If (since) God knows the greater good that will result from an event, any uneducated claim about the immorality of His actions is purely subjective.
It would be like an ignorant bystander watching a surgeon amputate a gangrenous limb and accusing the surgeon of torture.
Well, let's just take your little sound bite analogy a little bit further. After the bystander questions the surgeon, the surgeon will explain the purpose behind his action, and can back up his medical judgement with loads of studies, published and peer reviewed. Try that with your God. No explanation. None. No way to check or verify God's purposes. And therefore, no way to verify if God is moral or good or not.
I dont accept your (brute) claim that there are no bystanders aware of what the surgeon is doing.
Atheist bystanders are free to accuse the surgeon of being evil or claim that He isnt even an actual doctor. But you're not free to tell every other bystander that
they dont know anything about the surgeon.
In this thread DBT is running his same old worn-out canard that evil is a
'thing' created by God rather than an
adjective used to describe the ontological opposite (or absence) of GOOD/GOD