• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

The NFL Fumbles the Ball

AthenaAwakened

Contributor
Joined
Sep 17, 2003
Messages
5,338
Location
Right behind you so ... BOO!
Basic Beliefs
non-theist, anarcho-socialist
Smoking a joint gets you harsher penalties than beating your fiancee unconcious and dragging her limp body by the hair.

http://www.thenation.com/blog/180775/burn-pink-jerseys-nfls-violence-against-women-problem

Two games. Baltimore Ravens running back Ray Rice was caught on a security camera dragging his unconscious wife-to-be Janay Palmer by the hair, after knocking her unconscious, and the National Football League has chosen to suspend him for two games. Rice in fact will return to the field just in time to wear the NFL’s pink-festooned uniforms to celebrate their deep commitment to breast cancer awareness—and their even deeper commitment to selling sixty-dollar jerseys marketed aggressively to their female fan base. In fact, the Ray Rice all-pink number is available for purchase right now. The NFL actually needs a Violence Against Women Month instead, to raise awareness about a killer that malignantly throbs in every locker room. But that is not going to happen, and it is worth understanding why.

The NFL, as many have been writing for too many years, has a violence-against-women problem. The incidents are too many to catalogue. But by suspending Ray Rice for two games, a lighter suspension than the league’s marijuana smokers receive, Roger Goodell and his coterie of owners are sending a message that it just doesn’t matter. I don’t know why anyone would expect more from a league notorious for racist nicknames, out-of-control owners and a locker-room culture that would shame some high schools. But still. Two games. I did not think the NFL had the capacity to stun me with its blockheadedness, but I was wrong.
 
Well, smoking a joint might drop your performance slightly and that could impact revenue. Beating your wife does not impact revenue, so: pity penalty. [/nfl]
 
Typical liberal spin. Ray Rice was trying to help beat the cancer out of his fiancee. If that isn't admirable, I don't know what is.
 
If Janay doesn't find his behavior bad enough to not marry him I do not see why NFL should be faulted for not taking too grim a view. It's not like a history of criminal activity is exceptional in the NFL, hence "National Felons League". If they got rid of them all, who would they have left?
 
He has also managed to avoid jail time for aggravated assault.

But people, please stop for a second and think about how hard this is on the Ravens.
 
If Janay doesn't find his behavior bad enough to not marry him I do not see why NFL should be faulted for not taking too grim a view. It's not like a history of criminal activity is exceptional in the NFL, hence "National Felons League". If they got rid of them all, who would they have left?
Well they should be faulted for tolerating all that criminal behaviour.

They obviously aren't too bothered by that fault, though.
 
If Janay doesn't find his behavior bad enough to not marry him I do not see why NFL should be faulted for not taking too grim a view. It's not like a history of criminal activity is exceptional in the NFL, hence "National Felons League". If they got rid of them all, who would they have left?

not talking about Janay.

Talking about the NFL and that organization's stance on its players engaging in domestic abuse.
 
Talking about the NFL and that organization's stance on its players engaging in domestic abuse.
Why should "domestic abuse" be lifted above all the other crimes NFL players engage in? Why is violence against women considered a bigger problem than violence against men (even though men are much more likely to be victims of violent crime)? Double standards again.
 
If Janay doesn't find his behavior bad enough to not marry him I do not see why NFL should be faulted for not taking too grim a view. It's not like a history of criminal activity is exceptional in the NFL, hence "National Felons League". If they got rid of them all, who would they have left?
Punters?
 
Talking about the NFL and that organization's stance on its players engaging in domestic abuse.
Why should "domestic abuse" be lifted above all the other crimes NFL players engage in? Why is violence against women considered a bigger problem than violence against men (even though men are much more likely to be victims of violent crime)? Double standards again.
So what crimes haven't the NFL treated harshly enough with?
 
Talking about the NFL and that organization's stance on its players engaging in domestic abuse.
Why should "domestic abuse" be lifted above all the other crimes NFL players engage in? Why is violence against women considered a bigger problem than violence against men (even though men are much more likely to be victims of violent crime)? Double standards again.
Why is "domestic abuse" limited to women in your definition? Are only women "domestically abused"? :confused:
 
Why should "domestic abuse" be lifted above all the other crimes NFL players engage in? Why is violence against women considered a bigger problem than violence against men (even though men are much more likely to be victims of violent crime)? Double standards again.
Why is "domestic abuse" limited to women in your definition? Are only women "domestically abused"? :confused:
Only males play in the NFL, and the NFL would likely not suspend a player for being the victim of domestic abuse.
 
Why should "domestic abuse" be lifted above all the other crimes NFL players engage in? Why is violence against women considered a bigger problem than violence against men (even though men are much more likely to be victims of violent crime)? Double standards again.
Why is "domestic abuse" limited to women in your definition? Are only women "domestically abused"? :confused:
Agreed. Domestic abuse is not categorically violence against women.

But the OP article calls for a Violence Against Women Month in response to this domestic abuse crime, not a Domestic Abuse Month. Which suggests that he is only aware of, or only concerned for, female victims of domestic abuse.
 
Why is "domestic abuse" limited to women in your definition? Are only women "domestically abused"? :confused:
For the purposes of this thread I was limiting myself to the NFL. And the vast majority of NFL players have female partners

As far as the general population there is domestic violence against men for sure, but it is being ignored by feminists. When cops are called for a "domestic" they usually arrest the man no matter who actually caused the violence. Hell, note how a woman (Marissa Alexander) who fired a shot toward her ex and his children and after being arrested went back and attacked him (requiring treatment) is being described as "domestic violence victim" by the media. :rolleyes:

Note also that the federal ant-domestic violence law is called "Violence against Women Act" in a disgusting codification of this sexist double standard.
 
So what crimes haven't the NFL treated harshly enough with?
Michael Vick was allowed back as soon as he was released from his (way too short) Club Fed sentence. His crimes were serious enough to warrant a lifetime ban from football above pee wee level.
 
Every league everywhere has to give its players harsher requirements and penalties. It would make both leagues and victims of crime safer. Problem is there's too much money in the system.
 
Talking about the NFL and that organization's stance on its players engaging in domestic abuse.
Why should "domestic abuse" be lifted above all the other crimes NFL players engage in? Why is violence against women considered a bigger problem than violence against men (even though men are much more likely to be victims of violent crime)? Double standards again.
Well, this wasn't comparing 'against women' criminals to 'against men' criminals getting a double standard.
It's comparing an 'against woman' crime to a rather victimless crime of smoking a joint. It's a clear case of 'no one gets hurt' punishment vs. 'someone gets hurt but no one important gets hurt.'
 
Back
Top Bottom