untermensche
Contributor
No sir. You speak of process, events in time. The two tied at the hip.
Like Heraclitus argued for perpetual change is almost exactly your position.
So not only can I read I can come up with others who laid out these positions. What you fail to do is to understand that improperly joined through an invention of an imaginary unnecessary thing that supports process. What we call cause and effect may be no more than nows which is just as consistent with QM where there is order but no time. In that scenario it is clearly possible there are many worlds, universerses, sharing in producing the illusion of time. What you try to do is to so constrain explanation as to force it to a single untenable construction. In the timeless world, from a time perspective process and completion is not meaningful. Perhaps there is another dimension or seven we need take into account to explain what appears to be beginning and ending.
You are waving your arms and jumping up and down.
It's a spectacle and amusing but it isn't an argument.
Infinite events are not an amount of events that can complete.
Period. End of story.