bilby
Fair dinkum thinkum
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 36,546
- Gender
- He/Him
- Basic Beliefs
- Strong Atheist
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/07/biden-unveils-ambitious-climate-plan-in-new-contrast-with-trump/
...
White House hopeful Joe Biden on Tuesday unveiled an ambitious climate change plan that would revamp the US energy sector and seek to achieve carbon pollution-free power in just 15 years.
...
“Transforming the American electrical sector to produce power without producing carbon pollution… will be the greatest spurring of job creation and economic competitiveness in the 21st century,” Biden said.
“That’s why we’re going to achieve a carbon pollution-free electric sector by the year 2035.”
...
Biden pledged to spend $2 trillion over four years to promote his plan, according to The Washington Post, a dramatic acceleration of the $1.7 trillion he had proposed to spend over 10 years in his climate plan during the primary race.
...
This is a pleasant surprise. A good reason to vote for Biden other than he is not Trump.
That article was a little short on details, don't you think? And no carbon pollution? Ridiculous. I'd be curious to see who came up with this plan. The fact that Biden has selected AOC as a co-chair on his climate change staff is pretty telling. Were there actually any scientists and engineers involved who have expertise in the subject matter?
It's not completely ridiculous. France reduced its carbon pollution from electricity generation to less than 50gCO2eg/kWh (less than 100 is considered 'ultra low') in less than fifteen years, from a starting point at around 950gCO2eg/kWh (950 is roughly what you get from using coal exclusively for electricity generation).
That was in the 1970s and '80s. The USA could easily replicate and even exceed that achievement today.
But not if they keep wasting money on intermittent "renewables".