• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

The James Webb Space Telescope

For updates, check on NASA Webb Telescope (@NASAWebb) / Twitter and also NASA (@NASA) / Twitter

Live Coverage of the James Webb Space Telescope Mission | NASA also has some updates.
Solar Array Deployed

At approximately 30 minutes after launch, Webb’s solar array began to open up. It is now fully deployed and we have confirmed that the spacecraft is power positive

Webb Is On Its Way!

The James Webb Space Telescope is safely in space, powered on and communicating with ground controllers. Webb continues in coast phase, and is now oriented correctly with respect to the Sun. The six reaction wheels of the spacecraft’s attitude control system have been powered on, and they are now responsible for keeping the spacecraft pointing …
 
That was a launch profile I've never seen before. It looks to me like what happens when your Kerbal's upper stage doesn't have enough thrust.
 
Evidently my company contributed.
Also, we have a James Webb employed at GD.
He is no longer amused by people asking if he's on the JWST project...
 
Some optical trivia.

Put a very bright circle far away from the scope. As the diameter is reduced the image of the object in the focal plane will reach a minimum size as the object source decrease. I call that the blur spot of a system.

Put a plate out a ways with evenly spaced square holes and spaces. Put a bright light behind it. At low spatial frequencies a sharp square wave will appear in the focal plane. Increase the spatial frequency and resolution will go down going to a ine wave analogous to a low pass electrical filter. The Modulation Transfer Function in units of line pairs per millimeter. All the general principles of frequency and time from electrical systems apply to optics. The math is the same.

Plot a buch of rays from infinity in the focal pln, the Point Spread Function. Take the Fourier Transform of the Point Sperad Function amd yu get a contrast ration vs spatial frequency.




The resolution of an optical imaging system – a microscope, telescope, or camera – can be limited by factors such as imperfections in the lenses or misalignment. However, there is a principal limit to the resolution of any optical system, due to the physics of diffraction. An optical system with resolution performance at the instrument's theoretical limit is said to be diffraction-limited.[1]

The diffraction-limited angular resolution of a telescopic instrument is proportional to the wavelength of the light being observed, and inversely proportional to the diameter of its objective's entrance aperture. For telescopes with circular apertures, the size of the smallest feature in an image that is diffraction limited is the size of the Airy disk. As one decreases the size of the aperture of a telescopic lens, diffraction proportionately increases. At small apertures, such as f/22, most modern lenses are limited only by diffraction and not by aberrations or other imperfections in the construction.

For microscopic instruments, the diffraction-limited spatial resolution is proportional to the light wavelength, and to the numerical aperture of either the objective or the object illumination source, whichever is smaller.

In astronomy, a diffraction-limited observation is one that achieves the resolution of a theoretically ideal objective in the size of instrument used. However, most observations from Earth are seeing-limited due to atmospheric effects. Optical telescopes on the Earth work at a much lower resolution than the diffraction limit because of the distortion introduced by the passage of light through several kilometres of turbulent atmosphere. Advanced observatories have started using adaptive optics technology, resulting in greater image resolution for faint targets, but it is still difficult to reach the diffraction limit using adaptive optics.

Radio telescopes are frequently diffraction-limited, because the wavelengths they use (from millimeters to meters) are so long that the atmospheric distortion is negligible. Space-based telescopes (such as Hubble, or a number of non-optical telescopes) always work at their diffraction limit, if their design is free of optical aberration.

The beam from a laser with near-ideal beam propagation properties may be described as being diffraction-limited. A diffraction-limited laser beam, passed through diffraction-limited optics, will remain diffraction-limited, and will have a spatial or angular extent essentially equal to the resolution of the optics at the wavelength of the laser.


 
(1) NASA Webb Telescope on Twitter: "Success! #NASAWebb’s first mid-course correction burn helped fine-tune Webb's trajectory toward its orbit around the second Lagrange point, a million miles (1.5 million km) from Earth: (link) #UnfoldTheUniverse (pic link)" / Twitter
noting
The First Mid-Course Correction Burn – James Webb Space Telescope
After launch, Webb needs to make its own mid-course thrust correction maneuvers to get to its orbit. This is by design: Webb received an intentional slight under-burn from the Ariane-5 that launched it into space, because it’s not possible to correct for overthrust. If Webb gets too much thrust, it can’t turn around to move back toward Earth because that would directly expose its telescope optics and structure to the Sun, overheating them and aborting the science mission before it can even begin.

Therefore, we ease up to the correct velocity in three stages, being careful never to deliver too much thrust — there will be three mid-course correction maneuvers in total.
Both the solar-array deployment and this maneuver were time-critical, but no later ones will be.

From the JWST Blog: James Webb Space Telescope
 
NASA Webb Telescope on Twitter: "📞 Hello Webb? It's us, Earth!

Our team just deployed the gimbaled antenna assembly, which includes Webb’s high-data-rate dish antenna. This antenna will be used to send at least 28.6 Gbytes of data down from the observatory, twice a day: (links)" / Twitter

noting
Webb Antenna Released and Tested – James Webb Space Telescope
Shortly after 10 am EST on Dec. 26, the Webb team began the process of releasing the gimbaled antenna assembly, or GAA, which includes Webb’s high-data-rate dish antenna. This antenna will be used to send at least 28.6 Gbytes of science data down from the observatory, twice a day. The team has now released and tested the motion of the antenna assembly — the entire process took about one hour.

Separately, overnight, the temperature sensors and strain gauges on the telescope were activated for the first time.
 
Maybe we will see a big sign near a solar system that says 'Mind yiur own busness...keep out trespassers will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law'.
 
I saw that the telescope would have the precision to detect a bumble bee on the surface of the Moon. This scope has so much potential.
That would have to be 60 meters in size bumble bee to resolve it on the moon.
And insects are cold-blooded, very little emission especially considering moon surface.
 
More Than You Wanted to Know About Webb’s Mid-Course Corrections! – James Webb Space Telescope - goes into a lot of detail
The largest and most important mid-course correction (MCC), designated MCC-1a, has already been successfully executed as planned, beginning 12.5 hours after launch. This time was chosen because the earlier the course correction is made, the less propellant it requires. This leaves as much remaining fuel as possible for Webb’s ordinary operations over its lifetime: station-keeping (small adjustments to keep Webb in its desired orbit) and momentum unloading (to counteract the effects of solar radiation pressure on the huge sunshield).

The burn wasn’t scheduled immediately after launch to give time for the flight dynamics team to receive tracking data from three ground stations, widely separated over the surface of the Earth, thus providing high accuracy for their determination of Webb’s position and velocity, necessary to determine the precise parameters for the correction burn. Ground stations in Malindi Kenya, Canberra Australia, and Madrid Spain provided the necessary ranging data. There was also time to do a test firing of the required thruster before executing the actual burn. We are currently doing the analysis to determine just how much more correction of Webb’s trajectory will be needed, and how much fuel will be left, but we already know that the Ariane 5’s placement of Webb was better than requirements.

NASA Webb Telescope on Twitter: "Ooh, sick burn! 🔥 ..." / Twitter

[url=https://webb.nasa.gov/content/webbLaunch/whereIsWebb.html]Where Is Webb? NASA/Webb
-- It is now 393,000 km away from the Earth, a little bit farther than the Moon.
 
The Canberra tracking station isn't really in Canberra; Its quite close by as the crow flies, but to shield it from radio noise from the city, it's tucked in behind the Bullen Range, which forms a natural barrier running roughly North/South between the CSIRO facility and Canberra's outer suburbs.
 
More Details on Webb’s Launch – James Webb Space Telescope

The JWST's booster rocket was an Ariane 5. That rocket has two liquid-fueled stages and two strap-on solid rocket boosters. Both liquid-fueled stages use H2 and O2, and both solids use ammonium perchlorate (NH4ClO4), aluminum (Al), and hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene ((C2H3)x).
  • Main engine ignited: - 7s
  • Solids ignited: 0s
  • Vertical to tilted: + 13s
  • Solids jettisoned: + 2m 14s
  • Fairing jettisoned: + 3m 19s
  • Main engine cutoff: + 8m 35s
  • Upper engine ignition: 10s later
  • Upper engine cutoff: 16m later
Main before solids ought to be familiar to anyone who has watched a Space-Shuttle launch.

After engine shut-down, the upper stage underwent a number of positioning maneuvers with its attitude control system in order to separate Webb at the required attitude.

After separation, the upper stage underwent a delicate series of contamination and collision avoidance maneuvers, making sure that its thruster plumes did not impinge on Webb and its precious optics.

Finally, an end-of-life maneuver was performed to avoid potential long term collision risks with Webb.
 
Webb’s Second Mid-Course Correction Burn – James Webb Space Telescope

"At 7:20 pm EST – 60 hours after liftoff — Webb’s second mid-course correction burn began. It lasted 9 minutes and 27 seconds and is now complete."

The first one was on 7:50 pm EST Dec 25 —12h 3m after liftoff — and lasted 65 minutes.

NASA Webb Telescope on Twitter: "Burn, baby, burn! No, we didn't have a disco inferno — we just completed our second mid-course correction burn as we continue to fine-tune #NASAWebb's trajectory to Lagrange point 2. This burn is one of three planned course corrections: (link) #UnfoldTheUniverse (pic link)" / Twitter

The JWST team acknowledged passing the Moon's orbit distance:

NASA Webb Telescope on Twitter: "It’s been a busy evening! Not only did we just complete our second burn, but #NASAWebb also passed the altitude of the Moon as it keeps cruising on to the second Lagrange point to #UnfoldTheUniverse. Bye, @NASAMoon! 👋 🌑 (pic link)" / Twitter

NASA Moon on Twitter: "We thought we felt a breeze!
Kidding, of course, but good luck on the rest of your journey to L2, @NASAWebb! 👋🌌
Where is Webb? (link)" / Twitter


NASA Webb Telescope on Twitter: "Thanks, @NASAMoon! We’ll be sure to send you and all the wonderful folks on @NASAEarth a postcard when we reach our destination.
✉️ Be sure to write back! (link)" / Twitter




Also this cutesy invitation:

NASA Webb Telescope on Twitter: "About six months from now, the Webb telescope will send back its first science images. What do you think we'll see when we #UnfoldTheUniverse? Here's what you showed us! 🎨 Keep sharing your art by tagging #UnfoldTheUniverse: (links)" / Twitter
noting
#unfoldTheUniverse JWST-Art Webb/NASA
 
I saw that the telescope would have the precision to detect a bumble bee on the surface of the Moon. This scope has so much potential.
That would have to be 60 meters in size bumble bee to resolve it on the moon.
And insects are cold-blooded, very little emission especially considering moon surface.
The Webb is all about infra red. It will see the heat from the bee but am not sure that it will resolve the bee itself. I doubt it. Maybe if it stared for a week.
 
I saw that the telescope would have the precision to detect a bumble bee on the surface of the Moon. This scope has so much potential.
That would have to be 60 meters in size bumble bee to resolve it on the moon.
And insects are cold-blooded, very little emission especially considering moon surface.
The Webb is all about infra red. It will see the heat from the bee but am not sure that it will resolve the bee itself. I doubt it. Maybe if it stared for a week.
That's what I wrote. and bee is an insect.
Better analogy would be a mouse on a moon and I doubt it will see it.
Moon is 380,000 km away. Webb is 6000 mm in diameter.
It's equivalent to 6mm optics 380km away.
 
Last edited:
OK, I estimated signal from a 2cm in size mouse on the Moon.
It will be in the order 200-300 infrared (T ~36C) photons per second.
It's doable only if that mouse is in space, not on the surface of the Moon.
 
OK, I estimated signal from a 2cm in size mouse on the Moon.
It will be in the order 200-300 infrared (T ~36C) photons per second.
It's doable only if that mouse is in space, not on the surface of the Moon.
As I recall from the 1963 documentary, the mouse on the moon wasn't an actual mouse, but rather the Aeronautics branch of the government of the Duchy of Grand Fenwick.
 
 
NASA Says Webb’s Excess Fuel Likely to Extend its Lifetime Expectations – James Webb Space Telescope
Expecting JWST to be operational for more than 10 years - their expected minimum is 5 years.
The extra propellant is largely due to the precision of the Arianespace Ariane 5 launch, which exceeded the requirements needed to put Webb on the right path, as well as the precision of the first mid-course correction maneuver – a relatively small, 65-minute burn after launch that added approximately 45 mph (20 meters/sec) to the observatory’s speed. A second correction maneuver occurred on Dec. 27, adding around 6.3 mph (2.8 meters/sec) to the speed.
This also helped in deploying the solar-panel array. The JWST's control software was programmed to deploy it either when the spacecraft was in a good orientation relative to the Sun, or else 33 minutes after launch. It deployed about 1.5 minutes after separation, about 29 minutes after launch -- 4 minutes before that built-in deadline.

Very unusually, that array was a single one instead of two -- what most spacecraft have when they have outward-extending solar arrays on opposite sides of their spacecraft bodies.

NASA Webb Telescope on Twitter: "Due to the precision of our launch ..." / Twitter
Due to the precision of our launch and our first two mid-course corrections, our team has determined that Webb should have enough fuel to allow support of science operations for significantly more than a 10-year science lifetime! 💫

Many of you have asked us about the timing of our solar array deployment. That deployment was executed automatically after rocket separation, based on a stored command to deploy either when Webb reached a certain attitude toward the Sun or automatically at 33 min. after launch.

Because Webb was already in the correct attitude, the array deployed about 1.5 min after separation, or 29 min. after launch.

The rest of our deployments are human-controlled, so deployment timing or order may change! Explore what’s next: Deployment Explorer Webb/NASA
 
Back
Top Bottom