exaggerating the evils of Islam

[Angry Floof]

Here you go, Syed.

Atheism for Muslims: A Guide to Questioning Islam, Religion, and God for a better future

It's free if you have a Kindle.

 

[Syed]

because its makes sense, because religions civilized human

But you're using empirical evidence to make that deduction. That's what "empirical evidence" means.

so you agreed religions civilized human?

 

[Keith&Co.]

But you're using empirical evidence to make that deduction. That's what "empirical evidence" means.

so you agreed religions civilized human?

So, whether he agrees with your conclusions or not, YOU agree that you're using empirical evidence to reach them.

(There's a difference between 'empirical' and 'irrefutable')

 

[DrZoidberg]

But you're using empirical evidence to make that deduction. That's what "empirical evidence" means.

so you agreed religions civilized human?

Ha ha. I said nothing of the sort.

I'm pointing out the absurdity of you first dismissing empirical evidence and then you proceed to use empirical evidence to argue your case.

You highlight a common problem among religious thinkers today. Science and the scientific method has taken over completely. It's been proven so effective that we only use scientific language today. We've forgotten how pre-scientific debates and arguments were conducted. If you would start using pre-scientific language few would understand you.

Creationists today use scientific language to argue their case. And try providing empirical evidence in support of their religious ideas.

Syed, if you use scientific language, why not just accept that science won?